Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all

I have an interesting one here...

Working on an Omega Calibre 565, the watch is a front loader with monocoque case,  no case back, hence the split stem.

I extracted the split stem, with no issue as I have done many times before, serviced the movement, but now cannot fit the stem back in without pressing the little pusher / detent on on the upper side (which obviously is not accessible when the watch is cased!).

I have noticed the split stem which was in the watch does not have an angle/ bevel to help the setting lever slide over the shoulder into its groove. 

IMG_20171204_121639.jpg?dl=1

 

Other Split stems I have come across have a bevel, so it is easy to just slide the stem back in. Eg. below of another split stem, taken from an ETA 2750:

IMG_20171204_121751.jpg?dl=1

 

I thought I simply had the wrong part, but it begs the questions:

- how did the previous watchmaker who worked on this watch fit the stem?

- I have googled Omega split stems, and it seems some do not have the bevel, so I may well have the correct part?

 

Am I missing something? How can I put this back in?

 

I would welcome any advice!

 

Posted

Try a little grease on the beak of the stem where it snaps on. Sometimes dirt can get packed hard in the button preventing the button to fix flush against the case causing it to not make contact.  Try another stem if you have one in stock.

Posted

Surprised by this question, you do the inverse steps as for removing.

Fit the inner stem part with mov.t removed.
Fit mov.t in case.
Fit outer stem / crown.

Posted
Quote

 

"the two piece stem"   the part that goes into the movment  must be set first and tested ( winding and move the hands)  then put it in the case. vin

Posted
19 minutes ago, jdm said:

Surprised by this question, you do the inverse steps as for removing.

Fit the inner stem part with mov.t removed.
Fit mov.t in case.
Fit outer stem / crown.

Do you think he is trying to fit the whole stem and just attach the button part. If so my answer is very wrong.

Posted

Hi all thank you very much for your responses.

Clearly I was missing something here, very sorry if this sounded like a stupid question... It all makes sense now.

I was trying to insert the whole stem (male + female assembly + crown) with the movement in the case - it works when there is a "bevel" on the stem. I have never "clipped" the female part on the male part with the movement in the case before, I did not realise you could do that, a bit silly of me really.

Thank you!

  • Like 1
  • 6 years later...
Posted (edited)
On 12/5/2017 at 2:38 AM, jdm said:

Surprised by this question, you do the inverse steps as for removing.

Fit the inner stem part with mov.t removed.
Fit mov.t in case.
Fit outer stem / crown.

Bringing this old thread back to life, as I have similar problem. I did follow this advice, but while inserting a male stem (crown side) and just pushed it to the female part, and the fork (female side) of the stem has broken. What is the right way? Push the stem part so it widens the gap and fits in? Why it was then receiving side got broken? Old metal? It is a vintage watch from late 60s. 
 

or the outer part should be inserted somehow from the side (slipping to the gap), but I don’t have space there for this manipulation. The watch is Orient Fineness monocoque case.
 

thank you!  

Edited by Rustinbox
Posted

Is the old stem rusty, are you sure you have it all lined up. Some of these two piece stems can be fiddle that is why I mentioned about the grease. Could you post a photo of the offending stem.  

Posted
18 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Is the old stem rusty, are you sure you have it all lined up. Some of these two piece stems can be fiddle that is why I mentioned about the grease. Could you post a photo of the offending stem.  

Thank you. It didn’t look rusty. For sure old. 
 

Female part was inside the movement, and when I pushed male part, it got broken. I didn’t apply grease. Here is the photo. 
 

 

IMG_0702.jpeg

Could it be that male part is too thick for some reason?



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see. And is there a possibility to convert it to a springless system by replacing it with a standard split stem model?
    • Sharpening gauge.   I found the easiest side to do was the safety roller as the roller table laid flat on a block provided stability.  The other way requires a specific stump for the roller and pin to sit in, but may also grip better way.
    • Yes, the problem isn't so much with the 'background' radiation but inhaling or digesting loose flakes and dust that can become airborne.
    • The spring is so the crown pops out to the winding position when unscrewed.
    • Radium and the horrible story of the Radium Girls scares everyone - But there is also a lot of paranoia here.  I did a whole bunch of readings on a watch with Radium lume recently. My Geiger counter read 2µsv/h through the crystal with the sensor part of the Geiger counter right on top of the watch.  This measurement dropped off to the normal background rate of 0.18µsv/h as soon at the Geiger counter is just a few cms away. Measuring from the back of the watch and there is virtually no increase.  The rate went up to 5µsv/h from the dial and hands when the movement was removed from the case. To put this in perspective a Frankfurt to New York flight would give you about 50µsv of exposure and a chest x-ray about 100µsv.  Norwegian labour law states “The limit value for workers over the age of 18 years is set to 20 mSv per calendar year.” - that is the equivalent of 400 flights across the Atlantic! I will however point out at this point it is important that you don’t ingest the radium from the watch! One of the worst things you can do is scrape the radium off the dials and create radioactive dust that you could breath in! That being said… If for each radium lumed watch you work on you spend 15 minutes getting the movement out of the case and the dial and hands off and then another 15 minutes at the end putting the dial and hands back on your exposure would be less than 2.5µsv  Once you have the hands and dial off they can go in a box and put safely out of the way (probably good practice for any watch!). I believe the risks are negligible If you take precautions such as wearing a mask and gloves and wiping your work surfaces down with a damp paper towel and disposing of the towel, gloves and mask once you are finished  
×
×
  • Create New...