Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The finish was very poor. It should have been highly polished, but what you could see was parts that were still blue. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

The finish was very poor. It should have been highly polished, but what you could see was parts that were still blue. 

How could the finish be improved? 

Posted (edited)

If you look at the finished screw you can still see blue on the inside of the shoulder and in the thread it is there and can be seen. If you take your time in making any part it should be properly finished. Look at the video at 24 37 and you will see what I mean 

Edited by oldhippy
Posted
1 hour ago, Klassiker said:

Very impressive skills on the lathe, and I want one of those taps!

Those rolling dies are great, but the initial diameter is crucial as they form rather than cut the thread. Made by Habegger, available from www.schurch-asco.com, surprisingly affordable.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
13 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

available from www.schurch-asco.com

Another good source for tools and equipment, and so far no indicate that they restrict sales to trade only. Thanks!

Posted

This was pure joy to watch.  Several questions though.

1) Is indirect heating better than direct?  Is that holder steel?  What is it called?

2) What is the purpose of bluing?  I thought it was to have a blue result, but evidently not.

3) What is the stuff he is using to blue?

4) I looked at the forming tool at the site given by @nickelsilver.  Seems the options are diameter but not thread pitch.  Thread pitch for watch screws still has my brain wrapped in a knot.  The screws I have made were cut using a screwplate and I have several different versions of the Martin Fills (L and B) that I use when I blindly try to fit the proper size.  So, what are the thread pitches for these.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

This was pure joy to watch.  Several questions though.

1) Is indirect heating better than direct?  Is that holder steel?  What is it called?

2) What is the purpose of bluing?  I thought it was to have a blue result, but evidently not.

3) What is the stuff he is using to blue?

4) I looked at the forming tool at the site given by @nickelsilver.  Seems the options are diameter but not thread pitch.  Thread pitch for watch screws still has my brain wrapped in a knot.  The screws I have made were cut using a screwplate and I have several different versions of the Martin Fills (L and B) that I use when I blindly try to fit the proper size.  So, what are the thread pitches for these.

When hardening it's good to protect the part from direct flame. This is often done by wrapping in iron wire and coating with pure soap, or sometimes borax, or sometimes a commercial anti-scale powder (a great one is available from gunsmith supplier Brownell's). I have a slightly different technique, using 20mm iron tubes on a handle, in which the part is placed the tube then filled with fine wood charcoal powder. Whatever the technique, even heating and avoidance of oxygen is the goal. The part, when at proper temperature, is then quenched.

 

For blueing his method is very good. I also put the part (which when done with the above anti-scale measures should be a clean grey, otherwise the black scale must be cleaned off to see the color change [and it should be clean of oil]) on brass fillings in a pan, over an alcohol flame. From the quench the steel is at its maximum hardness, and is very brittle. Heating to a lower temperature is called tempering, and blue is pretty much the standard color for watch components. The steel changes color at different temperatures, from a light straw to brown, then purple, dark blue, blue, light blue, then almost grey again. For a cutting tool you would temper to straw. Using the pan with filings helps ensure an even heating, and prolongs the process so that the temperature reaches into the part as well. For parts larger than watch-size you would need to do it in an oven for a specific amount of time for a given cross section.

 

The thread pitches on the Habegger rolling dies are the modern standard pitches according to NIHS. If you look at the Asco Schurch catalog, on the taps pages, they list the pitch for each diameter- as well as the tap drill size for both steel and brass which is great.

 

From memory, the Martin B (Bourgeaux) plates are quite close to the modern norm in pitch for a given diameter. Also from memory, the L or Latard plates are slightly finer pitch. As a bit of trivia- and this is from my observation, not a book, the Martin B holes correspond to the seemingly oddly-backward "tap size" for watch stems.

 

 

IMG_0010 (Large).JPG

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
×
×
  • Create New...