Jump to content

EMRO watch gaining time.


Bod

Recommended Posts

My step grandson has just inherited this Emro 23 jewel, shockproof, waterproof, antimagnetic, swiss made watch.

It has a gain in time of 9 minutes in every 26 hours.

Being a clock person rather than a watch person, can you help, is there a "slow-Fast" adjustment inside the case?

An idea of the age of the watch, as I can find very little via Google, except that it may be 60's-70's.

 

221390407_IMG_0130-Copy(2).thumb.JPG.ad8ff70d7d8630b7d5eb0d28cf210d4f.JPG1527105748_IMG_0138-Copy(2).thumb.JPG.e4984500dd15a21f7746a459c595f352.JPG

The markings on the back are the same as the dial, plus it's been "Diamond tooled, electronically tested, and Tropicalized"

Now what is "Tropicalized"?

Disregard the strap, that has been only recently fitted, I don't know what it had before.

Any information will be gratefully received by the grandson.

Thanks

Bod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Len33 said:

The first thing to try, is to demagnetise the watch.

How would I go about doing this?

I have an Eclipse 955 demagnetiser, just a case of passing the watch over it a couple of times, or will it need dismantling?

Thanks

Bod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to dismantle.

Pass the watch, side to side, over the demagnetiser for about ten seconds.

Then, slowly distance the watch from the demagnetiser to about one metre distance.........before switching the demagnetiser off.

If necessary, try again. 

Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still gaining.

I've removed the back.

965964799_SAM_0007(2).JPG.2f5bee8ec80b4fd72fc0f1ef21024768.JPG

To my eye, there is nothing special to see.

No serial numbers, only "Swiss 23 jewels"

There is a +/- for the hair spring, which I have moved slightly to the -, but too far and the lever interferes with a wheel.

The inside is clean, no rust or dust.

I've retried the demagnetiser, now I just wait to see if any thing changes.

Value wise, I don't think this should be put on the house insurance as a valuable item.  Unless you know different...

Thanks

Bod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bod   If its no better have a close look at the hairspring ,   are the coins sticking together during oscillation, is the spring flat and not catching the bridge, is the spring hanging up in the the reculator ( no moving between the pins) all these will affect the timing .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As demagnetising didn't provide a cure, the hair spring would be the area to concentrate on, first.

As it was 'inherited,' it's possible that, in the past, someone had oiled it and a tiny drop of oil has found its way onto the hair spring......causing a coil stick.

(Something that could be easily overlooked)

If you are sure that everything is ok there, then (If mine) I would take the watch apart; clean/lubricate it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been adjusting the regulator arm, this has now got the watch running less than 4 minutes slow over 24 hours, and is as good as it's going to get, with out a full clean and service. (which is way beyond  my eyesight!)

I do fear despite it being "shock proof" a knock will upset the time keeping.  But at least we know what to do.

Many thanks to all who have replied, you have been a great help.

 

Bod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...