Jump to content

Glass, gasket, case dilemma. Need help!


Chopin

Recommended Posts

Alright so I'm having some problems figuring this out. The watch below came with all parts original, as far as I can tell. It needed a new gasket and since the glass was hard to find I polished it a bit and after servicing the movement assembled everything in place.

Unfortunately, when I pull the crown out, the movement inside moves a bit sideways (same when I push it in) and there seems to be a small (but visible) gap between the chapter ring and the case, hence, making the dial visible (it's worse when you add the glass because of the magnifying effect).

From looking online the glass seems the original one but I can't tell for sure. I am starting to wonder whether the watch had an acrylic crystal with a tension ring, originally, and maybe a gasket as well.

Do you think that if I installed a gasket and then an acrylic crystal with a tension ring, the tension ring would cover the gap but also stop the dial/movement from moving ? The movement itself has the original plastic spacer and also 2 metalic strips to hold it in place which are also original.

I've seen some online photos but I just can't figure out whether those have original glass/crystals or whether they have tension rings or not. Please help!

20191216_232432.thumb.jpg.c7884fb04dce2ce3186f6958ab60e1d3.jpg

asd.jpg.5b877458e9b2d82450552ae7a31ca339.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me understand. the movement didnt wiggle before you removed the crystal correct? if so when you took it apart did you see a gasket or a tension ring? It does look like the stype that would use a tension ring but Either way a tensing ring is not going to help with the movement wiggling nor would a gasket. it looks as if you didnt install the movement correctly or the movement spacer is seated right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the T-12 in these cushion cases have a multi sided screw-in bezel. Does yours have internal threads in the case?

It is possible to install the movement ring upside down, thereby upsetting the relationship of the dial, movement and case, there may be some witness marks left by the screws previously so its worth checking.

Also you could have a wrong or worn out movement ring. These Tissot usually have white a plastic one and sometimes the area where the case screws sit are worn. I have had to repair them by building them up with super glue and dressing them down with a file.

In these designs, the movement is fixed to the ring and the ring is what determines the relationship of the dial vs movement.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@saswatch88 It did this before, as well.

@anilv This model does not have any kind of bezel. The spacer was installed correctly and it is not damaged. With the movement and spacer installed, I can actually use a tweezer and just slightly move the whole ensemble around (talking 0,1mm or so...). Takes a bit of force, though.

Not only does it slightly move when pushing/pulling the crown but also the gap between the case and chapter ring makes the dial visible just a tad and it looks out of place. I highly doubt that that is how these watches were made.

What I have noticed is that the crown has a gasket inside but it's not rubber but actually plastic (it seems to seal in the case pretty well but not sure how water resistant it is) and it sits very tight when inside the case tube. For example when I'm manually winding the watch (or turning the crown the other way to produce that well-known clicking sound) I can feel the crown very tight actually because of that plastic gasket that probably rubs against the tube.

I'm wondering whether the tightness caused by the gasket might influence this but at the same time it is the original one (I guess). I doubt that they would have made such a watch with a poorly designed gasket. The case is a compressor btw.

Edited by Chopin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The crown gasket should not affect the location of the movement in the case if the parts are orientated correctly.

Here's a picture of mine. The dial looks similar. It has a big 16-sided screw-down bezel on the front which keeps the crystal down. It looks like it should have an inner bezel, I made a half-hearted attempt to remove it but it didn't budge so I just polished the crystal in-situ.

Will look for it and have a closer look.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jet @anilv thanks for the link. Mine is slightly different. There is no thread inside the case and the glass sits firmly as it should thanks to the gasket. I see yours has/had a gasket as well.

There are some photos of my model on the web and it looks similar, no bezel. I just can't seem to see whether there's something inside holding the dial/chapter ring (it seems like there isn't).  Even the glass is identical.

Here it is.

https://www.catawiki.com/l/29115339-tissot-t12-automatic-women-1971

Still wondering whether it might have had a tension ringed crystal but even with the gasket in place I don't know if it would be the desired fit.

Weirdly I see the one in the auction also has a very small but visible gap between the ring and the glass/case.

Edited by Chopin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like I'll be wearing the dunce hat.

Problem solved and it was a no-brainer but somehow it only hit me now. The case clamps were flat and as you know they (usually) need to be slightly at an angle to actually hold the movement against the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We need to identify the movement to help you, but the oldest of these Rolco watches use Aegler-Rebberg movements that lack a calibre number and are very difficult to identify. You may end up having to make or modify a stem to fit . Post pictures of both sides of the movement when you have it and the size of the movement and hopefully it’s one that has a calibre number.  Gruen used a lot of the same Aegler movements at the time and it’s worth comparing your movement with those if you can’t find it labeled as an Aegler or Rolex/Rolco calibre. Best Regards, Mark  
    • Onlly a pro's eye would notice that OH, you've still got it old fella 🙂
    • The triple lobed spring, as you suggest needs to be rotated to remove it or replace it. Suitably shaped pegwood should suffice, but tools (shaped as you describe) for the purpose also exist.  If you have an assorted of replacement springs, a trilobe style KIF spring of the right size might fit.  The other spring securing the jewel also needs rotating. There is a slight opening in the setting at about the 5 o’clock position in your photo and one side of the spring should be able to be removed  there when rotated into position.  Hope that helps, Mark
    • As an update, it transpired the setting on the balance side, with the jewel had one flat end and one curved. When I rotated it enough it popped out. The chaton was entirely conical and a tricky customer but once lubricated and dropped back in I put the flat edge in first and poked it in with the peg wood tool mentioned above (I made it with flattening off the end then sizing with a pencil sharpener before poking a hole in the end) then rotated and it went in well.    For the other side, magnet searching for the spring has been fruitless.    thanks for the link to the other thread
    • Thank you. It didn’t look rusty. For sure old.    Female part was inside the movement, and when I pushed male part, it got broken. I didn’t apply grease. Here is the photo.      Could it be that male part is too thick for some reason?
×
×
  • Create New...