Jump to content

Disassembly Assistance: Swiss Army Chrono Pro.


rizzag

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Jeff   near the keyless work there is a post with a small dimple just press this gently to release main stem, the others may have somthing of a similar nature or lifting the retainer bar,    Whats the make and caliber number  (near or under balance)

That worked for the main stem. The movement tilted out without it. The stop/start and reset stems stayed with the body. 
 

the only writing I see says:

 

25 Jewels

Twenty Five

Swiss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tudor said:

It’s a 7750 and the pushers are mounted to, and stay with, the case. 
 

You got it sorted. 
 

You might consider replacing the crown, pusher a d case back gaskets while it’s apart. 

Thank you! 
 

now, to get the lens out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That should come straight off. You need to get between the case and bezel to separate them. 
 

But first I’ll say you should have a crystal gasket before you disassemble this. Often they are not reusable. They leak if revised in my experience. 
 

but, get between there with a heavy razor blade- like for a utility knife- and work around the case carefully. You can scratch things easily here if you are not careful. 

Once it’s open enough, get a case knife in the gap, possibly against the razor side to protect the top of the case, and pry it off as evenly as you can. 

Perhaps the bezel will come without disturbing the seal ring. In that case, you can polish the bezel and reinstall (you’ll need a press of some sort for that) and it might be okay. Protect the sides of the seal with tape if you decide to touch up the case too. In an earlier post on my Seamaster 300, I show how to get straight, even “brushing” finish on the case sides. 

Edited by Tudor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
    • I think we all get a lot out of this group, and it has been pivotal in my development by the sharing of knowledge, experience and learning from more seasoned experts such as @JohnR725 and others (you know who you are!) as well as fellow novices. I think that having a backup communication plan in reserve so that if there is a future problem just makes good sense. I don't think anyone is trying to undermine the forum, but if something unthinkable happens, like the Ranfft website for example, then it would be good if those who are willing can still keep in contact. Speaking personally, and I know I risk a charge of heresy, it would be good if Mark could be a little more visible in this forum, and maybe give any insight from time to time on the future/progress of forum and instructional videos etc. even if its just to confirm the status quo. I appreciate he is a busy man with a full time job, but so are most of the rest of us and to post a few lines every now and then shouldn't be too much to ask to reassure the restless villagers. Best outcome for me would be a message saying something along the lines of: "Hi guys, all good, no planned changes... enjoy the forum, will message again next month!" Just my two cents.
    • A nice looking watch !! Did you try 9010, instead of the 9415, on the pallet jewels / escape wheel? And if you did, did you notice a difference?
    • Knocked out another 404 last night...when you are in the zone! This watch was a non-runner which I picked up as part of a lot of 8 watches, so works out to be $3.12 per watch. Before:   And the finished watch, new crown and stem and the crystal was cracked so was replaced. I also replaced the mainspring as the original was the old steel type spiral and very 'set' - all else is original: The Movement was a AS 1686, but in reading around a little the ACCRO watch company were sued for their use of the five point crown on their Jacques Pere range as it resembled Rolex, see below: ACCRO then reverted to just ACCRO on their watches - I have done some sniffing around the internet and haven't seen another example of ACCRO and the crown together on a dial so maybe I have something unusual, or maybe I was looking in the wrong places 🙂.  
    • This watch was damaged when I got it. I didn't break the escape wheel pivot, and I bodged a fix with epoxy to see if I could get it running. I'm not yet ready to get into lathe work, or shellacking jewels, and may never be. But I'm learning plenty with each watch I tackle. 
×
×
  • Create New...