Jump to content

Old Iwc "fishtail" Cal.72

MortenS
 Share

Recommended Posts

MortenS Watch Enthusiast

MortenS

Posted
Posted

Hi,

 

Some time ago I was asked to look at a pocket watch in gold that was going to be repaired before it was going for sale. The pocket watch could not be wind up, so there was something wrong with the mainspring or the stem.

 

IMG_1499_zpsa1b37451.jpg

Sadly the dial got a crack at one time, but the case was nice. The crown was not in gold, which I believe has been changed through time.

 

IMG_1497_zpsfcb1ca49.jpgIMG_1396_zpsbfe7078f.jpg

After opening the back I saw the IWC marked engraved.

 

IMG_1869_zps4aabe189.jpgIMG_1878_zpsd6dde71d.jpg

But the movement itself was not marked IWC. I looked everywhere, under the dial and the plates etc. No mark, only a production number. I thought the movement was so nicely made that I would believe that the work was also from IWC. So began the effort to find out what kind of movement this was. I looked through BidFun-db Archive: Watch Movements, which has the largest database on watch movements I know. But no no discoveries there. I looked through some other databases with pocket watches, but no findings. It was the stem that was broken. Believe it or not my local dealer with watch parts had a spare.

 

Cal71and72_zps95a64044.jpg

So after a day's exploration on the web, I searched on google on "old IWC pocket watch" and pressed the images. After I scrolled down pretty far, came this picture here forward. It resembled the movement and the kind of caliber it is.

 

IMG_1872_zps3ef2bc2d.jpg

After I googled a bit more on the actual caliber, I found not so much. But IWC produced only 600 copies of this movement between 1904 to -1917. Why so few I do not know. http://www.iwc.com/forum/en/discussion/7905/

 

 

In these times there are probably not many left of this type. So it was fun to get a little old IWC history on my watchmaker bench. This pocket watch was dated made in 1904.

 

Morten:)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Geo Distinguished Member

Geo

Posted
Posted

I enjoyed your post Morten. If IWC only made 600 of them it is indeed a rare beast and probably worth a fair bit.

With all these fishy things in the movement, it should have been a marine chronometer! :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MortenS Watch Enthusiast

MortenS

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi Morten,

 

Welcome to the forum. Excellent report! I enjoyed it very much. I hope you'll find this forum an invaluable resource with its friendly and knowledgeable people.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Thank you Bob. I'm glad I found this place!:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Michael1962
      404 Club

      By Michael1962 · Posted

      Another question if I may. When you guys buy watch lots are you buying a mix of mechanical and quartz as well? Most of the job lots I am finding (all overseas) are a mix. If they are all mechanical, it is generally just movements with no cases. I am not at the point where I can identify movements by just viewing them so I'm not inclined to buy a bunch of stuff which will just end up lying around. Is anyone able to successfully move any of the watches they save on to someone else? I can't see a viable market in Australia for refurbished watches. Most people I have seen at work only have a watch if it counts their steps, answers their phone and makes the coffee. I'll admit it, I have a super cheap smartwatch on my wrist. Will I buy another one when it quits? Doubt it. I don't know if I would even bother with a pedometer. Heart rate? And do what with all the data? Blood pressure? Never been right since I got the watch. Sleep? If I can't work out that I'm not getting enough, I need to have a serious talk with myself. I think I'll go back to my Seiko and just make myself stay active.
    • Matty
      Tag Heuer Formula 1 3d printed bumpers

      By Matty · Posted

      I’m in for a set to please
    • JeremyLaurenson
      Good exploded movement posters...

      By JeremyLaurenson · Posted

      I suppose this fits "best" in this forum 😃 Im looking for some wall 'art' that doubles as a reference. Specifically Id like to find an ETA 28xx or Sellita exploded movement view. 2824/2836 would be ideal. Have any of you seen/found such a thing - there seem to be a lot of these for specialized movements, and none of them ready to print or to be had as a poster. Why help is appreciated.
    • praezis
      Deciphering mainspring specifications…

      By praezis · Posted

      The diameter is that of the ring - afaik, will have to look it up. “Wiggle room“ doesn‘t matter as long as the spring length is in the ball park.  Essential sizes of a mainspring are thickness, width and length. Diameter is just a hint if you can push into the barrel directly or will need a winder, it is no property of the spring. Frank
    • Knebo
      Deciphering mainspring specifications…

      By Knebo · Posted

      Hi @Zendoc, I guess you're like me and you don't have a mainspring winder.  I searched GR mainspring for the AS 1686 mainspring and I now understand your dilemma. The exact one is discontinued. To answer you question more directly, I see two good alternatives for you: a) GR4485 with 1.60 x .10 x 280 x 8.5 ( I guess this one is the one you found): https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/GR4485 OR b) GR4477 with 1.60 x .095 x 320 x 9. https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/gr4477   As you know, the the AS 1686 spring is supposed to be 1.60 x .10 x 300 x 9. - both of the above will fit and you'll manage to insert them from the retention ring without need for a mainspring winder (provided you know how to do it). - GR4485 will give you more power (=higher amplitude), but less power reserve (due to shorter length) than the original. - GR4477 will give you the same power reserve as the original. However, a bit less power.   Personally, I'd take GR4477 for two reasons: 1. Well, the power reserve is better. 2. With modern lubricants and modern mainspring metal alloys, you tend to get a higher amplitude anyways. You'd maybe even end up with too much amplitude (knocking) if you go with the original size and use thin synthetic oils-- see discussion here: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/10580-omega-calt17-help/#comment-248101      
×
×
  • Create New...