Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

   Its been a long time since I posted anything but I've ran into an issue that's a little different. I'm repairing a Rolex datejust with a 1570 movement. The watch has been exposed to a lot of moisture. The date ring itself is discolored and paint is separating from it. I have obtained a replacement. Now the issue is the date seating ring has some rust.  Two of the screws that hold it in place were badly rusted but I was able to remove them.  The real issue is one of the tabs on the date seating ring that hold the calendar ring in place has rusted and is preventing the calendar ring from moving properly. I have looked for a replacement part and it is expensive and hard to find.  The ones I have seen seem like they might have the same problem. I was wondering if it is possible to knock out the rusted tab and replace it with something? There is a hole underneath the seating ring where the tab is so I'm assuming it is just friction fitted. Any ideas would be much appreciated, especially if anyone has dealt with this issue before.

Thanks,

Charles 

Posted (edited)

What about a couple of pictures to help others understand what is clear to you - the only one being able to see the issue?

Edited by jdm
Posted

Hello C k, been nearly two years, time flies whan you are chasing bears or the bear chases you. lol 

Good thing you are in lathe country, lathe pays for itself really.

Has the rust pitted the groove, I am thinking if sand paper can do the trick, fine grade sand paper if used almost down to the paper makes a good buffer for the finish.

 You said " replace it with something else" what do you plan to use instead? 

Can you camera accesss to show the rusted area. 

keep safe.

Posted

Here are a few pictures. It may be hard to see but the tab in question is at around the 14 or 15 date marker. I'm using the old calendar ring to show the original rust. I have found a solution by the way. What I did was use the old date ring and held it and rotated it around the seating ring. I finally felt a bit of resistance near the rusted tab. I then held the ring sideways and used a microscope and found a bit of build up near the jewel under the tab.  I took a toothpick and cleaned it out and now it seems like it will work. I still don't like that rusted tab as I'm afraid that it may give way eventually. 

  I do log in once in awhile to see if I can be of any help to anyone but most of the time others have already answered the questions. I should still make notes of what I run in to as it could  be helpful to others but once I get involved in things I forget.

Thanks everyone,

Charles  

DSCN3964.JPG

DSCN3965.JPG

Posted

By expensive you mean about $160? I notice one on eBay when I did a search it looks like it's in a really nice condition.

When I was looking for your part online I did find one missing the discs? This implies that they come out perhaps. The Rolex parts listings are weird because the 1570 refers you back to the base caliber of 1530 neither listings indicate this ring? But if you go to the 15 75 which has a base caliber 1530 the ring is there. So on that listing where we can see the ring you can see the other part that I highlighted the stud and I think that's what you're looking for.

In any case if that's your problem and you  don't want to pay to get a replacement then I would push it out and see if you can polish it.

Rolex 1575.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi,

 Thanks John, Just wondering where you found this part? I had already checked on Jules Borel site through the 1530, 1560 and 1570 and found nothing. Went back and checked 1575  there and still no luck. I had thought of pushing it out and rotating it around to get more coverage of date ring with the stud but it's so thin and rusted I was afraid that it would just fall apart. If picture were better you would see that instead of a small arc of the stud covering the date ring there is just a small piece of it left in that area.

Thanks.

Posted

It would really be nice to have a PDF service manual but they don't exist or at least I don't have one. Attaching the parts manuals for the 1575 and 1575 GMT. Here's where things get really confusing then I have a link for the 1575 GMT where it has the stud Holder. But I also have some text below because the stud holder is also the thing that holds the hairspring. That's why has a screw associated with it and the only reason I'm pasting that below so that if you find those numbers you know what therefore and don't get confuse like I'm getting confused.

Then I was looking at the best fit online and they had another number the 7958 which agrees with our PDF. Of course they have a different name for the part which makes things confusing. Then that part number cross references to four separate Rolex movements.

So currently on eBay and looking at a part titled 1525-7958  Stud for Date Indicator $45 for several of them it looks like the part in the horrible parts list picture. So my best guess for what it's worth is that is probably what you're looking for. So unless you push out the one you have the verify that it looks similar and possibly were still guessing.

Then I'm being really bothered by something so the first link below Rolex 1570. But according to the variations over on the right-hand side the 15 75 has the date. That would explain why can't find calendar parts for the 1570 because the calendar parts would be for the 1575 In which case if that's the case then the part is the correct part.

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Rolex_1570

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=ROL_1575_GMT

ROL 1570    MIS/2018    8103    STUD HOLDER  hairspring
ROL 1570    MIS/2149    7978    STUD HOLDER  screw for 8103 as a guess

ROL 1575    AUT/4250    7958    DATE DIAL


AUT/4250   Factory Number:7958
ROL 1525
ROL 1565
ROL 1565 GMT
ROL 1575

 

 

Rolex_Rolex 1575GMT NEW.pdf Rolex_Rolex 1575 NEW.pdf

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...