Jump to content

Timex Q movement swap


philipk65

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,  I have a 1980 Timex Q quartz watch that was a graduation gift and hasn't worked in 20 years (battery corroded).

I bought a working one off of EBay and want to swap to movement. I've seen online all it takes is pulling the crown/stem out and the movement, face and all

comes right out. Not this timex. I looks like there is a ridge round the case and some sort of metal fingers at need to be bend to remove movement?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!  Thanks!   Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, philipk65 said:

Hi Everyone,  I have a 1980 Timex Q quartz watch that was a graduation gift and hasn't worked in 20 years (battery corroded).

I bought a working one off of EBay and want to swap to movement. I've seen online all it takes is pulling the crown/stem out and the movement, face and all

comes right out. Not this timex. I looks like there is a ridge round the case and some sort of metal fingers at need to be bend to remove movement?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!  Thanks!   Kevin

The 'metal fingers' hold the dial onto the movement..........

This watch, like most of, if not all, of Timex's early quartz watches , is a 'front loader', in that the movement comes out of the front of the case, after removing the crystal. On some the front bezel has to be prized off to remove the crystal, on others the acrylic crystal has to be removed with a crystal puller, like this:-

P6vY69W.jpg

With these ones it is obvious as the crystal has a high dome and pronounced vertical section that protrudes above the watch case, that the jaws of the puller engage on....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  Thats better although the one of the movement is a bit out of focus.  Judging by the dial there has been water/moisture ingress.    Is there a model number on the back.    It does look as though the movement is removed through the front.  As JohnD mentioned  you will need a crystal lifter to remove the crystal and then the movement.  I am not familiar with these at all, but to remove the stem look for a release lever, pull the stem out and observe how it is locked in place. Some require you to lift the release lever and others require a pair of tweezers to open the locking spring. I recall that it was shown in an earlier post so have alook via the search in the top right under timex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

The pictures are showing the M42 movement in your grandfathers original watch.  I actually have one and it's a unique movement since it only advances once per minute so if you had it open and put a new battery in it you need to wait a minute before you hear the sound of the advance of the minute hand.  Timex only made them for two years. Notice it doesn't have a second hand because it's not needed.  You can find more information here on the movement https://17jewels.info/movements/t/timex/timex-m43/  I have attached a couple of pictures of my 1990 Quartz with the M42 movement.

IMG_1042.jpg

IMG_1043.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅
    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
    • Has it got a beat adjustment on the platform or is it a fixed hairspring? in short what you are looking at to get it just about in beat is to get the roller jewel sitting dead centre between the banking pins. So remove the platform and take of the pallet fork and escape wheel to give you clear line of site, sit the platform with the balance in place and with it level look between the banking pins and see if the roller jewel is sitting between them, if it is nice and central its there or there abouts in beat, if its not the the position of the pinned end of the hairspring needs to be adjusted to move the roller jewel into the correct position, thats why I asked if it has an adjustment on the platform or not, if it has its an easier job. 
    • I've managed to adjust it. I'm going to try and explain it as well as I can with my limited horology knowledge but I hope it helps someone in the future. There is a cam to the right of the front plate as shown in the picture. As the clock ticks along, the pin indicated in the gear comes around and slots into one of the silencer cam gaps, turning the cam. The pin completes a full rotation in 2 hours. To adjust the cam to start at the right time set the clock to just before 7. I did 6:45. Then I turned the silencer cam anticlockwise, which spins freely, until it pushed the silencer lever up and was placed just before the drop. Just before the 7AM indicated in the picture. All I then had to do was progress the hands to 7-7:15which made the pin slot into the silencer cam gap and turn the cam so the lever comes down again, unsilencing the clock. That was it. If anyone comes across this issue again I'd be happy to assist. Thanks again to everyone that helped. Hey Transporter! Thanks a lot for the reply. That was a really good explanation and I'm sure it would have made my troubleshooting a lot less painful haha. I'm sure someone will find it useful in the future. Thank you again for taking the time to try and help me out with this.
    • Now I'm completely confused, it would appear that the epilame  is oleophobic  as @Marc states: This oleophobic  behavior can be seen as beading of the droplet (as above) which stops the oil spreading which is supported by what we observe on treated/untreated cap stones (for example), but as @VWatchie states this should make the drops more mobile and is supported by the literature:   A review on control of droplet motion based on wettability modulation principles design strategies recent progress and applications.pdf   However the whole point is that we have less mobile oil so an oleophobic  would see to be the opposite of what we want. In fact this beading and high mobility are desirable properties in things like smart phone covers, see below.  I am fairly sure that epilame doesn't make the droplets more mobile, so maybe its a strange coating with dual properties that are both oleophobic (beading) and cohesive/adhesive resulting in low mobility?? This may explain the high price??  
×
×
  • Create New...