Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I am working on a Valjoux 72 and can‘t really solve the following problem: After a complete disassembly, cleaning and re-assembly with correct lubrication I get the following results on the timegrapher:

Dial down: 320 degree

Dial up: 340 degree, sometimes starting knocking

 

Knocking at such high amplitude is no surprise, but why the high difference between DU and DD? I already checked the balance pivots, both clean and identical in shape. I also checked both incas, no jewel damage, clean and well lubricated (diameter of oil drop identical). The hairspring runs flat and doesn‘t touch anything.

 

So what could it be? Any help welcome. Thanks in advance.

 

Posted

How much endplay there is at the pallet and escape wheel? Between DD and DU even a small change in the area the pallet stones present to the escape teeth can introduce variances. 

  • Like 4
Posted
10 hours ago, Delgetti said:

So I am working on a Valjoux 72 and can‘t really solve the following problem: After a complete disassembly, cleaning and re-assembly with correct lubrication I get the following results on the timegrapher:

Dial down: 320 degree

Dial up: 340 degree, sometimes starting knocking

What were your readings before disassembly?

Posted

That's a lot of amplitude. I wonder if it has the correct mainspring; the 72 should have a spring 0.14mm thick. I've gotten replacements from suppliers in little packages marked V72 that were 0.15+, and had the watch rebanking.

 

Otherwise, lots of little things can cause a 20 degree difference in amplitude in the horizontal positions. As JDM and Joe say, check your endshakes. If they are excessive you can have things lining up differently enough between the two positions that you get what you're seeing. Another thing that can happen is a microscopic bit of dirt can find its way to the tip of the balance pivot and act like a ball bearing, giving you more amplitude. That is usually a problem with flatter pivots. Then just small variations in pivot shape can have an effect, and cap jewels can look fine until really closely inspected and you find that there is in fact a small bit of wear.

  • Like 2
Posted

Thanks for the replies so far. To give some information: Amplitude before strip down was 270 DD and DU but for the complete watch. The current 320/340 reading is just for the base movement, so I hope the additional friction of the wheels to come ( especially hour wheel with washer) will bring the thing into the non-knocking-area. I didn‘t replace the mainspring ( should do it on a chrono, i know, shame on me).

Hope to find some hours at the bench tomorrow, will check endshakes and the plate side balance bearing. 

Posted

I finally made it. No endshake issue, but a very tiny piece of dust on the escape wheel jewel. I have to improve cleanliness at the bench I think. Once again thank you for your help.

Posted

Good you solved this. Dust is in the air... we had a thread on possible ways to alleviate the problem in a small shop or at home.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
×
×
  • Create New...