Jump to content

To Restore - Or Not To Restore - That Is The Question...

WillFly
 Share

Recommended Posts

WillFly Distinguished Member

WillFly

Posted
Posted (edited)

A recent question from Geo on whether I would get the dial refurbished on  a recently-bought Longines prompted some musing on my part about the vexed question of restoration - particularly of dials. It's a question I've never resolved in my own mind, so have usually tended to let things lie.

 

Coincidentally, I asked the D.R. Bill dial restoration people to give me a quote on a Luxor chrono dial which is tatty and has been "nibbled on part of the edge (I've included a pic below). He gave me a reasonable quote and said that he could do it "as long as I have the sizes in stock" - which implies that, rather than working to restore the original dial, there'll be a lookalike replacement. Roberto Facchini in Norwich gave a me a similar quote, but I got the impression that it was more of a restoration job. Difficult...

 

My problem is that, for me, a watch is a piece of history, and a 50-year old watch has 50 years of being used, lived with, etc. And I worry that, having had work done, I'll always regret the lack of the original. If a dial was really, really in a mess - which means that I would probably have bought the watch for the movement - then the decision would be easier!

 

post-64-0-12371100-1411208688_thumb.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CKelly WRT Addict

CKelly

Posted
Posted

Hi,

   Just to throw my two cents in here I think of a vintage watch much like a vintage car. They might be original with the paint all faded and having a rust hole or two in the fenders but look how much better they look after a good restoration. Of course the restoration will also prevent further damage. A friend once had a MG A I think it was. In the passenger seat you could look through the floor and see the asphalt going by. To get out you had to share the one door handle. It was much safer after restoration and looked a lot better as well. It's ok to restore paintings to the point of replacing holes in canvas.

   On watches we replace the crystal, polish the cases and change the bands without batting an eye. For me I want the dial looking nice as well. This is just my opinion and I wouldn't try to influence anyone to change their mind. Now the way I did the dial on my Omega is I bought another movement with a very bad dial that was like mine. Send that dial off to be refinished and kept the original dial on the watch until I got the refinished one back.  

Charles

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PadraicB WRT Addict

PadraicB

Posted
Posted (edited)

Personally, given a choice between a restored Luxor dial and the one pictured, I'd pay a lot more for the one pictured. It really depends on the end goal, does it not? Some people like seeing a watch's age, others want it to look almost brand new. If I had to, I might try to get the "nibbling" at the 5 o'clock mark repaired as much as possible but hi-res pictures usually amplify how aging detracts from appearance so it's hard for me to judge.

Of course, there's also times when "patina" is just "dirt" ;). So a cleanup, as opposed to a full restoration, is often acceptable if the dial CAN be cleaned and it's obviously far gone. And there's those times when restoration does actually preserve the rest of the watch and should precedence, like old crystals whose emissions in time can rust the movement and/or dial.

I can see why the choice is hard though, I love that dial design and if there no nibbling, I wouldn't even consider touching it.

Here's an example of another reason why I'd hesitate getting a dial restored. At the very end is a comparison between the original dial and a restoration. The two have substantial differences. To me, this would count as a terrible dial restoration...

Edited by PadraicB
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • VWatchie
      AS 554 from 1930

      By VWatchie · Posted

      I've also heard it called the "top side" and the dial side the "bottom side", which should make any non-repairer very confused. There are many examples and sometimes it comes down to personal preference. Personally, I like to say "dial train" whereas most other people would use the term "motion works".
    • mikepilk
      Chinese clone demagnetizers

      By mikepilk · Posted

      Is magnetism such a major problem that we (as home hobbyists) need to spend $$$ on a fancy demagnetiser? I use one of the cheap blue Chinese demagnetisers (£10 from ebay). It works, and has never failed to demagnetise a movement, or my screwdrivers. Magnetometer - who needs one?  Take a very small screw. If it sticks to the clean part, it is magnetised 🤣
    • Neverenoughwatches
      AS 554 from 1930

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      My overall preference is to use traditional names and terms, that became my habit when i was taught joinery by old boy chippies 2 generations older than me , that had their time in the 40's. But what i often do is adjust the names and terms i use according to who I'm talking with. Sometimes i will say trainside and occasionally watchmaker's side. I try to find a balance between accommodating other folk ( there's no point speaking a foreign language to someone who doesn't understand it ) and using a name that appears to me to be more relevant as to its use or description. But using the name lever can be quite confusing,  some watches might have parts that are also levers, release levers, which in effect is what the pallet fork is, an escapement release lever. 
    • mikepilk
      Seiko 6309a diver crown replacement

      By mikepilk · Posted

      Then put the case number in here https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/search-seiko-case-parts and it should give you the crown 
    • musicsnake
      Need Advice for Armoured Crystal

      By musicsnake · Posted

      I come across to replace the crystal of a 7734 chronograph.  What make it special there a printed chapter ring  which fits inside the recess of crystal before inserting into the case. I am thinking of a high dome crystal such as Sternkreuz ATCH, fitting diameter OD332/ID320.  For this purpose, tension ring will be removed and fit in the chapter ring.  I understand the crystal size may not perfectly fit these two dimension.  Should aim to find the right ID, then OD can be grinded to reduce without much difficulty.  To find the right crystal, the easiest way is to get know of the OD/ID relationship of Sternkreuz ATCH/ATCG (otherwise the OD of the crystal and tension ring).  I hope you are able to help to minimize the trial and errors.
×
×
  • Create New...