Jump to content

Ronda 775 slow date change?


Recommended Posts

I have a Ronda 775 quartz movement here and the date wheel starts moving at about 23:30 and snaps into position  just after 12:00, quick date set works as expected.
Is this 30 minute date change normal or is there something that needs repairing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, that's normal. I've come to the conclusion that a lot of watch companies have the date change start before midnight because you already know the date. Quick Google search showed that the movement probably does not cost more than $20 so I wouldn't expect it to having instantaneous change.

Sent from my BBF100-2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Its Seiko Epson unit   but  they all change there or there    about  I have seen some that start a 11.45 and complete about 12 15.  It takes a little while for the wheel to over come the the detent on the up hill path and then snaps in on the down path.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should have checked it before I started. Although I am almost certain that the slow change is right. I would imagine that the change is either instantaneous or slow. It would have to be a magic fault to change the date slowly and snap at midnight.

I know nothing about quartz movements but I am kind of shocked. I used to have a quartz Seiko perpetual calendar 20 years ago and that used to change instantaneously at midnight. This movement is in an expensive Tag Heuer watch and I wasn't expecting the date to change slowly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lwayslate said:

Also usually the manual date corrector uses a different mechanism than the time keeping date change drive, hence the difference in action.

Sent from my BBF100-2 using Tapatalk
 

Very much the same as mechanical Seiko movements. I wasn't expecting the same from a quartz movemet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PeterS said:

II used to have a quartz Seiko perpetual calendar 20 years ago and that used to change instantaneously at midnight.

That is 4F/8F modules have a motor dedicated to the (perpetual) date function, and no manual quick setting.

1 hour ago, PeterS said:

This movement is in an expensive Tag Heuer watch and I wasn't expecting the date to change slowly.

Expensive for the buyer but cheap for TH to manufacture. Torque, especially in quartz module, is a limited and very valuable resource, you need more torque to ramp up against the slope of an instantaneous change mechanism. Unfortunately in mechanical mov't more torque means fitting a  stronger mainspring, that is thicker, so you have to sacrifice power reserve with a same size barrel size. Result, we have the much revered ETA 2824-2 beating 28.800, instantaneous date change, and 38 hours power reserve. Compare to the humble Seiko 7S26/4R which deliver 42 hours, with the compromise of slower beating rate (which actually will make it last longer), and a date and day which is so slow, to cause  a great nightly discomfort to the OCD buyer.
On quartz modules torque is not there at all, so either add some comlication to accumulate torque, or fit an additional motor.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I know what to expect from quartz watches. If I didn't used to own the Seiko with a snappy change at midnight I probably wouldn't even think about it as I'm used to mechanical Seikos. I never knew/thought about the torque required for the date change, thanks for the explanation.
I've returned the watch and the owner is happy with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...