Jump to content

Eta 2512-1 Movement


Recommended Posts

This is probably the smallest movement I've worked on & the 4039 holder that arrived yesterday rather dwarfs it! (Btw, I tried the carbon fibre version which was £1 dearer than the steel but it is quite nice.)

Official ETA diameter is 17.2mm.

post-687-0-55391700-1424560535_thumb.jpg

Here the dial has been removed & next the minute train bridge & minute wheel/setting wheel:

post-687-0-83618300-1424560638_thumb.jpg

Incidentally, the minute wheel is driven independently by the third wheel - you can see it's jewel at 8 o'clock in the middle.

The barrel, train & pallet bridges are nicely plated rather than plain steel & is signed:

post-687-0-72185500-1424560929_thumb.jpg

post-687-0-88627500-1424560961_thumb.jpg

The large parts are soaking in solvent overnight....lets hope I can get it back together tomorrow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Old Topic, but I am working on a 2512-1 right now.  Somehow, I failed to note where/how the intermediate wheel lower pivot seats.  I feel I am missing something, but my pictures taken upon dis-assembly do not show the lower pivot point for this wheel.  It is the wheel overriding the barrel in the picture.  Advice please!

 

Thanks,


RMD

IMG_20190112_145438172.jpg

Edited by rduckwor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never mind.  I found it.  Strangely there is a non-jeweled bearing press fit into the main plate below and just off the edge of the MS barrel.  Teeny, tiny.  I overlooked it the first time thru.  Getting the pivot into that tiny hole with the other wheels and barrel in place was a test of patience.  Its done and the train runs!!  Whew!!

 

RMD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I am aware of the age of this thread.

I just got through servicing a predecessor to the 2512-1, the 2512.  I too was sort of baffled when I looked for the lower pivot for that wheel. And yes, it is a bit of a bear to situate. Fortunately, I had honed my chops on such things by working on some Accutrons recently and dealing with their index wheels.

The only issue I'm having is that the watch still has hangups at the click. I'm pretty sure that a little lubricant under the rather unconventional click will fix it up. Cheers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrRoundel said:

I am aware of the age of this thread.

I just got through servicing a predecessor to the 2512-1, the 2512.  I too was sort of baffled when I looked for the lower pivot for that wheel. And yes, it is a bit of a bear to situate. Fortunately, I had honed my chops on such things by working on some Accutrons recently and dealing with their index wheels.

The only issue I'm having is that the watch still has hangups at the click. I'm pretty sure that a little lubricant under the rather unconventional click will fix it up. Cheers.

 

When releasing the mainspring power via the combined click and spring, it can be quite easy to bend the combined click and spring out of shape. The combined click and spring will then not hold the ratchet wheel properly. You may have to bend it slightly so that it engages the ratchet wheel properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ETA 2512 doesn't have the, what I see as improved, one-piece spring/click combination. It has a relatively low tension spring that interacts with a click that has small nubs on the bottom of the click-arm that protrude into holes in the plate.

I'm still fighting with this thing. The spring goes out of position with the slightest movement of the click while trying to situate the ratchet wheel. It's maddening, to be sure. I'm about to buy a new spring in the hopes that it will hold better. Truth be told, the existing one looks fine, but it has a hair trigger. Cheers.

 

 

8B5DE13B-4195-4CF7-91E4-5506D8E734DF.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I kind of think the same, the surface under the oil is the same as the surface around the oil. Can epilame both repel and attract , that doesn't quite make sense in simple terms, but is it more complicated than that.
    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
    • I think we all get a lot out of this group, and it has been pivotal in my development by the sharing of knowledge, experience and learning from more seasoned experts such as @JohnR725 and others (you know who you are!) as well as fellow novices. I think that having a backup communication plan in reserve so that if there is a future problem just makes good sense. I don't think anyone is trying to undermine the forum, but if something unthinkable happens, like the Ranfft website for example, then it would be good if those who are willing can still keep in contact. Speaking personally, and I know I risk a charge of heresy, it would be good if Mark could be a little more visible in this forum, and maybe give any insight from time to time on the future/progress of forum and instructional videos etc. even if its just to confirm the status quo. I appreciate he is a busy man with a full time job, but so are most of the rest of us and to post a few lines every now and then shouldn't be too much to ask to reassure the restless villagers. Best outcome for me would be a message saying something along the lines of: "Hi guys, all good, no planned changes... enjoy the forum, will message again next month!" Just my two cents.
    • A nice looking watch !! Did you try 9010, instead of the 9415, on the pallet jewels / escape wheel? And if you did, did you notice a difference?
    • Knocked out another 404 last night...when you are in the zone! This watch was a non-runner which I picked up as part of a lot of 8 watches, so works out to be $3.12 per watch. Before:   And the finished watch, new crown and stem and the crystal was cracked so was replaced. I also replaced the mainspring as the original was the old steel type spiral and very 'set' - all else is original: The Movement was a AS 1686, but in reading around a little the ACCRO watch company were sued for their use of the five point crown on their Jacques Pere range as it resembled Rolex, see below: ACCRO then reverted to just ACCRO on their watches - I have done some sniffing around the internet and haven't seen another example of ACCRO and the crown together on a dial so maybe I have something unusual, or maybe I was looking in the wrong places 🙂.  
×
×
  • Create New...