Jump to content

Seiko 4207 rubbing barrel


Recommended Posts

I was recently given a Ladies Seiko 4207 automatic watch to service.

This will be the first time I've serviced a ladies automatic watch.

The watch was given to me not running but no information as to why it had stopped running.

On removing the back cover it became obvious there was a problem.

Look at the photo below, see the dark circle on the barrel with the red arrow pointing at it.

4207_1.png.6434fd9699f0bb240d7b6f53c5137999.png

That is an actual wear mark into the cover on the barrel, so obviously something is rubbing on it. I couldn't see anything obvious as to what was rubbing so I started to strip it down.

On removing the day wheel I was surprised to see cross head screws holding on the day jumper, and went and grabbed my new Horotec crosshead screw drivers I had just recently purchased. Imagine my surprise when I discovered the smallest one at 1.2mm was too big.

After some digging on Cousins I have found the AF make a 'Seiko' cross head screwdriver for the 9S26 which is 0.98mm, so I've added that to my next order. Hopefully it is small enough.

Sorry about the quality of photos but my camera recently broke and will no longer focus. I now need to move my camera closer or further away from what I am photographing to get it to focus.

Doesn't matter how many tools you have, you always need another one.............

4207_2.png.7b0e59a1ae287861cc833499a6758f81.png

Edited by Tmuir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those screws are present on many Seiko movements. I just screw/unscrew mine with the smallest flat screwdriver that I have which is 0,8 or so. It's still a bit big but if you improvise a bit you can do it.

Is that circle mark really a worn out part or just dried out gunk/debris/lubricant ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...