Jump to content

Cleaning


RogerH

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have another lovely Smiths Mantle Clock on the bench. the case is in good condition but inside it appears to have been drenched in some gunky oil and left in a garage!!

The time and chime trains have cleaned up ok but the back plate looks awful. it's been lacquered and is very dark as well as rusty. Would the Laquerre have been put on by the manufacturer? is this something that should been stripped off? I've not had one so grubby before so any good tips on how best to clean it would be much appreciated. 

In the picture shows you can see the right hand side which I've given a bit of a clean.

Smiths Plate.jpg

Smiths Plate2.jpg

Edited by RogerH
Photo added
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That flaking/corrosion at the holes is likely to spread oil. Sometimes you can remove lacquer with water-based cleaner like Elma 9:1 and perhaps with heating applied. On a later clock like that, I would personally use ultrasonic action too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rodabod said:

That flaking/corrosion at the holes is likely to spread oil. Sometimes you can remove lacquer with water-based cleaner like Elma 9:1 and perhaps with heating applied. On a later clock like that, I would personally use ultrasonic action too.

Thanks Rodabod....if only I had an ultrasonic cleaner 😉 I may try the Elma route and just strip it right back. As you say, the holes are already in quite a state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lacquer is put on at the time of manufacture. I don't recommend ultrasonic cleaners.   Horolene Clock Cleaning Concentrated Fluid is best make sure you completely  cover the plates. Nail varnish remover will also remove the lacquer.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

do I need to re-lacquer the plates afterwards or will a polish do - possibly the chalk method? I've looked up both Elma and Horolene and both do a similar job. tbh I'm leaning towards Horolene - I'll give it a go and let you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Horoline its ammonia based

you also want to be careful in that you mix it properly and it doesn't actually say in the instructions but I would not heat it up. Ammonia does a really beautiful job of cleaning but it can get carried away and start etching things you want to keep an eye on it.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panic not my friends, I'm not a complete novice with Ammonia based cleaner - I currently use Andrew Firth Cleaner which sounds pretty similar to the other versions and so far it's done quite a good job with cleaning. I've just generally cleaned the main plates by hand so as not to damage them - it was just that this particular plate is pretty bad and I didn't know if there was a better way. I'll send the pics when done.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't actually remember where I got it from but it seems pretty good. I now have some Horclean so I'll try that and compare.

Meanwhile see the final plate cleaned and buffed. It has a few historical scratches and marks but overall doesn't look too bad.

20210809_075005.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

That looks better. Never ever machine buff any part of any clock. it can cause irreversible damage. Making it nice and shiny will not make it work better.  

it was all done by hand, I just meant I buffed it up with a cloth. It's always satisfying when you take an old clock in a poor state and bring it back to life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rodabod said:

Looks nice and clean now. Did you lose the perlage finish? 

Sadly yes, it was all part of the lacquering so once that was gone it was just back to the smooth finish. So not as fancy but still a lot better than it was. Interesting though as I thought that sort of finish would have been part of the plate but once the lacquer was removed there was no sign of it. It maybe they put it on so as to make it look more expensive than it actually is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, barrel size.  A 11mm spring will push out into a 11mm barrel, no need to go 0.5mm smaller. 
    • Hello All, I’m looking for advice about how to interpret the mainspring specs described in the GR documents and in the catalogues of online sellers such as cousins.  My problem relates to interpreting the value describing barrel size - I’m unsure what the last number REALLY refers to.   For example: 1.10x.0105x360x11  (This refers to GR2628-X) Does the “ 11 “ here refer to the barrel inside diameter of the calibre OR to the diameter of the wound mainspring before insertion? For example if my measured barrel inside diameter to 11mm, I would normally select a wound spring size a little smaller, say 10.5, wouldn’t I?  Or, does the barrel diameter described in the catalogue specifications take that into account and I would therefore order a catalogue size 11 for an 11mm barrel ID? Hope this makes sense. I can’t find clarification of this anywhere. Many thanks for any enlightenment. Cheers, John
    • Let's say, like in a watch, you have  a 70 tooth 4th wheel, which needs to make a turn in one minute, with an 18,000 beat escapement. 15 tooth escape wheel as usual, and a 7 tooth pinion on it.   70 x 15 x 2 /  = 300  That's 300 beats, and there are 5 beats per second, so divide and you get 60s, one minute- all is well. If we do 70 x 15 x 2 / 8 that equals 262.5. With an 18K balance, which will let the escape wheel move one turn in 6 seconds, the 4th wheel will have made like 1.14 turns. So the time display is running fast. But this comes to like 7.5 seconds over per minute, which is about double your gain (maybe I'm wrong- I'm mathing on my phone while writing on my phone 😄) but pretty sure the gain is more than you are observing.   A possible culprit is that crown/4th wheel isn't running true, and a tooth is slipping past a pinion leaf once per revolution. I've seen this. If the platform is original and it's a nice piece they are often pinned, so the depthing isn't an issue. If the platform isn't pinned, check the depthing. And at any rate check the crown wheel between centeres and make sure the teeth are running true.
    • Fast responses - thank you. Yes, I mentioned the 18000bph to illustrate that it's not a matter of touching coils, over banking, shortened hairspring etc. I even took off the platform and temporarily fitted a another NOS one also with 8 leaves and beating 18000 but the colossal gain is the same. I'm resigned to buying and fitting a new Gorge platform plus a 7 leaf pinion escape wheel but only if I think it will work; otherwise it's a waste of £200 and a couple of hours work. Hence the underlying question is: all other things being equal, what would the timekeeping effect be? Is it a simple 7/8ths as fast? Logic tells me it is but can it be that linear?
    • Sorry to jump in here guys, but I've read through this whole thread and it seems there are a lot of people who think joining Facebook means everyone will have access to their lives. You could make a Facebook account with a fake name. You could even use your real name if you wanted to and set it to completely private so people can't even find you in a search and you don't have to add anyone as a 'friend', so you won't see anyone's posts. Literally use it to join a group full of members of this site. Admins could even set the group to private and require a password of some sort to gain acceptance into the group, so you can be sure that it's only members of this site that get in. @tomh207 is right, the form with email addresses and names is a bad idea. That will be abused by scrapers. Facebook is only as personal as you let it be. You can be completely anonymous on there if you wish. Don't think of it as Facebook. Just think of it as a watch repair group as that's all you'd use the account for. It doesn't even have to be set up with your current email address. Make a random one on Gmail or any other free provider just for the Facebook account. Tagged you by accident and now it won't let me remove it 😂 @Neverenoughwatches
×
×
  • Create New...