Jump to content

Is cracking a cannon pinion an achievement?


Recommended Posts

Yeah...I am probably the first one to do this.  Not my first cannon pinion adjustment either, but it was a disaster.  I have the tools to get it right but failed.  Happily, I had a backup from a donor.  Cannon pinions are a pain in the @ss.  I found one on ebay so I have another backup.  Watchmaking is about learning from your mistakes!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When workng on vintage watches look out for the 'hollow center wheel pinion' type of cannon pinion where the fit is obtained by interference between the center pin and the cannon pinion. These cannon  pinions are hard steel and break up if an attempt is made to squeeze them. The correct adjustment is to flatten the centre pin. If you are fortunate enough to have a copy of Fried it is all explained in Book III Chapter V.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LittleWatchShop said:

YOU MADE IT??  There are not enough years left in my life to get to that level of skill...shoulda started earlier.

It helps when you make gearing regularly and have a massive stock of cutters and a profile projector and all the other gear ready to go! I was in boogie mode, maybe 2 hours start to finish.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

It helps when you make gearing regularly and have a massive stock of cutters and a profile projector and all the other gear ready to go! I was in boogie mode, maybe 2 hours start to finish.

I would love to see a pictorial tour of your shop setup... I'm pretty sure you're the most legit, actual watchmaker on this whole site. I want to know what gulf lies between my roll top desk hastily shoved into a corner of the dining room and your atelier.

Edited by spectre6000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jack75 said:

Shouldn't you attribute to Mark Lovick the same compliment?   I would.

Of course...but there is a difference. @nickelsilver appears to fabricate lots of parts.  This is of particular interest to me.  Somebody on this forum chided me about a year ago...just when I was getting on board.  Something like: "You want to be a watchmaker or a part swapper?"  That was inspiring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least 4! You need someone else to do the filming (and the editing!). Once you are in the flow, you don't want to be thinking about photography. Concentrate on what you do best. What Mark Lovick produces is so impressive because the standard of watchmaking and filming are both so high.

Edited by Klassiker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Of course...but there is a difference. @nickelsilver appears to fabricate lots of parts.  This is of particular interest to me.  Somebody on this forum chided me about a year ago...just when I was getting on board.  Something like: "You want to be a watchmaker or a part swapper?"  That was inspiring.

No offence and no disparagement to nickelsilver, who probably uses the fine old watchmaker's tools? But since low-cost CNC machines have become so universal we can all make these parts. I can with my $450 machine and with a fourth axis I could even make my own screws. Christain Danneman (WatchGuy) has shown the way. And he even supplies the gcode for some parts. You also could do it with the gcode experience from 3d printing.    https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/cnc

But there is some purity and satisfaction in the use of the "old fashioned" tools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good start is to read https://watchguy.co.uk/a-new-era/ and https://watchguy.co.uk/cnc-update/

Then search online for one of the hundreds of machines: 3 or 4 axes, kit or assembled, working material. I started with a 3-axes Chinese kit (eBay) intended for work on plastics, aluminium and brass. Then swapped the motor for a pre-owned 15,000 rpm 36V servo motor (also eBay - rip out the control gear and just use as drive for the milling tool). Then some home-made setting up accessories. Total expenditure was $450. For that I have 0.1mm precision and can cut small parts in steel, brass or CuBe. Another cost is the fairly large number of Kyocera end mills. Grblcontrol and Carbide Create software for an easy life, plus gcode from Christian.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...