Jump to content

Seiko 4006-7012 27 Jewel Bellmatic Hands Dragging


Recommended Posts

I have a Seiko 4006-7012 27J that I've had in the back of my box for a while. When running and setting the hands drag and the hour hand will stop moving. It happens worse when approaching day/date change. I have never worked on this watch movement before. Is there anything I should look for as I approach a clean and repair? Overall, the watch is in good shape with little wear, but the hand movement is in need of repair. BTW, I have not timed the movement to see how it is running.

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If hands feel loose when setting and stop before date change then look at the cannon pinion. It need a very delicate squeeze. Others will chime in with links and how to do this correctly I'm sure. Good luck.

Edited by Melt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Melt said:

If hands feel loose when setting and stop before date change then look at the cannon pinion. It need a very delicate squeeze. Others will chime in with links and how to do this correctly I'm sure. Good luck.

The minute hand and second hand are working properly, so it's probably in the cannon area. I normally do not attempt working on movements of the caliber(complexity) but I've had this one in the back of the box for a while waiting for a time I could get brave enough to give it a go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The alarm complication itself is straightforward,  alarm set and date day mechs crowd up on top of the train do often misfunction. Close ups of the underdial during  disassembly can make life easier. 

Dial feet easily brake which dosn,t help the functioning of mechs under the dial.

As long as dial feet, day and date rings don,t sustain damage/ bent, you will have no surprise. 

Good luck 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...