Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone.

Looking for some advice.

I recently got a timegrapher and tested my 8 month old Submariner. It seems to be running -2 secs a day and the Beat error is between 0.4-0.6.

I went to my local AD who tested and confirmed my findings and said I should send back go RSC asap.

I am not sure what to do. Do I really want my brand new watch opened up..

What advice would you give ?

Is it within spec? 

 

Thanks

 

 

Posted (edited)

@Scottrb1: Welcome to the forum ;)

I'm a bit confused about your question? Your Rolex 3135 seems to be running -2 seconds a day ......?

Seems to be running, or does it run -2 sec a day on your wrist? And in which position does it run -2 s/d? What about all the other positions? The same counts for the beat-error.

A beat error of 0.4 - 0.6ms is, according to the information I have, within specs, so is the daily rate when taken over all the different positions

Then the question whether you want your watch to be opened? It depends on who does it.... If it is an official Rolex service center, and they deem it necessary to make adjustments, then they will replace the O-ring and test the watch for the required water-tightness. Make sure however, it's an official Rolex service center. I have bad experiences with Rolex dealers with their own watch-repairers.

Then the next question; what accuracy are you after? Quartz precision?  -2 s/d on your wrist seems for a mechanical watch reasonable/pretty good and if the watch runs -2 s/d constantly, then don't worry too much about the small beat-error ..... it doesn't hurt the watch.

So, yes, many questions open .....

743170996_Rolex3135criteria1.thumb.jpg.a72be383b76ba7a87d21413b31d1627f.jpg

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I noticed one error / assumption in my reply; that your Submariner has the 3135 movement !? I'm not sure which movement is in these days Submariners. Perhaps your movement has some tighter tolerances, but still ..... if your watch runs constantly -2 s/d on the wrist and the beat-error is between 0.4-0.6ms, it can't be that far off ....

The reference sheet I've given you is for a 3135.

Try to find out which movement it has and what the Rolex specs for that movement are.

Edited by Endeavor
Posted

Rolex specifications are interesting and there seems to be some minor variations? So I'm looking at a Rolex specification sheet for the 3135 first criteria 15 then the second criteria is -1 to +5. then the specifications are averages of positions or averages over time.

Then there's the other minor little thing which timing machine did you use? the reason for the question is if your timing machine only reads to seconds you usually have an error of plus and minus whatever the smallest digit is. So if you want to actually know the second you need a machine that measures to the 10th of a second. Then whatever it's time standard is should be of suitable accuracy to maintain that resolution of accuracy.

then as wonderful as timing machines are there really not the final test of what the watch does for timekeeping. The final test is to set the watch to a decent time standard. In other words the time standard has to have time better than the Rolex. Then watch the watch over several days and see what it does. then ideally it should be on your wrist not sitting in one position.

Posted

Thank you very much guys. Much appreciated.

I am just away atm with the wife glancing on my phone when she's not looking, so I will reply to you guys on Monday with all answers to your questions when I am back on the laptop.

Have great weekend guys

 

Posted (edited)

Probably nothing to do with your Rolex, but I thought it is a funny story;

Back in the early '70's an uncle of mine (successful in business) bought a seaworthy motorboat. It wasn't a new one, but still very nice; radar, sonar, radio-equipment and all the rest of it. It had two huge inboard Volvo petrol engines capable of propelling the boat up to an awesome speed of 60 km/h. It had always been sealing fine and it was still sealing great.

My uncle thought, since we were dealing with petrol, to install some sensors, or sniffers if you like, underneath the hatches of the motor compartment to detect any gasses or petrol leaks. On the control-panel were flash-lights, whistles & horns.

Anyway, we went on a weekend tour with him and every hour or so, all the alarms went off. Halve in panic the engines were shut down and the hatches pulled off for venting and investigations.

What a nightmare that boat became .....

 

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 9/28/2018 at 8:46 PM, Scottrb1 said:

I am just away atm with the wife glancing on my phone when she's not looking, so I will reply to you guys on Monday with all answers to your questions when I am back on the laptop. 

Expand  

We are still hanging on the cliff; awaiting ......

@Scottrb1: Have you been caught red handed glancing on your phone ? :mad:

Edited by Endeavor
Posted

Hi Scottrb1, your Rolex looks fine to me and in spec.  I would not touch it. If you want +3 secs per month then get a Fake Rolex Quartz like mine. Regards, Mike.

Posted

About this:  

"Balance is just an instant of perfection, stability is more: it is the permanent probability that the balance is not far away"

Harm van Veen. The Tao of Kiteflying

  • Like 1


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorry @nickelsilver, I'm just seeing this now.  It is a standard metric screw plate. I followed the suggestion of doing the thread cutting in a pin vise.  It took me forever because the piece is so delicate that I cut and cleared chips very frequently.  But eventually I did get it.  Not pretty, but I got it; the first thing I ever successfully made on the lathe. I cut the screw slot with a jewelers saw.  How can I ensure that the slot is centered on the screw head?
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hello, My name is David and I’m a vintage watch collector/ wanna be hobbyist watchmaker from France. I really want to progress into my watch repairing hobby. For now, I’m only having fun servicing my own watches and spare movements, simple small 3 hands from the 50s (Omega, eterna…) Learning step by step or at least trying to 🙂
    • More setbacks and successes...  After letting the watch run in (but before I fixed the BE) a chunk of the radium lume fell off one of the hands and pulverized leaving radioactive dust all over the dial 😞 ☢️ ☠️ So before I could continue further I decided I would remove the radium lume.  I have removed radium lume from hands before where it was already starting to flake away but this time I had to work out what I was going to do with debris on the dial.  I decided that getting everything under water and removing all the lume was probably the best way to go. So here is what I did... I put an essence jar I use for cleaning parts and filled it with water and put it into a big ziplock bag along with the tools I would need - a sharpened piece of pegwood and  a 0.80mm screwdriver  -  I put on a pair of nitrile gloves and a covid style mask and then opened the back of the watch. Now with the back off the watch I could do the rest inside the bag.  I removed the watch from the case and removed the hands from the dial (through the bag) and then undid the dial screws and removed the dial from the movement.  I then put the hands and the dial and the watch case into the water and removed the movement from the bag.  Carefully and slowly with one hand in the bag and one hand trying to poke and hold stuff through the bag I gently rubbed away the lume from the dial and hands with the pegwood. I then took the parts out of the water and removed the jar from the bag (leaving the parts still in the bag) - with the majority of the dangerous stuff now in the water I disposed of this (down the toilet) and gave the jar a good rinse in running water before refilling it and returning it to the bag where I gave all the parts another rinse in the new water.  I then took the parts and put the geiger counter over the top of them and looked at them carefully under UV light to see if there were any flakes still hanging on. I dried everything with some kitchen towel. Once I was finished will all that I remved the parts from then removed the gloves and put them in the bag with the paper towels and the pegwood and thew the bag in the household waste. Finally I gave the dial, hands and case another rinse in the sink under running water.  I didn't bother following up with a rinse in distilled water water because the water here is pretty clear of limescale etc and I find it doesn't mark! So here are the results of my weekends work! Timegrapher dial down (dial up is almost the same) The fixed shock setting New crystal - and lume removed from dial and hands
    • Hi and welcome! I'm new here too—greetings from Leicester, UK.
×
×
  • Create New...