Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, everyone

Please could someone help me with a basic question as I live on a remote Uk island with no watchmakers.

I am about to replace the ETA 955412 movement in my 1992Tagheuer 6000. (See picture)

I have removed the Tag stem from the old broken movement and before removing the (temporary stem ?) and inserting my tag stem into new ETA I wanted to ensure I have the stem in the correct position and if battery should be in.

I have read conflicting stem positions on line hence the question.

Thanks for reading any help would be appreciated.

Gary

1BAEFCE5-2941-4E7C-929C-726E82B31B83.jpeg

Posted

Hi Gary at all times unless testing the movement leave the battery out, whilst manipulating the stem into position .  It will be best to use the stem provided with the module. some of the modules require you to put the stem into set position before removing as this keeps the clutch assembly and associated gears in place to enable an easy fit of the stem. Failure to do so causes the clutch to drop requiring re alignment before the new stem can be fitted. To do that you need to remove the calendar work to gain access to the keyless work.  I have attached the tech sheet which covers this movement for you.        good luck

ETA 955.102, 955.112, 955.122, 955.132, 955.402, 955.412, 955.422, 955.432.pdf

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thank you for answering . Please excuse my ignorance on this subject 

Do mean it’s best to use the stem with the Plastic crown that came with the movement?

And please could you let me know what the ‘set’ position is ?

regards

Posted

In the event you need a time-sensitive answer, I'd guess that watchweasol did mean to use the stem that came with the replacement movement. Perhaps that is because it will not have wear on it that the old one will have. It probably won't matter much though, providing the watch it was in was winding and setting well before replacing it. If you use the new stem you will likely have to cut the stem a touch and fit the crown.

"Set" position means with the stem pulled out in the position to set the hands.

Good luck.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Personally, with a screw-down crown like that, I’d just re-use it as is. It may be thread-locked in place. 
 

I always aim to keep them in the inner stem position when removing, but it’s not essential. Gently twist the stem when you insert the new one. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thank you all for your response I appreciate your help

it looks like the stem position does seem to split opinions or may not be important.

i will be doing the switch later this week, so I’ll need some luck.

Anyone else willing to offer any advise, I’m all ears and will take onboard.

regards And thanks again 

Gary

Posted

My best piece of advice for that movement is to use a screwdriver blade which is wider than the stud that you press to release the stem. This controls what depth you press it to. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Gary55 said:

I have removed the Tag stem from the old broken movement and before removing the (temporary stem ?) and inserting my tag stem into new ETA I wanted to ensure I have the stem in the correct position and if battery should be in.

If you wish to use the new stem (not necessary if the one you have is undamaged) you can unscrew the plastic crown and replace it with the TAG crown. However, the TAG crown may be more or less glued to the threads of the original stem so that could possibly pose a challenge. You would probably also have to shorten the new stem using a cutter tool like this and you would possibly need to file the sharp edges after the cut (a simple flat diamond file works well for this). It's a bit fiddly...

The battery should always be removed while working on the movement. Replace the battery (preferably with a new) just before replacing the case back.

There is no "correct position" except the square section of the stem must be fitted into the square hole of the sliding pinion (AKA clutch wheel) so while inserting the stem, apply a little pressure on the crown towards the center of the watch while gently rotating the crown a bit back and forth until it goes in (into the square hole of the sliding pinion which you can't see). Unlike when you remove the stem, you will not have to depress the setting lever button when you replace the stem. Just shove it in! You can see exactly how the stem fits into the winding stem here.

You might find my ETA 955.112 service walkthrough useful. I believe it is identical with the 955.412!?

Good luck!

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you all for your help and advice, couldn’t ask for more.

i will be attempting the re build later this week hopefully, I’ll post how I got on .

kind regards Gary

Posted

I’d just like to add that what WW says is very relevant to this forum. Opinions do differ sometimes, and it can be hard to know sometimes what is best based on other opinions alone. In reality, you have to let experience decide for you in the long term. It may also be that your practical “style” defines how you work. 
 


 

  • Like 1
Posted

Success !! with your  help and minimal tools, I managed to get my watch up and running again.

thank you all very much

i put new hands on that look a bit overly (old hands lume had fallen off ) with the new lume compared to the patina on the face. I could not for the life of me get the new second hand on, but original went on easy.

really happy at the mo, hope it all doesn’t fall apart .

cheers Gary

39FE88B9-FFF0-4857-8523-1E5E9C34DACC.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...