Jump to content

Looking for an alternative ETA7750 oscillating-weight bolt tool.


Recommended Posts

Dear All;

I've to change out a bearing of an ETA7750 oscillating weight. The bearing is hold in place by what is called an "oscillating weight bolt" (1491), it's a kind of a flat washer.

1571687856_ScreenShot2021-10-02at12_48_17.png.9f6bcd2d821fb373c5e3e734381f4052.png

To aid fixing the "bolt" to the bearing there is a special tool (6823) on the market;

1889759163_ScreenShot2021-10-02at12_51_38.png.2644eecea2716b33dac35596aca10bf6.png

So far, the tools I've seen are rather expensive for a job I've to perform seldom to near never again.

Disconnection the bolt from the old bearing was easy enough but pressing / turning the bolt back on may be a bit more of a challenge.

Has anybody some tricks on their sleeve (method or DIY-tool) to connect this "bolt" without the need of this expensive special tool ?

Hope to hear ....... 😉

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not the "right" answer, but it looks like you could treat it like a... I can't think of the name of the thing... A blind nut with slots in the side... Secure the movement/rotor, then take a pair of screw drivers, or peg wood if it's not too tight and you don't want to risk scratches, in opposing slots and push. If it were large scale on an engine or some other industrial machine, you'd drop a drift or something in the slot, and hammer it loose.

Edited by spectre6000
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your contribution 😉

That's how I removed the "bolt" (I still find it a strange name for something which looks like spring-washer), two peg-woods in either side slots and rotated. Which direction you rotate is irrelevant. The "bolt" is like a square which, once rotated, locks in four places.

With the weight and bearing in place, resting on a stacking-block, I tried to do the reverse, but next to rotation one has to press the "bolt" all along the circumference down to slip into the (4x) slot. It's the rotation combined with the circumference pressure down which makes it hard(er) to lock. Obviously the tool makes it and easy job; push down and rotate.

Now thinking out loud; perhaps a (modified?) cheap hollow hole-punch may do the trick.... (?) Perhaps, without modification the friction may be just enough to turn the bolt? Will tomorrow look into that idea ..... 🙂

Any other suggestion are also welcome .......

 

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Followed up on my last night suggested idea and as @watchweasol subsequently doubled; a 5.5mm hollow hole-punch fits very neatly over the "neck" of the bearing and once in place & pressed down, leaving plenty of room to insert a pointed peg-wood into one of the "bolt"-slots to assist rotation. Press down and rotate with the peg-wood; works as a treat and, since I had the punches, with no additional tool cost 😉

No modification to the punch needed.

Problem solved and one more trick in the bag 🙂

Thanks all 👍

 

 

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Plato said:

Does anyone offer a watchmaking tool rental service? Could be a good business idea.

Not sure if that will work/is cost efficient with "modern" high registered shipping cost. It most likely also requires an amount to be deposited in case the tool get damaged or simply doesn't get returned.....

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those one off tools are a curse! They always seem to fall under two categories: Use it once and never use it again, or use it once, need it later and forget you already have it, and order it a second time, use it, then discover you already had one when you go to put it away to never be used again.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now I'm making do with a similar micrometer (the one below is $45 shipped but you can find better deals) and a $20 stand. You do have to be excruciatingly careful measuring jewels, since there's no table, but if you don't have the $500 to throw around, it's a nice option.
    • As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!
    • Next one up an AS 554, looks like a bit more to this one. First job is to check thickness, most springs are somewhere between .3 and .4, this one measures .35, that matches in with the .4 spring steel i ordered. So for marking up a permanent marker comes in handy to colour up the steel to be marked later with a scriber once its dry. Bestfit provide the extra bit of info for the jumper spring that is missing.
    • Thanks again, Marc.  Super helpful. I was wondering what the hole was for, and now it makes perfect sense. With your help and the other members here, it looks like I'm good to go with my Seitz tool set. I had to order some replacement pushers, but with those, the set is complete and in good condition. Now, I need to figure out what tool to buy to measure jewels (amongst other watch-related parts). I had my eye on the JKA Feintaster micrometers, but people get crazy bidding on them for $400-600 USD. I was thinking of just a regular digital micrometer (Mitutoyo). Thoughts?  Mahalo. Frank      
    • Yep, that's exactly how it should fit. The reamer shank is tapered and the socket in the spindle is also tapered so that the one centers in the other and is gripped tightly. If there is any wobble when the reamer is seated as far it will go then there is a problem. The cross hole in the spindle is to allow you the push the reamer back out again. If the reamer seated much deeper then it would limit the access for pushing it back out again. Here is one of mine for comparison.
×
×
  • Create New...