Jump to content

Selecting correct balance staff for Elgin 18s pocket watch?


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I'm trying to select the correct replacement balance staff for a 1911 Elgin 18s grade 336 pocket watch (SN# 15636551). According to the Pocket Watch Database, the Elgin part number is 857, but I have to select either long hub, short hub, or pivot 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15. I'm not sure which is the correct part for this watch and was hoping someone might be able to advise? I have the original staff on hand if that helps. Thank you in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, It is best I have found is to take as many measurements as possible from the old balance before ordering the wrong one, which I have done so many times !!!.  Then use this site which gives the staff dimensions. 

https://www.balancestaffs.com/elgin.php

Another site that is a really good source for staffs is:

https://www.vintagewatchparts.net/?s=elgin&post_type=product&product_cat=0

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As already mentioned by clockboy One of the first things to do is measure everything on the staff. For instance you already know there's a difference in pivots size so providing you still have pivots you can measure those.

Then other things to try would be to make an assumption that you are not the first with this problem? So for instance you could do a search of this discussion group and see if anyone else has had the same staff problem? Then you'd find the link below. Armed with your measurements and the information below you should Be able to figure out which staff you need.

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/3568-elgin-balance-staff-identification/

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now I'm making do with a similar micrometer (the one below is $45 shipped but you can find better deals) and a $20 stand. You do have to be excruciatingly careful measuring jewels, since there's no table, but if you don't have the $500 to throw around, it's a nice option.
    • As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!
    • Next one up an AS 554, looks like a bit more to this one. First job is to check thickness, most springs are somewhere between .3 and .4, this one measures .35, that matches in with the .4 spring steel i ordered. So for marking up a permanent marker comes in handy to colour up the steel to be marked later with a scriber once its dry. Bestfit provide the extra bit of info for the jumper spring that is missing.
    • Thanks again, Marc.  Super helpful. I was wondering what the hole was for, and now it makes perfect sense. With your help and the other members here, it looks like I'm good to go with my Seitz tool set. I had to order some replacement pushers, but with those, the set is complete and in good condition. Now, I need to figure out what tool to buy to measure jewels (amongst other watch-related parts). I had my eye on the JKA Feintaster micrometers, but people get crazy bidding on them for $400-600 USD. I was thinking of just a regular digital micrometer (Mitutoyo). Thoughts?  Mahalo. Frank      
    • Yep, that's exactly how it should fit. The reamer shank is tapered and the socket in the spindle is also tapered so that the one centers in the other and is gripped tightly. If there is any wobble when the reamer is seated as far it will go then there is a problem. The cross hole in the spindle is to allow you the push the reamer back out again. If the reamer seated much deeper then it would limit the access for pushing it back out again. Here is one of mine for comparison.
×
×
  • Create New...