Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I haven't seen a balance complete that was intended to have the overcoil formed by the watchmaker, but it could exist. One thing to check- pretty much all Breguet springs have a collet with the hole for the spring significantly lower than a normal collet (normal would be hole right in the middle of the collet height). If your spring is in the middle, it was to be a flat spring.

I noticed that on the collet of a movado i have. At first i though the spring had been damaged. It runs amazingly well for what was a battered old watch.

14 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Here is what I purchased.  I have myself to blame, as clearly there is no overcoil in the pictures

2022-05-10 13_44_29-Cyma Cal 510 511 515 530 531 540 541 610 611 613 1713 1815 Balance Complete NOS .png

2022-05-10 13_44_10-Cyma Cal 510 511 515 530 531 540 541 610 611 613 1713 1815 Balance Complete NOS .png

2022-05-10 13_43_55-Cyma Cal 510 511 515 530 531 540 541 610 611 613 1713 1815 Balance Complete NOS .png

2022-05-10 13_43_43-Cyma Cal 510 511 515 530 531 540 541 610 611 613 1713 1815 Balance Complete NOS .png

I have my eye on a couple of donors as a backup.  One is in the UK and the seller will not ship to US, but another has already made the trip.  As earlier stated, I will attempt the over coil...but I need a backup plan.

I have been in contact with the seller.  This is my mistake due to my inexperience.  The seller offered to refund the sale, but I did not accept it since I clearly could see what I was buying.  Lesson learned.

The 571 can come with and w/o the over coil as seen in this document image.

New question.  Is the only difference between the planar and over coil implementations the regulator pin length?

s-l1600 (1).jpg

Although the package shows a breguet.  Whatever

 

Changed at some point in its life ? NOS or not. Robbed of it original hs replaced with a flat spring ?

23 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I just don’t know. What you say is plausible, however.

regardless, I am going to have to learn to bens a Breguet.

I watched a good video of how to bend a brequet while i was trying to work out what i had. I'll  see if i can find it and post a link. The music did my head in a bit though. Fortunately you can turn it down as there was no commentary. 

23 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I just don’t know. What you say is plausible, however.

regardless, I am going to have to learn to bens a Breguet.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ID2Ndl6igwM&t=101s

35 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I noticed that on the collet of a movado i have. At first i though the spring had been damaged. It runs amazingly well for what was a battered old watch.

Changed at some point in its life ? NOS or not. Robbed of it original hs replaced with a flat spring ?

I watched a good video of how to bend a brequet while i was trying to work out what i had. I'll  see if i can find it and post a link. The music did my head in a bit though. Fortunately you can turn it down as there was no commentary. 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ID2Ndl6igwM&t=101s

The forming tweezers are ridiculously expensive. An old pair of standard are going to require some shaping and dressing.

Posted

Hats off to you for attempting to form the overcoil yourself. You've nothing to lose If your conscience compels you to not return the incorrect part. Trying to find the correct part at the same time is obviously a good strategy. Apart from donors, I would keep up the search for the NOS part. Watchguy UK for example has a useful list of available parts and links to potential sellers. Good luck!

  • 3 months later...
Posted

This is iteration number six or seven...it is hard to keep count.  Methodology for this turn was aided by a number of phone calls with a forum member...coaching me...

I made a carbide file to do the finish work on the roller side.  It polishes extremely well.

Full disclosure...I started with a large pocket watch staff because I have had some issues with my other starting material.  However, I made every cut except for the hub.

I am posting this now while I am happy 😄😄 before disaster strikes.  Today, I will install the balance, check the fitting in the watch...then install the rest.

No matter what happens, I can say for sure that my skills (minimal as they are) are improving.

2022-08-20 09_21_33-IMG_8857.JPG ‎- Photos.png

I think the pivot on the left is a little short, but hoping it will work fine.

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Update. The roller and hairspring fit fine except when I installed the balance, the roller jewel rides over the pallet horns, so the roller is sitting too high. I am going to have to nudge it down a bit.

I use Rex Roller Remover whenever messing with rollers, so I think I will set it up and just tap the balance down a hair.

My respect for you guys who do this stuff daily has gone up an order of magnitude!

  • Like 1
Posted

Well it looks like an excellent go there! As you've noticed, most sources on staff dimensions give a lot but not all the info. If you had had the length from bottom pivot to hub you would have been fine- and the hub length dimension can vary quite a lot.

 

If anything, I think the pivot on the left (top pivot) looks just right, the lower one is a bit long. Great work though.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
On 8/21/2022 at 10:46 AM, nickelsilver said:

If anything, I think the pivot on the left (top pivot) looks just right, the lower one is a bit long.

Confirmed.  It was too long.  I cut it back 10 to 20 microns for a good fit.

Here is a complete update.

I assembled the balance with the roller only.  Removed the pallet fork from the watch.  Then assembled the balance in the movement with balance cock in place and tightened.  Using a puffer, I could make the balance spin very fast and seemed to have a nice gradual spin down.  All looked well.

I reinstalled the pallet fork, and then I added the hairspring and assembled the full balance.  Installed in the watch, it ran...but with low amplitude.  I checked the HS to see that it was not rubbing.  I adjusted the beat (as observed on my oscilloscope).  The balance was not rubbing either.  Just low amplitude.

A little exasperated, so I decided to try something that I had avoided.  Some time back, I had purchased a NOS balance complete but it was not the breguet version, so it has set to the side.  I had never attempted to try this with the breguet HS because the collet had a larger diameter than the staff.  While chatting with my phone buddy, he told me to collapse the collet using a concave punch (taking not of doing this on the end of the collet.  So, I did this with success.  This is a great idea BTW and is now in my bag of tricks.

With the NOS balance and original HS, the watch performed the same.  This, oddly, was comforting because it seemed to imply that my staff was not the problem.

I have observed this thing under high power microscope and I cannot find any HS rubbing on the balance.  The HS appears planar in in a plane parallel to the balance wheel plane.  I do not see the balance rubbing against anything either.

I don't have a good feel for end shake and side shake, but I did tested it.  Seems a little much but I don't know.  The behavior of the watch is pretty much the same regardless of position.

One other thing I did...I landed a Cyma 573 on ebay (mine is a 571) and I took the MS barrel (with MS) and put it in the 571 in case the MS was just week.  This did not seem to make a difference.  I also disassembled the train wheels and looked for issues...nothing found.

Here is a slo mo just for grins.  Not enough magnification to tell anything...but this forum loves pictures.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Posted
3 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Are you sure the hairprings match balances?  

Escapement might need adujutment.

Lol...this journey started in April. I checked my ebay purchases today to address this very question. I think it is the HS for this watch. I love this path I am on in spite of the pain!

  • 1 month later...
Posted

This watch continues to prove that I am a rank amateur.

It has been acting up, so I dove back in to figure this out.  Lots of details I will not go into, suffice it to say, (as noted above) I made a new staff, and retrofit a hairspring and roller table.

It was going crazy slow and I started investigating the pallet fork horns perhaps hitting the roller table which led me to the pallet fork itself and the pallet fork plate. 

I noticed a lot of side shake on the pivot, so I measured the hole and compared it with a donor watch and found about 40um difference I think (measured it but didnt write it down).

I show the two plates here.  Wondering if I should close it a bit by staking.

This picture really does not illustrate the difference but everybody loves pictures.

Notice the different color of the plates.  I think someone filed down the one on the left exposing bare brass.

2102270472_2022-10-1819_31_02-20221018_192908.jpg-Photos.png.590931f6ae9dee370db93e413fb12deb.png

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...