Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I got ahold of a vintage 1967 Timex Marlin, one of the ones with a jeweled movement, and I have a couple question about it.  I understand we have a resident Timex expert in @JerseyMo, but anyone with insights can chime in.

Firstly, is the "dunk and swish" method of clean regarded as an acceptable way to clean these watches?  The one I have does have screws, but being full-plate, and with what appear to be various spring held in place only by their own tension, I'm concerned about reassembly.  Are there any guides or tutorial out there that cover a full disassembly?

Second, what kind of amplitude should I expect out of a reasonably serviced movement?  

Lastly, any information or tips on cleaning/oiling these jewels that appear to be capped?  It looks like there's a retaining spring, but I'm not sure how to remove it or what to expect if I do:

marlin_jewel.thumb.jpg.e1dd7c462f1dda46c27dde2f100a8742.jpg

Edited by kibbler
wrong year, and clarifying question about the jewel
Posted

FYI if that is the movement inside your watch than it is not a marlin.....rather it is a 21 Jewels automatic.

You can try the 'dunk and swish' as you so call it since it requires little effort.  But know that those cap jewels need to be oiled too.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JerseyMo said:

FYI if that is the movement inside your watch than it is not a marlin.....rather it is a 21 Jewels automatic.

You can try the 'dunk and swish' as you so call it since it requires little effort.  But know that those cap jewels need to be oiled too.

Thanks,  I'm still learning.  I was able to remove the cap jewels with a properly sized screwdriver, based on the instructions in the service manual.

I gave it a preliminary oiling after an initial immersion in naptha, and it's running at ~180* amplitude.  Is that terrible?  It seems low, but I know the Timex movements don't follow all the same principles of Swiss movements.  

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, JerseyMo said:

FYI if that is the movement inside your watch than it is not a marlin.....rather it is a 21 Jewels automatic.

You can try the 'dunk and swish' as you so call it since it requires little effort.  But know that those cap jewels need to be oiled too.

Do you tear these movements down further than the service manuals recommend, or stop with removing the balance wheel?

*edit* I see that the 1961 service manual includes instructions for removing the pallet fork and escape wheel, while the Model 72 service manual does not.  Is that only for replacing/repairing those parts, or for cleaning as well?

Edited by kibbler
Posted

As a beginner, I would advise you not to do a full disassembly. It is very difficult to get the plates together again.

Probably when you become more experienced, then a full teardown and clean would be better, as naptha is not the best cleaning agent for dried up lubricants. 

I've only done one of these 21 jewel movements several years ago and it's NOT fun. You have to modify a screwdriver tip to fit the slot in the cap jewel cover to remove them. And they have a tendency to escape and disappear. Getting a replacement jewel would be next to impossible. 

At the end of the day, it still looks terrible on a timegrapher, but keeps good time and looks good on the wrist.

Sooo.... Good luck and keep us posted

Posted (edited)

Well, I took the balance out today, along with removing all the cap jewels to get everything clean and oiled a little better.

I have to say upon trying to reinstall and re-pin the balance, I thought I had made a huge mistake; that thing is fiddly as hell and it took me ages to get the pallet and the spring in the right position again.  I finally got the pin back in there, only to see on my timing software that I had ~12ms of beat error, and it was running +180 s/d with the regulator maxed out.  I had inserted the spring too far into the pin slot thing.

The second time around, things went a bit more smoothly. The last coil of the hairspring still isn't perfect, but at least the amplitude went up, the beat error went down, and I managed to get reasonable  (for me) accuracy

timex_21.PNG.48b44223a0eecdc6fdf548d9aa64606c.PNG

Edited by kibbler
wording
Posted

agreed with above replies.  I go with the path of lease resistance …

three stage cleaning method. ammonia, water rinse, lighter fluid,....air dry in between.  aid by ultra sonic.

full tear down only when I need to get out some frustration and get to curse and throw tools 🙂

timing machine!  I do not have one and don't want one.  I get them running, wear them and adjust best I can.  Even I know these are only Timex and not the other famous "X"

 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, JerseyMo said:

timing machine!  I do not have one and don't want one.

 

Yes, I was using it more as a diagnostic tool (is it running ok?) rather than to get precise timing.

Do you know what size gaskets these watches use for the caseback?  I ordered some 30.0mm x 0.6mm based on the one that came out of it, but seems a bit loose and/or thin

Posted
14 hours ago, kibbler said:

Yes, I was using it more as a diagnostic tool (is it running ok?) rather than to get precise timing.

Do you know what size gaskets these watches use for the caseback?  I ordered some 30.0mm x 0.6mm based on the one that came out of it, but seems a bit loose and/or thin

never measured one actually.  I have a huge stash of parts I go to when needed.

 

Posted (edited)
On 3/14/2022 at 6:51 PM, HectorLooi said:

At the end of the day, it still looks terrible on a timegrapher, but keeps good time and looks good on the wrist.

Sooo.... Good luck and keep us posted

I got everything back together, polished the crystal a bit, and added a band.  The winding rotor has a bit more side-to-side play than I would prefer, but it seems to work well, and makes a very satisfying sound.  I have to agree with you that it looks good on the wrist.  Here are a few photos that I took during disassembly and after cleaning/reassembling

PXL_20220314_200449677.thumb.jpg.fef8ac219e1b1bf3983b019382074275.jpgPXL_20220314_200659021.thumb.jpg.c0fc8ca70675a65663590ff11e5e7943.jpgPXL_20220314_201057356.thumb.jpg.9ddbb3ca6e162b28afbdfbda67a46834.jpg

Reassembled:

PXL_20220315_234225998.thumb.jpg.2f486be66eaa552c08656152e8265d6b.jpgPXL_20220316_005859892.thumb.jpg.7f54af767a9a066a06eee9f40c85bc82.jpgPXL_20220316_005823388.thumb.jpg.344634e18c85a241b3bd376781652fdd.jpgPXL_20220316_022127612.thumb.jpg.17bf116a85efe16602a16eb537816543.jpg

 

 

Edited by kibbler
  • Like 1
Posted

That looks as good, the fact its powered by Timex is irrelevent in my book. The acid test is its time keeping if its accurate it matters not a jot what the timegrapher says.  well done another classic saved.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...