Jump to content

Solutions for changing vintage watch glass


Chopin

Recommended Posts

Hello guys, I have to change the glass and gasket of a swiss ladies vintage watch but I'm a bit stuck as I've never encountered this type before. I did some light searching on Cousins but since I'm not sure what to look for I decided to post here before ordering anything. I'm posting pics and a wannabe schematic below for help.

I guess it's not mandatory to go for glass and I could opt for acrylic as well but I'm not sure if I can find the right type and dimensions.

With my limited knowledge I stopped at this particular type (link) but sadly they don't have the smaller diameter that I need. There is also one that is flat bottomed but I wonder if the dial and hands will be correctly visible with that kind of glass. From what I've seen the original one has magnifying properties (probably because it's not flat bottomed). Would there be a similar type of crystal on the acrylic side ?

20191129-151310.jpg

20191129-151338.jpg

The gasket seems to be "S" shaped but I assume that the "L" shaped ones will be fine as well.

asd.jpg

Side view of the original glass in the case.

IMG-8277a.jpg

Ideally I'd like to buy from Cousins as I already have an account with them and prices are good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not cracked and I don't think that it's scratched either but it is a bit opaque for some reason. Never "polished" a glass crystal so I guess that will be the last thing on my list... It would be cheaper, though.

One other problem is the gasket. I have a feeling that the old one is a bit thicker than the modern ones...

What is the thickness of modern "L" gaskets ? If it's 1mm or so then it's good.. The ones on cousins seem to be -0,4 or 0,5mm...

Edited by Chopin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will check the document out... The one that I need has to have a straight vertical wall and it needs to be 2mm thick though...

I wonder if this one would work... But it too seems to have a rounded edge...

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/200mm-domed-cousins

For this type of glass, when they say 2mm thick do they mean total height or just thickness of the glass?

Edited by Chopin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible to skip the sandpaper/wetpaper stage ? What other alternatives are there to ceriumoxid ?

Also, with wetpaper, given that the glass is only matted/opaque a bit (I'm guessing due to years of wear) could I just use the highest grit possible and then switch to rubbing it with something ?

And what sandpaper grit would be good enough ? 200-300 ?

Edited by Chopin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many topics written about this, but the same questions are always asked. In short:

Only wet paper removes scratches. Depending on various factors, there is no set grade. 400 or 600 are the rough ones to start. 

Wet paper is not an effective way to finish work after, say an 800 or 1000 grit pass. Use diamond paste on an hard wheel instead. 

Cerium oxide is not indispensabile. You may find that if fact it does nothing than fine diamond paste does not do but seems harder to clean. 

Edited by jdm
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jdm said:

So many topics written about this, but the same question are always asked. In short:

Only wet paper removes scratches. Depending on various factors, there is no set grade. 400 or 600 are the rough ones to start

Wet paper is not an effective way to finish work after, say an 800 or 1000 grit pass. Use diamond paste on an hard wheel instead. 

Cerium oxide is not indispensabile. You may find that if fact it does nothing than fine diamond paste does not do. 

I use diamond paste to.  I polished this with 400 paper then 800 and last 1200 wet . And last diamond paste . As i didn't have any ceriumoxide. Result is pretty okay? DSC00587.thumb.JPG.6a93f12abf99129a63e90c6ba68e74f5.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had some diamond paste around and decided to use it. Result is good overall.

The glass had no visible scratches with the naked eye but it was a bit opaque. The paste did the job. (Not perfect but almost)

Have ordered some gaskets and I hope that the glass will be a tight fit.

Will remember your advices for future projects. Thanks!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Chopin said:

The glass had no visible scratches with the naked eye but it was a bit opaque. The paste did the job. (Not perfect but almost)

Have you used a rotary tool? Without it you would spend a lot of time for little progress. And the tool must be kept steady by some sort of holder.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks good. As one makes progress in polishing it becomes important not only to obtain the best possible result, but to get there quickly and with the minimum effort and mess.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, rogart63 said:

Great result Chopin  If you look att the zenith it's not perfect either.  I could have used a finer wet and dry paper before i polished it. A 2000 or maybe even 3000 paper would be perfect. 

 

I think it looks good. Love the watch, too. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
×
×
  • Create New...