Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I was able to detach the balance and hairspring from the balance cock with everyone's help :biggrin:!  I'm not sure I had to do this to correct the problem, but this is a learning journey for me.

post-38-0-91163000-1422505362_thumb.jpg

Now that I have removed it, I have a much better understanding of what could be causing the hairspring to lie at an angle as per my original picture (when it was still in the movement)...

post-38-0-54800500-1422505324_thumb.png

Correcting the problem: From what I can see and surmise, and I may be way off here, does the hairspring stud simply need to be installed deeper into the balance cock with a corresponding change in height where it passes through the regulator for the hairspring to lie flat?

Cheers!

Roger 

Posted (edited)

Hi Roger, looking at your pictures that may well be the case. If the hairspring is perfectly flat now that it is free of the cock, I would try re-installing it at a depth that allows it stop sit flat. Then check that the alignment is OK between the regulator pins throughout the range of adjustment. If it all checks out OK, refit to the movement and see how it runs. :)

A wee tip:- Get a block of cork and pin the cock to it, it makes working on it a lot easier.

Edited by Geo
Posted (edited)

It,s hard to tell via the pics & it might be a trick of the light but it looks like the balance staff is not seated in both jewels.

The other thought is, is it the original hairspring. The reason I say this is I had this issue & it was the centre hairspring stud was longer than the original so alignment was difficult. If I remember correctly I put a small upwards twist in the hairspring at the end stud to get alignment. Someone with more experience might have a better ideas.

Edited by clockboy
Posted

Geo: I think I have nothing to lose by resetting the height of the stud to see if that solves the problem.

Clockboy: I am not sure if it's the original hairspring. I bought it used off EBay so I am not sure. I do have a donor movement and the watch is currently running with the balance assembly from the donor. I think I'll remove the donor balance and compare the two to see if what you are suggesting is a possibility.

Thanks gents!

Roger

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi Watchrepairtalk, I have some questions about part sourcing I was hoping someone here might be able to help with. I'm working on an FHF 180 movement with a broken balance staff, broken regulator pins, and damaged cap jewels (both top and bottom). Some Googling says that this is similar to other FHF calibers like 150s, 160s, 180s and so on but I can't figure out what the functional difference is between these movements.  Is there any reason I wouldn't be able to acquire a donor FHF 150 or similar (with no shock protection) and use parts from that or would it be smarter to source replacements individually? Also are there any sources someone could recommend to get bulk cap jewels like this? Thank you for the help!
    • Hello and welcome to the WRT forum.
    • interesting video nice to see the machine what it can do now I wonder what it costs and I'm sure it's not in my budget. Plus the video brought up questions but the website below answers the questions? What was bothering me was the size of his machine 4 mm because I thought it was bigger than that? But then it occurred to me that maybe they had variations it looks like four, seven and 10. With the seven and 10 being the best because way more tool positions in way more rotating tools. Although I bet you all the rotating tools are probably separate cost https://www.tornos.com/en/content/swissnano   Then as we been talking about Sherline. Just so that everyone's aware of this they have another division their industrial division where you can buy bits and pieces. I have a link below that shows that just in case you don't want to have the entire machine you just need bits and pieces. https://www.sherline.com/product-category/industrial-products-division/   Let's see what we can do with the concept I explained up above and bits and pieces. For one thing you can make a really tiny gear very tiny like perhaps you're going to make a watch. Then another version the center part is not separate it is all machined from one piece. Then fills gear cutting machines have gone through multiple of evolutions. A lot of it based on what he wanted to make like he was going to make a watch unfortunately eyesight issues have prevented that. Another reason why you should start projects like this much sooner when your eyesight is really good or perhaps start on watches first and then move the clocks then local we have from the industrial division? Looks like two separate motors and heads. Then it's hard to see but this entire thing is built on top of a much larger milling machine as a larger milling machine gave a very solid platform to build everything.   Then like everything else that had multiple generations are versions the indexing went through of course variations like above is one version and the one below was the last version. Now the version below I mentioned that previously and somewhere in the beginning to discussion and somebody else had one in their picture. As it is a really nice precision indexing. Then I wasn't sure if I had a the watch photos here is his unfinished watch. No he wasn't going to make a simple watch like none of his clocks were simply either what would be the challenge and that.    
    • Use a Portwest Howie lab coat. They are the biological type so they have tapped cuffs so you don't end up getting the loose cuffs of normal lab coats catching everything. 
    • Some of the Chinese tools ae great and can be purchased at a fraction of the price of Swiss ones, some are complete garbage and some I'm convinced are coming out the same factory as the branded ones.
×
×
  • Create New...