Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's really weird and unhelpful every single picture I can find conveniently has the crown in. I'm guessing of it had a case tube it would probably friction in? If it was a screw in the crown in your case might be threaded for that. Otherwise it seems like they would have something because usually military watches need to be water resistant.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

every single picture I can find

Yeah...same sentiment here.  I have searched high and low.  Keeping watch for a beat up (cheap) donor to buy to unravel this mystery.

Posted (edited)

DSC_5449.thumb.jpg.6756359e0a66d297d39d350d538f8233.jpg

May or may not be helpful, but here's an A-15. It was a prototype based on the A-11 with two rotating inner bezels. Obviously the case is different, but the close association and extremely limited run (500 for testing) would suggest it should be substantially similar.

EDIT: I misspoke slightly. The A-15 is based on the A-11, not A-17. Both are evolutions from the A-11, so they're more like siblings than parent/child.

Edited by spectre6000
  • Like 2
Posted

Please excuse the digression:

It's an incredibly cool watch. It was designed as a replacement for a chronograph for flight navigators that is cheaper to produce and maintain. Between the hack and the dual bezels, you can very easily emulate the functionality at a small fraction the cost. For better or worse, the thing Americans have done best is bring complex and expensive things to the masses. Sometimes it's by dumbing things down (cheese, "laht burr", etc.), sometimes it's via clever simplification (cars, manufacturing writ large, etc.). This is a beautiful example of that latter.

They only made 500 of them for testing purposes (the design was not adopted, which makes it a really weird design to pull out of the file cabinet for reproduction, but glad they did it). At least some of them were likely returned after the tests were completed, but some made it into the wild. Very few are out there, and I've never seen even a photo of one in very good shape. Bulova did a reproduction of sorts in 2014 as part of their then-new CEO's effort to push Bulova back upmarket via the AccuSwiss line. Bulova made cases with ETA movements (2824-2 in this particular case). He got canned pretty quick, and Citizen resumed flushing the brand down the toilet. They re-reissued it recently with a Miyota 82S6. The original was the same diameter as the watch it was based on plus the width of the inner bezels, making it a very modern 36 or 38mm in diameter. The AccuSwiss repro was 39.5mm (2824-2 + bezels), and the current one is 42mm (I assume there's a spacer since the Miyota is only 0.5mm wider than the ETA). 

It's a clever and functional watch with an interesting history from a once storied brand that fills the pilot watch slot in your watch collection while also being notably different from all the other identical fliegers out there. The 2824-2 version is especially attractive as the intersection between quality, parts availability, and price. I may be a little biased though (there's one on my wrist now)...

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I am still puzzling over this.  Here are some magnified pictures.  Not great, but it is what I can do. 

Based on my high-resolution inspection of both the inside and out, there was never a case tube.  Does that mean that the original crown tube fit inside the case in the winding position.  Seems odd...dunno.  How could it keep out moisture and dust.

Maybe there was a tube that has been completely pushed out (not shaved off).  That might make sense.  Maybe I should add one?

I need to buy a trinocular stereo microscope so I can mount a camera!!

2021-04-12 15_25_05-PIC074.JPG ‎- Photos.png

2021-04-12 15_25_33-REC007.AVI ‎- Photos.png

2021-04-12 15_25_23-PIC072.JPG ‎- Photos.png

2021-04-12 15_25_14-PIC073.JPG ‎- Photos.png

2021-04-12 15_24_57-PIC075.JPG ‎- Photos.png

2021-04-12 15_24_47-PIC076.JPG ‎- Photos.png

Posted

You might find the book found at the link below helpful. It's filled with military timepieces including wristwatch cases lots of pictures and drawings. I think I looked for your watch case in the book that I didn't see it doesn't mean it's not in there it just indexing of the book is really weird for looking things up. But it didn't look like not all of the cases had case tubes they had other arrangements.

https://www.amazon.com/Military-Timepieces-Marvin-Whitney/dp/0918845149

 

  • Like 1
Posted

OK, I decided to install a case tube and move on to find a crown. This tube came from the stuff my Dad left me.  It was a tad to big, so I turned it on the lathe.

I am learning...slowly...

2021-04-14 08_00_28-Photos.png

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/13/2021 at 4:44 AM, JohnR725 said:

You might find the book found at the link below helpful. It's filled with military timepieces including wristwatch cases lots of pictures and drawings. I think I looked for your watch case in the book that I didn't see it doesn't mean it's not in there it just indexing of the book is really weird for looking things up. But it didn't look like not all of the cases had case tubes they had other arrangements.

https://www.amazon.com/Military-Timepieces-Marvin-Whitney/dp/0918845149

 

I have that book, it does not give a parts diagram or specification for A17, only the photo of 1 watch that it says is non-waterproof.

It's hard to say for sure but looking at the pictures it does not appear to have a crown tube, unlike the A-11 that definitely does.

If you are interested in military timepieces made in the USA this is definitely the best book in the subject though.

  • Thanks 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...