Jump to content

pocket watch mainspring dimensions and replacement


Recommended Posts

Hello Clock and Watchmakers,

I have an old key wound pocket watch where I think i should replace the main spring. I have a few questions here where i would love to read about you opinion.

I start with a statement or observation. The mainspring barrel of this watch had a "geneva stopwork", but it is broken now, possibly the owner used too much force with the winding key. Somebody has removed the maltese wheel when it was not functioning any longer. This video explains how the geneva stopwork helps with isochronism: geneva stopwork 

IMG_20210714_131516.thumb.jpg.50e826b752cf481c5cb252c203a084cb.jpg

First question which is probably the easiest one, is the end of the mainspring ok or is this the result of some creativity?

IMG_20210715_210845.thumb.jpg.0ab153898b6c44a733f3f7a6b5cdbe09.jpg

Second question. When i measured the mainspring height the outer coil was 1.98 mm and as you went in it got shorter and shorter and the inner coil is only 1.85 mm. Is this a manufacturing issue? Is this how a mainspring would wear out by touching the lid or the bottom of the barrel, would it wear out this way? Or is it just because it was designed in this way?

IMG_20210714_165159.thumb.jpg.7aa59e060c0efa522e12523d75749ecb.jpg

And my last question, would a modern alloy metal mainspring provide the same power as a blue steel providing both have the same dimensions? I always wondered on this one and it is a general question, not about this particular watch.

Best regards,

lui

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not worked on a Geneva but replacing the spring with a modern alloy spring should be fine. Noticed that the stop lever is a tiny bit bent this may cause issues. I am not sure how the mainspring is held in the barrel and I have not seen a new mainspring with that style of end. Someone who has had experience with a Geneva might be able to give advice.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, luiazazrambo said:

The mainspring barrel of this watch had a "geneva stopwork", but it is broken now, possibly the owner used too much force with the winding key. Somebody has removed the maltese wheel when it was not functioning any longer.

there is one other reason why it's missing a piece? at some time in the past when it was serviced either because somebody was lazy they didn't put it back on or they just didn't want to figure it out. So just never put it back together. It unfortunately is all too common that one or both pieces are missing.

12 hours ago, luiazazrambo said:

First question which is probably the easiest one, is the end of the mainspring ok or is this the result of some creativity?

that is one of the ways that people use to do ends. Or as you put it is basic creativity.

12 hours ago, luiazazrambo said:

When i measured the mainspring height the outer coil was 1.98 mm and as you went in it got shorter and shorter and the inner coil is only 1.85 mm. Is this a manufacturing issue?

though it should be the same with typically unless? If somebody got creative in other words they didn't have the right size mainspring and they modify it that's what you might be seeing.

then the general prevailing theory for most people is that modern mainsprings for the same thickness will be stronger then the original blued steel spring. But there's some other things that come into play that make download more complicated like the particular curvature the spring. So basically you really don't want to go any thicker than whatever you have now a lot of it will depend upon the escapement you have.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the the reason why one part of the geneva stopwork is missing is because the screw hole is worn, this is a common fault. That old mainspring needs to be replaced with a new one, it doesn't matter about the alloy that today's modern ones are made off. It isn't an expensive movement they are common, so it isn't going to affect its value. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My thinking is yes it is better if you were to choose this or a tg, although the tg can do more . This way the watch is adjusted specifically to you and your routine. As an example i restored an old Smiths pin pallet watch ( typically an inaccurate movement ) around 3 months ago. Adjusted through 5 positions on a tg initially proved ok but not precise over time.  Having then re- regulated the movement after each week of wearing over a period of 6 weeks brought the timekeeping in much closer, now within 1 minute/week
    • Hi everyone, I am Michael and I am completely new to the watch making world. After buying a mechanical watch a couple of years ago and realizing that the time keeping degraded significantly recently...I started digging and got fascinated by the topic!  I disassembled the watch with the Miyota 821a...and this gave the initial spark. Right now, the movement is still disassembled...and I am trying on a different movement my cleaning and lubrication before finalizing this project 😁 I am hoping to find help when I get lost and ask maybe some stupid questions - sorry for that in advance 😉 All the best, Michael 
    • As it is your watch the answer is yes! When regulating a watch for someone else there's no way we can tell in what environment the watch is used and how often the wearer of the watch will wind it. In that situation, a timing machine is a handy tool to get close to something that likely will be acceptable. As indicated by @tomh207 and @clockboy a timing machine is a great way to quickly determine the health of the movement. If you are considering a Weishi I'd recommend the 1900 model over the 1000 model as the 1900 has a gain setting. These machines work well but aren't foolproof. If you want something more advanced I'd recommend the PCTM software from @praezis.
    • Hi guys, I am completely new to watch making and currently I am iterating on my cleaning process to get it right. My current process is a 3 step cleaning routine in an ultrasonic cleaner and drying afterwards in a food dehydrator at 45°C. 10min wash with Elma Red 1:9 at 58°C 5min rinse in distilled water 2min rinse in IPA 99% 10min drying in a food dehydrator at 45°C I have an old ETA 2842 which I use to test the process and the cleaning in general works pretty good...but I found one strange thing during one run I did yesterday. After the 10min wash cycle in Elma Red 1:9, the bright silver balance shock jewel metal housing colored black. Do you have an idea what happened here? Thanks, best regards Michael  
    • I don't know if its pushing it in too far, but because the available batteries do not have a raised contact, clear of the case?  I'm not keen on the idea of soldering to a battery, but possibly stick a small washer or similar metal spacer on with conductive paint or adhesive, plus a nylon washer around it?  
×
×
  • Create New...