Jump to content

Hand Winding Mainsprings...


Recommended Posts

I am saving money for mainspring winders, but I'm having trouble winding with finger cots. I wind them with cots and they always end up with bits of rubber stuck in them.

Should I forget the cots, wash my hands, and use them with bare fingers?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a watch maker sneaking through my bench and he said, "Man, I'm so sorry!" I said, "I know my tools are used and limited!" He said, "No, those condoms are really small!" I don't think he uses them at all, but I didn't ask because he caught me off guard. Lol

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about this, you can clean your hands all you want, they're still going to sweat and excrete oil just as much. Finger cots are great but I can see your point about hand winding with them, can be problematic. Not sure what to suggest.

(and yes, with finger cots, many a time with colleagues and customers I've had to smile and say 'it's not what it looks like', I try to make light of it, because I just wouldn't want to work without them)

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only have a small set of right handed winders ,so often hand wind. I give my hands a thorough clean and scrub with a nail brush then once dried off roll rodico around the tips. Once the spring is in I roll rodico over the open barrel end and clean the closed barrel with rodico with cots on. As I suffer from springlexia I always photograph the spring in the barrel before I remove it as I have been known to refit them upside down. :thumbsd:  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My friend uses spray on plaster dressing (it forms a thin skin over the area applied) for cracked skin.  I am going to do trials on how well this stays in place and how soluble it is in oil, water etc.  I have tried it on a wound in the past it it was quite difficult to remove so maybe worth a punt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Canthus,

Dry your hands off ...meaning no moisture. Wind your spring in. Rinse in zippo fluid. Oil as you would normally but use your oiler to spread the oil over all the visible edges of the spring.

If you're replacing with a new spring, its even less as a problem as they are are made of an alloy which resists rust well. If you are reusing a blue steel mainspring then moisture is not really your problem as these springs lose their 'springiness' over time and will need to be replaced.

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if I washed my hands and then proceeded to wind and lube the mainspring by hand, but instead, once the barrel is closed I use a q-tip with one dip on it and give the outside barrel a gentle bath with the q-tip and dip?

I have to take a picture too!

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by diamondslayer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of the barrel is the least of your problems... You can use a qtip/dip but even a wipe with a clean dry cloth will work if you use rodico to get the fibers out of the barrel teeth.

The main thing is to avoid moisture and other contaminants inside the barrel itself.

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
×
×
  • Create New...