Jump to content

1929 Harwood


Geo

Recommended Posts

This watch arrived today from Switzerland and I’m absolutely delighted with it. It is better than expected, the dial is original and there are hardly any marks on the case, pretty good for an eighty six year old! Even the bezel rotates easily, maybe too easily.

post-124-0-48131500-1430942400_thumb.jpg

post-124-0-84136600-1430942419_thumb.jpg

There had been no attempt made clean it up prior to the sale as the silver had a fair bit of tarnish on it. There are no badly damaged screws, and the damascening on the movement is unmarked. The advert said that was “used and in running condition” and “Needs service before wear”. The first thing I did was give it a few shakes and put it on the timegrapher, well it looked like a target that had been shot with a sawn off shotgun.

post-124-0-64839900-1430942481_thumb.jpg

Next thing was to demagnitise it and low and behold things got a lot better.

post-124-0-89190600-1430943221_thumb.jpg

I then gave the crystal a rub with 1200 wet& dry and polished it with Autosol, the case was also given a light polish, but only with a silver cloth.

post-124-0-49020600-1430942538_thumb.jpg

Having had it on my wrist for a few hours, I then put it back on the timegrapher and it was keeping better time, albeit with a wonky graph. It will be put away for a while until I clear my feet of other projects, then it will get a full service.

post-124-0-76917600-1430942581_thumb.jpg

My sincere thanks go to Colin (CDJSwiss)for introducing me to these wonderful historical pieces.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations, Geo, it's a beauty with the pearling, relatively rare, and the decorated dial window,  very rare - copied on all of the replica Harwoods. What are the silver marks - Swiss or UK?

 

Swiss Patent 106583:
selfwinding mechanism
filed 10-16-1923, John Harwood, Baldrine-Lonon (Ile of Man, GB) und Harry Cutts, Brighton (GB)

 

Interesting result of de-magnetisation. I must try it - never done it on a complete watch, only on a balance bridge and hairspring carefully wrapped in tissue paper.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good morning Colin.

The hallmarks are British, London import mark, Sterling silver mark and date letter for 1929 at the top. At the bottom is the makers mark for George Stockwell and the serial number. Below the serial number is a letter S and I have no idea what that is for.

post-124-0-55747900-1430978412_thumb.jpg

I should have said in my first post that I had to demagnetise the watch twice before it would run accurately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, George, for this photo (good advertising for Chrono24 also!).

 

I have just put a complete watch onto my de-magnetiser (not an expensive one) and was alarmed at the 50 Hz noise that was produced, presumable by the hairspring vibrating? Could it be that apart from removing any residual magnetism this also cleans the hairspring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see it cleaning it, unless there was a lot of steel swarf sticking to it! I feel it is a lot safer to demag the complete watch as everything is held together securely. Also everything in the watch that is steel will be demagnetised.

I would just like to mention for others that may be interested, the results that on the Harwood were achieved with demagnetising alone, I did not adjust the regulator at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been looking into the marks. This watch was presumably produced in collaboration with Fortis for international markets at Walter Vogt's factory in Grenchen. The case would have been made in CH as it has the London import mark and GS as importer. The S under the serial number was probably the sign of case maker Stila of La Chaux-de-Fonds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Continuing the Harwood silver marks saga, Here is a photo of my silver Harwood watch back.

 

post-374-0-66828400-1430990621_thumb.jpg

 

Imported by a Glasgow sponsor in 1929. That's the easy bit. But the mark A5M is a mystery. There has been some discussion on watchuseek between David Boettcher and another person who has also seen this mark, but without clarification. There is no known Glasgow silversmith or sponsor using the mark AM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
×
×
  • Create New...