Jump to content

And Then I Spotted This One!


WillFly

Recommended Posts

Got back to the B&B and relaxed with eBay. Checked my Watch List and saw there were no bids on this - so I snapped it up. It's another typical 1930s/1940s watch with a nice, if slightly worn dial. Never heard of Ralco? It's Movado by another name. The Ralco name comes from the initials of three of the Ditesheim family (owners of Movado), Roger, Armand and Lucien.

 

post-64-0-66265500-1409926360_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I opened up the parcel containing the little Ralco yesterday and gave the crown a twist. Spun round like silk and started instantly. I had a little wrench getting the screw case cover off - it's one of those un-notched, octagonal cases with an  inner seal - but the Jaxa case tool did the job in the end. I doubt that's it's been opened since the 1930s or '40s! Anyway, it's as clean as a whistle and running to the second this morning. Not bad for £18... These little watches - and this one is just 28mm without crown - are very unfashionable these days, but I love them. The movement is lovely, and I'm going to do some research on the calibre, which may or may not be Movado. No restoration for this one - just a polish over the stainless steel case with a silver cloth.

 

post-64-0-69496300-1410420202_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-24070200-1410420212_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like an AS1187.

You may need to take the dial off to find the calibre mark and if I'm right then you should also see a quadrant of minute indices so that the movement could be timed and regulated (using just a minute hand and a microscope to check against a reference) without having to install the dial.

It's a very competent little movement that found it's way into watches from quite a number of different makers right the way across the quality spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Marc - it is indeed an AS 1187 - with a slightly different setting for the right-hand jewel on the bridge. By coincidence I was trawling through the Ranfft pages when I stopped to check the forum posts - must have skipped over this one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...