Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is partially a follow up to Davey57's post with a similar title, but I didn't want to hijack that thread with a different clock. I've been trying to identify the maker of an old clock that I inherited, and it too has some figures scratched into the back of the case. I'd been reading these as 14/34, but after seeing Davey's post, I'm wondering if it could possibly be 14 1 34, as in 14 Jan 1934. Crudely scratching numbers onto the case with a screwdriver seems like an odd way to date it at the factory, but I suppose it's possible.  The letters underneath could be OXP. There's no maker's name anywhere on the clock, only 'Made in England' on the brass plate at the back. The mechanism looks a lot like pictures I've seen of Smith Enfield clocks, but despite looking at a lot of clocks online I've never come across a Smith Enfield without some kind of branding.  The glass at the front opens what feels like the 'wrong way' to me, with the hinges at the 3 side, but maybe that's not unusual.  I'd be interested if anyone has any thoughts on whether or not it could be a Smith Enfield and if 1934 is a feasible date.  P.S It's goes and strikes fine. P.P.S. I'm aware it's not a valuable antique, I'm just curious.   

 

 

IMG_20220313_133410598.thumb.jpg.e720f59d0365801c514cef771c83600b.jpg     

IMG_20220313_133113591.jpg

IMG_20220313_133323293.jpg

Posted

The movement looks like a Enfield F1 and the Made in England on the movement makes the date around 1932-c.1944 other's  with more information will correct me if i am wrong .

  • Like 1
Posted

The style is in the form of Art Deco because of the shape of the bezel and the shape of the hands. Certainly it dates around the 1930's. Is there nothing on the bottom of the dial? It sure looks like a Smiths.  Looks like a mistake made in the manufacture of the back plate (red circle) at first I thought it was a bushing but seeing the oil sinks on the strike side it is some mistake. The stamping of Made in England is very crude when magnified. Sorry I can't be more positive about your clock.   

IMG_20220313_133323293.jpg.0a2fab57280067c8ae1b2975aa88ffae.jpg

Posted

Hear is a photo out of clock making in England and Wales in the Twentieth Century showing a F1 movement that looks a lot like yours hope that helps

Posted
40 minutes ago, Willow said:

Hear is a photo out of clock making in England and Wales in the Twentieth Century showing a F1 movement that looks a lot like yours hope that helps

I see no clock. 😀

Posted
15 hours ago, RogerH said:

it does look spot on - it even has the same mark OH highlighted. What's the story with it?

Hi all i know from the book is Enfield purchased the German production line for the BADUF striking clock and installed it at Edmonton. The clocks produced were sold as the Enfield 14-day striking clock and were the F1 one model. As you can see in the photo they are near enough identical. This time oldhippy i did post the photo😀

IMG_20220315_074737215.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you all very much for the replies. All very helpful and interesting. That Enfield F1 movement does indeed look exactly like mine, and despite possibly having no lubrication in the last 50 years, it still runs for almost 14 days between winds. I've double and triple checked, and there really is no makers name anywhere on the clock. Based on the posts above, and that the clock, to my inexpert eye, looks quite roughly put together, I'm wondering if it could be some bottom of the range Smiths Enfield model that they didn't want to put their name to.  Equipped with the new information you've supplied, I'll continue my research and report back if I come up with anything interesting. Thanks again for the help. 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

A quick update. I found a clock identical to mine on an old ebay listing where it is described as a 1930s Enfield art deco 14-day striking mantel clock.  I also got hold of the May 1980 edition of Clocks magazine which has an article on the Enfield Clock Company. That article states that 1935/36 saw the introduction of a 14 day clock fully complete to sell for the highly competitive price of 10 shillings. 25 000 of these 10s clocks were purchased by the firm of Dupont brothers who sold door to door on credit. I suspect that this door-to-door route is how the clock entered my family.  So, my curiosity is now satisfied. Thanks for all the help supplied in this thread, which turned out to be spot on. 

I attach a picture of the ebay clock, in somewhat better condition than my own.       

enfield.jpg

Posted

I used to buy Clocks magazine had the very first addition and bought it for years after. I even had articles I had written published in some very early copies.  

Posted

No sorry. I sold all mine many years ago. When I retired I only kept a few tools and got rid of all the other. I wish I had kept everything but I would need a large workshop to keep it all in. Because I have been on this site for a few years I have got interested in horology again and I have bought two lathes Unimat 3 with loads of accessories a mainspring winder identical to what I had a few clocks and some books.    

Posted

Glad to hear you are picking up the tools again, Your neck problems, are they still a problem in indulging in the cloccs. At least at hobby level you can take a break when you want.    always interested in your in put        all the best.

Posted

I have just started my subscription the magazine is very good,  what sort of clocks are you working on oldhippy would be nice to see.

Posted

I have nice French clock a strike on bell that keeps stopping so I need to look at that. A French timepiece just one of those black slate jobs. A Georgian fusee chime on bells which needs a lot of work, don't know when I'll get round to that. I don't do much in the restoration side only when the mood take me. I'm to wrapped up in looking after my two cats Freddie & Buster both about 18 months old and genealogy which take up most of my time I have been working on that for must be about 17 years. 

Posted
On 4/16/2022 at 8:16 AM, oldhippy said:

I used to buy Clocks magazine had the very first addition and bought it for years after. I even had articles I had written published in some very early copies.  

OH I have cancelled my Clock Magazine this year because it is just poorly put together with very little help to an amateur such as myself. 

Posted

I have just looked at their web site and it see its £7.95 a copy. Would you believe it they charge £8 95 for old back issues from 1979.  I used to have it on subscription it was always first class I learned a lot from it. 

clockboy your no amateur. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
×
×
  • Create New...