Jump to content

1 inch = 1 inch = 1 inch


jdm

Recommended Posts

With a conventional mechanical micrometer, like the ones shown, while the zero point with the anvil closed can be set up by the operator using the small 'C' spanners usually provided with the instrument,  the ultimate accuracy along it's operational measuring length is determined by the pitch accuracy of the lead screw in the barrel, there is usually means of tightening the nut to lead screw pressure with an adjustable collet arrangement on the nut. If you are attempting to work to tenths of a thousandths of an inch, ambient temperature will make a small difference to accuracy.

I have this fairly ancient 'Draper' 0-4" caliper mic. set that has the replaceable anvils and the set up test pieces, which specify length accuracy at 20 degrees C.

Draper micrometer.jpg

Edited by JohnD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just did some tests on my Roebuck digital caliper, using the Draper test pieces....

For each test I closed the caliper first and checked the 0.000" reading then opened it up and placed the test piece in and closed it till it was lightly clamping it...

1" Test.... spot on

 

2" Test....minus one thou

 

3" Test....minus 5 tenths of a thou

Ambient temperature 28C

Quite pleased with this :thumbsu:

 

 

Roebuck caliper 1 inch test.jpg

Roebuck caliper 2 inch test.jpg

Roebuck caliper 3 inch test.jpg

Edited by JohnD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I literally just watched this comparison video the other day between watching videos on casemaking.. I'd have liked to have seen a comparison done on both sets of jaws as internal measurement is often less nice than external. The cheap measuring tools are good enough for their purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The plate is OK, thanks. It seems the answer to my question is that this is a 'hack' & for me another reminder that in general, one won't be the first person to be tinkering with an old timepiece!. As you day, I've been fortunate to have gotten some good advice and, just as important, encouragement. I've been lucky then not to have the balance spring break as a result of my novice 'ministrations' - but I did remember to 'stroke' rather than bend per se. The clock is of sentimental value to the owner so I'm relieved to have now got it running to time with the support & encourage of forum members like yourself.
    • Thanks ww, its maybe not as much of a bodge trick that i thought it was. 
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement.  It would be nice if you told us a little about yourself.
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement.  Can we help with what you are trying to  figure out? 
    • In think you are effectively shortening the coil by shorting out damaged tracks. In my case as long as the continuity was good and the resistance not too greatly affected it should be ok .  One was on an era  movement,
×
×
  • Create New...