Jump to content

Smiths Enfield Westminster mantel clock minute hand misaligned


Grandpa

Recommended Posts

I have a working mantel clock which keeps reasonably good time and chimes correctly on each quarter (4,8,12,16). It also rings the correct hour at the right time.

Problem is that the chiming sequence always happens 7 minutes before the minute hand reaches the correct position.

Upon investigation and comparison with an identical (but non-working) movement it would appear that the steel minute hand arbor has been fitted into the brass hour-hand cog incorrectly, about 7 degrees out of square.  (Screwdriver as pointer in pic)

I cannot think of any solution other than to dismantle the movement completely, carefully tap out the steel arbor and refit correctly?? All advice welcomed!!

IMG_9139.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not necessary. The alignment of the star wheel on the cannon pinion has gone out of sync. The star wheel is friction fitted and should be able to rotate with some careful persuasion. By sighting it and trial and error, you can resync so that it triggers every quarter correctly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

That's not necessary. The alignment of the star wheel on the cannon pinion has gone out of sync. The star wheel is friction fitted and should be able to rotate with some careful persuasion. By sighting it and trial and error, you can resync so that it triggers every quarter correctly. 

Thanks HL. I am new to this.  You mean if I grip that small cog firmly enough I should be able to twist the minute hand arbor inside it?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the center of the minute hand which in many is friction tight and it has moved which causes the chimes to be out of line with the dial.  you can repair this by putting the minute hand on a square file and move the hand center to the right place and then tighten the center with a few taps with a small hammer.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Grandpa said:

Thanks to all. I'll have a go later today with a welding torch, lump hammer and a monkey wrench

 

Job done. Many thanks everybody. I can be a bear with very little brain sometimes and it took me a while to realise that the minute hand is constructed from two pieces of brass crimped together - the square drive collet and the pointer itself - and the easiest way of achieving what I wanted was to modify their positions relative to each other.

 

Edited by Grandpa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think we've talked about this before, using a new mainspring to initially overcome the effects of more movement friction than there should be. The aim is to reduce all going friction not to push through the friction with more torque, that in the long run will create more wear.
    • Sensible precautions @rjenkinsgb. I remember as a lad, my mate's dad ran a garage. I can clearly remember watching him change break pads. He used an airline to blow the dust out, (when pads used asbestos), and  we used to practically bathe in "carbon tet". But then he did smoke about 40 cigs a day. Makes me shudder to think about it.
    • OK, a little bit more from today's lecture about the main springs. Generally, the spring in the barrel is limited and can't  unwind fully. With the blue line is shown the reserve/torque relation when spring unwinding is limited by the barrel. The green line represents the same when the spring is free to unwind fully And the red line shows the minimum torque that is needed for the movement to keep running. The yelow graph shows how the torque changes (from the blue) when the spring gets weaker (set) after 100 years of work. The purple line represents thinner and longer spring in the same barrel. As You can see, using thinner and longer spring will increase the power reserve. The 'set' spring will have the same reserve as a new one with the same sizes, only the amplitude will be just a little smaller.  Of course, this is true only when the movement othervice is in good health ( the red line is lo enough)
    • As long as you don't grind the stuff up and blow it around, you should be fine. Use a dust mask if in doubt.   The things I'm very careful of are: Radium lume - even the stuff that is visually completely dead and inert is still highly radioactive; it's the fluorescent part that decays, not the radium. A single speck inhaled or ingested can cause cancer, so store parts in zip bags and wear a dust mask & wipe your work area down after handling anything that uses it. A proper geiger counter is a good investment if you plan on working with vintage watches, so you can check for it & take appropriate precautions.   "One dip" & equivalents - the original type & the generic PERC dry cleaning fluid (Tetrachloroethylene / perchloroethylene) which is what the original one dip was mostly made of. That's toxic, a known carcinogen. Use in very good ventilation only & keep it sealed whenever possible.   The newer B-Dip is presumably a safer replacement.  
    • Only 137% !  sounds like you're not putting enough effort in 😆.  I would think of it like cogs on pushbike.  Fastest speed to the spindle would be largest pulley wheel on the drive and smallest pulley wheel on the driven. If the motor was into a sliding bed you would have 3x4 ? Speeds.
×
×
  • Create New...