Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

So in Harrogate with my gorgeous wife, walked into an antique shop and ten minutes  later and 60 quid less walked out with this.  A silver cased  fully working Elgin pocket watch. Just needs a subdial hand 👍

20220501_113639.jpg

20220501_113613.jpg

Hi . Does anybody know who's makers stamp would be W.C. thanks

Posted
2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

So in Harrogate with my gorgeous wife, walked into an antique shop and ten minutes  later and 60 quid less walked out with this.  A silver cased  fully working Elgin pocket watch. Just needs a subdial hand 👍

20220501_113639.jpg

20220501_113613.jpg

Might not be an Elgin. I thought the mark on the back related to Elgin but it's used on many pocket watches. I won't know what's inside till I get home tomorrow 

16514165073109085858973306492611.jpg

2 hours ago, KarlvonKoln said:

Sweet!  Movement pics next, please?

Will do tomorrow when I get home.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Might not be an Elgin. I thought the mark on the back related to Elgin but it's used on many pocket watches.

dial doesn't look right for an Elgin?

then the marks on the back are what you typically find on a British case they referred to when it was made where was assayed and what it's made out of usually. Which is nice because then you can figure out exactly where it was at one particular point in time as opposed to other countries where it's kind of a mystery as to when it was made etc.

https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/britishhallmarkexamples.php

 

Posted
1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

dial doesn't look right for an Elgin?

then the marks on the back are what you typically find on a British case they referred to when it was made where was assayed and what it's made out of usually. Which is nice because then you can figure out exactly where it was at one particular point in time as opposed to other countries where it's kind of a mystery as to when it was made etc.

https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/britishhallmarkexamples.php

 

Hi John. No you are right it's not an Elgin. I came across some Elgins on ebay that had that Mark on the back. Like you say it's just a British case symbol. I've tracked the case down to London 1852. I have a silver smith makers stamp of W.C. but I'm down the toilet as to who that might be yet. 2 contenders are William Chawner and William Carter both London Silversmiths around that time. I can't quite make out the movement maker, it's  lovely script wrote so a little difficult to read.

20220501_174413.jpg

7 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Hi John. No you are right it's not an Elgin. I came across some Elgins on ebay that had that Mark on the back. Like you say it's just a British case symbol. I've tracked the case down to London 1852. I have a silver smith makers stamp of W.C. but I'm down the toilet as to who that might be yet. 2 contenders are William Chawner and William Carter both London Silversmiths around that time. I can't quite make out the movement maker, it's  lovely script wrote so a little difficult to read.

20220501_174413.jpg

 

20220501_181051.jpg

20220501_181019.jpg

20220501_180901.jpg

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I can't quite make out the movement maker, it's  lovely script wrote so a little difficult to read.

I tend to suck at reading script on watches but I know someone who's good at it if you get me a decent picture. then there are references I have a book that lists makers so I can look in soon as I get a name.

then it looks like a lever escapement I don't suppose we get a side view of the escapement?

Edited by JohnR725
Posted

Hi Definitley english is it a fusee with a chain?.    Harrogate  £80   not too bad, everything costs more  in Harrogte its posh there.    Have a shufty at the pocketwatchdatabase.com   and see what the number brings up.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Definitley english is it a fusee with a chain?.    Harrogate  £80   not too bad, everything costs more  in Harrogte its posh there.    Have a shufty at the pocketwatchdatabase.com   and see what the number brings up.

Yes it fusee ww. It was up at 68.00 and had a trade price of 60. I thought it was ok for 60.00. Needs a good service though. , I'm only getting 4 winds on the key about 3 hours.

14 minutes ago, Randy55 said:

This looks very much like your movement,..the regulator hand shape, balance cock filigree, overall positioning of jewel holes, etc.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/265661606110?hash=item3ddaaa68de:g:GhsAAOSw21ViZpee

Yes randy. Its very  similar 

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi  I have been looking for bits for a John Wycherly for over 2 years  nearly there, priblem with a lot of the english lever jobs was they were out sourced ie  some one made the plates another the dial another the wheels and so on and as a result a lot of them are One offs and parts dont interchange easily. In my case I got another movement A JW but the pilar heights were different although the front plate measured the same, the hunt goes on

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I tend to suck at reading script on watches but I know someone who's good at it if you get me a decent picture. then there are references I have a book that lists makers so I can look in soon as I get a name.

then it looks like a lever escapement I don't suppose we get a side view of the escapement?

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I tend to suck at reading script on watches but I know someone who's good at it if you get me a decent picture. then there are references I have a book that lists makers so I can look in soon as I get a name.

then it looks like a lever escapement I don't suppose we get a side view of the escapement?

I will get an inside photo tomorrow when I go home. 

2 hours ago, Randy55 said:

I'm seeing "Slow" and " Fast" in script...and a serial number.

But no maker that I can see in your photos ?

Haha yup I'm hoping there is something  inside 

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Definitley english is it a fusee with a chain?.    Harrogate  £80   not too bad, everything costs more  in Harrogte its posh there.    Have a shufty at the pocketwatchdatabase.com   and see what the number brings up.

I'm wondering how servicing a fusee will be for me. Thanks ww. I will have a look at that.

2 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Definitley english is it a fusee with a chain?.    Harrogate  £80   not too bad, everything costs more  in Harrogte its posh there.    Have a shufty at the pocketwatchdatabase.com   and see what the number brings up.

Serial no. 7429. Matches up on both the movement and the caseback.

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Definitley english is it a fusee with a chain?.    Harrogate  £80   not too bad, everything costs more  in Harrogte its posh there.    Have a shufty at the pocketwatchdatabase.com   and see what the number brings up.

Thanks ww. I think I have tracked  it down. The assay stamp of London and a date stamp of a lower case script letter  #a# gives me a date of 1876 for the case manufacture . The serial no of 7429 on both the case and the movement points  me towards the Columbus watch company that has serial numbers 1 -12000 between 1874 and 1879 . But I'm yet to find a description of the movement  design. Is there only a database for American pocket watches. I also have a question that someone may be able to answer regarding the silver stamps. It looks like the duty stamp has been erased and I've noticed this on other pocket watch cases. Could  this have been a standard practice for some reason, duty paid or more likely not paid ?

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted

Hi  The pocketwatchdatabase.com seems to have a lot of American watches, I dont think there is a compatible site that does the same for english watches.  English pocket watches vary a lot in style an make. all the books I have chart the development of the Pocketwatch but dont actualy have any identification data. As regards the duty stamp scrubbing it out doesnot make sense as it points to a fraud if t was legible no one would take much notice . Highlighting its removal does not add up.   There is a lot of data in Brittians old clocks and watches but its a hefty tome but again its about the history.

Posted
2 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  The pocketwatchdatabase.com seems to have a lot of American watches, I dont think there is a compatible site that does the same for english watches.  English pocket watches vary a lot in style an make. all the books I have chart the development of the Pocketwatch but dont actualy have any identification data. scrubbing it out doesnot make sense as it points to a fraud if t was legible no one would take much notice . Highlighting its removal does not add up.   There is a lot of data in Brittians old clocks and watches but its a hefty tome but again its about the history.

Under the movement looks similar to an Elgin in design. If I can find a picture of a Columbus watch  company within the area of the  serial no. I have I might be closer to an identification.  Some research  on the case maker wc may help as well. If they just made silverware or if they did actually sell watches Complete.  Or maybe a separate supplier  that Brought the case and watch together. Shame I have no name on the dial.

Posted

The usua w l method was that the watch maker would order cases from a maker such as Dennison who would make the cases to the specific sizes of watch, Of course being silver they had to be passed by the assay office hence the marking and date coding and the grade of silver used. In some cases the watches and the dials and cases ended up with the finisher who assembled them all together and fitted a named dial. He was not always the maker, people like bensons , smiths, ingersoll  and may others made the complete watch and assembled it.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Under the movement looks similar to an Elgin in design.

I'm trying to figure out what you mean by this? Were not quite on the same page of terminology so maybe you could explain it a little better to me?

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I'm trying to figure out what you mean by this? Were not quite on the same page of terminology so maybe you could explain it a little better to me?

Hi John sorry, I rushed the explanation. Taking the dust cover off. The design of the movement  looks similar to an Elgin. The one I have was made 1876, I've found a picture of an Elgin dated 1867 that looks quite  similar. 

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted
11 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

The design of the movement  looks similar to an Elgin. The one I have was made 1876, I've found a picture of an Elgin dated 1867 that looks quite  similar. 

I don't suppose we can have a picture?

Posted
2 hours ago, watchweasol said:

The usua w l method was that the watch maker would order cases from a maker such as Dennison who would make the cases to the specific sizes of watch, Of course being silver they had to be passed by the assay office hence the marking and date coding and the grade of silver used. In some cases the watches and the dials and cases ended up with the finisher who assembled them all together and fitted a named dial. He was not always the maker, people like bensons , smiths, ingersoll  and may others made the complete watch and assembled it.

Thanks ww. So I'm really  looking for three different parties.  The case maker, the movement makers and then the finisher. I know that ingersoll and smiths were connected for a short while and that Ingersoll were American. I'm going to go through some company  dates. The dial I suppose could have been swapped out for a no name, it does look in quite good condition.  I'm more interested in who made the movement really . It needs servicing, it's escape time slowed down to once every three seconds on my bedside cabinet and was quite loud, it was rather unnerving and spooky. I think I have some strange mediumist talent going on in my head haha.

7 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I don't suppose we can have a picture?

Hi John yes it's near the beginning of this thread .

10 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thanks ww. So I'm really  looking for three different parties.  The case maker, the movement makers and then the finisher. I know that ingersoll and smiths were connected for a short while and that Ingersoll were American. I'm going to go through some company  dates. The dial I suppose could have been swapped out for a no name, it does look in quite good condition.  I'm more interested in who made the movement really . It needs servicing, it's escape time slowed down to once every three seconds on my bedside cabinet and was quite loud, it was rather unnerving and spooky. I think I have some strange mediumist talent going on in my head haha.

Hi John yes it's near the beginning of this thread .

I'm not sure how to get the movement out of the case.

15 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thanks ww. So I'm really  looking for three different parties.  The case maker, the movement makers and then the finisher. I know that ingersoll and smiths were connected for a short while and that Ingersoll were American. I'm going to go through some company  dates. The dial I suppose could have been swapped out for a no name, it does look in quite good condition.  I'm more interested in who made the movement really . It needs servicing, it's escape time slowed down to once every three seconds on my bedside cabinet and was quite loud, it was rather unnerving and spooky. I think I have some strange mediumist talent going on in my head haha.

Hi John yes it's near the beginning of this thread .

I'm not sure how to get the movement out of the case.

Found it. A pair of specks really helps. Lol

32 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

don't suppose we can have a picture?

 

20220502_184211.jpg

20220502_184312.jpg

20220502_184350.jpg

20220502_184435.jpg

20220502_184509.jpg

49 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thanks ww. So I'm really  looking for three different parties.  The case maker, the movement makers and then the finisher. I know that ingersoll and smiths were connected for a short while and that Ingersoll were American. I'm going to go through some company  dates. The dial I suppose could have been swapped out for a no name, it does look in quite good condition.  I'm more interested in who made the movement really . It needs servicing, it's escape time slowed down to once every three seconds on my bedside cabinet and was quite loud, it was rather unnerving and spooky. I think I have some strange mediumist talent going on in my head haha.

Hi John yes it's near the beginning of this thread .

I'm not sure how to get the movement out of the case.

Found it. A pair of specks really helps. Lol

 

20220502_184211.jpg

20220502_184312.jpg

20220502_184350.jpg

20220502_184435.jpg

20220502_184509.jpg

Oh my word . Ive just been watching it run under my scope. I think I've just fallen in love with pocket watches.

9 hours ago, watchweasol said:

As regards the duty stamp scrubbing it out doesnot make sense

Hi John. I've worked out was going on. I'm home now so stripped the movement  out of the case. There was no duty stamp, it was the winding stem that has scored a mark in the case back. Behind the movement are the same marks . The passant lion , the town assay (london) and the year letter 1876 and then the makers stand W C. and the journeyman stamp  x. Were duty stamps a later addition? 

20220502_190201.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  has a close look at the mark near the number,  I thing its an old english script and could be a letter y but dont know what the font type is. I looks styalised and its been hand done.

If you are intested in the case making art  read the attachment

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrIQZGNNHBiHo8AyRt3Bwx.;_ylu=Y29sbwMEcG9zAzQEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1651549454/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.vintagewatchstraps.com%2fwatchcases.php/RK=2/RS=NQw4bR1MqzeiD1_5Enbo8BEcUEI-

All the writing is hand done. That must be the makers name, a lot of trouble to hand scribe and not put your name to it.

Posted (edited)

You have to be a little careful servicing a fusee watch. It is pretty easy to damage stuff.

They tend to all be a little bit different, but there is some general advice here.

 

I'm no expert, but if you run into problems or need advice, post here and someone will no doubt assist. Parts are difficult to get and you may end up having to adapt or make bits.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Thanks 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

You have to be a little careful servicing a fusee watch. It is pretty easy to damage stuff.

They tend to all be a little bit different, but there is some general advice here.

 

I'm no expert, but if you run into problems or need advice, post here and someone will no doubt assist. Parts are difficult to get and you may end up having to adapt or make bits.

Thanks Andy. I did think I might be out of my depth at the moment.  Appreciate the videos. It does need some work as it keeps stopping, the Inside is amazing to watch.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
    • What browser are you using Rich? Fine for me using Chrome 
×
×
  • Create New...