Jump to content

Is an Omega crystal too necessary?


DanB

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Is it necessary to use a recommended Omega tool (as written on the case back), such as "tool 105" or "tool 107" to remove an original Omega crystal and gain access to the movement? Or, can I simply use my Bergeon crystal lift? I have used the Bergeon on other front loading watches (non-Omega) in which the watch's case back recommend the use of a specific tool without any problems. Of course, those crystals were easily replaced (at about $4) should there be an issue. With this Omega watch I'm referencing, the crystal has the Omega logo in its center so I assume it is the original crystal.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the easiest way to get an answer to the question is try it what's the harm that could happen?

sometimes googling is interesting like next link looks like they doing exactly what you wish to do? Basically Omega has a nice tool to take the crystal off without scratching it up unfortunately we don't all have those nice tools.

http://old-omegas.com/tool107.html

if the crystal has the omega symbol inside that tells you it's a original omega crystal.

1 hour ago, DanB said:

Of course, those crystals were easily replaced (at about $4) should there be an issue

no have to tell us where you do your shopping and you can get GNU one regional crystals at that price as seems really cheap? In case it's a replacement crystal we've discussed these before and vague memory isn't some people think it may not work. It may depend a course on who made the replacement crystal. That also pay attention to the inside metal ring Omega a lot of times has a slightly different shape than the generic one. It becomes more of a problem if the crystal is used to hold the movement in the watch. As opposed to normal crystal with the metal ring which just is a crystal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, that's a cool method, worth trying just for the fun of it. Then to reinstall probably best to use a crystal press. I've not used one yet, just the Bergeon, but I think it's time to invest in one anyway.

Thanks so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...