Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello eveyone,

I am attempting my first ever repair. Need your advice.

I have a Seiko SKX007J, with the 7s26B movement.The crown will only move out by one click. If you rotate the crown, the date changes and the hands move simultaneously. They continue to move until you screw the crown all the way down. 

I have taken the the back off (with my new jaxa and case holder, first time taking a watch back off, yippee! great fun, I love it!). The little lever, which normally moves out when you move the crown to the neutral position, to show the tiny circular indent, which you depress to remove the stem, does NOT move when you put the crown to the neutral position.

I discovered I could get it out by gently pushing the other end of the lever with a screw driver. I removed the stem this way, but when I put the stem back in, the lever would not come out again.

any and all advice anyone can give is greatly appreciated.

thank you, Mark

Posted (edited)

There must be something that doesn't sit right in the keyless work. There is usually no problem with the 7s26 movements when it comes to that .

Could have jumped off here at the black ring or the arm has slide over the clutch wheel (red ring)  Which could happen if you pull the stem to fast out. But you need to take the dial of to find out :( 

keyless6487.jpg

Edited by rogart63
  • Like 2
Posted

Sounds like you have the right of it, Rogart, only isn't all that keyless work accessed from the top side on these or am I missing something?

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Ishima said:

Sounds like you have the right of it, Rogart, only isn't all that keyless work accessed from the top side on these or am I missing something?

You will need to remove the movement from the case, remove the hands, dial and calendar work to be able to get to it. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

You will need to remove the movement from the case, remove the hands, dial and calendar work to be able to get to it. 

Actually on the 7S26 that's technically not completely true. Ishima is right, only the second hand need to be removed in order to access the keyless, and the entire calendar can be safely left in place :)

As Rogart has mentioned, it seems like the setting spring (black circle above) has dislodged. I recommend the OP to NOT try to repair this by himself without having first acquired all the correct tools, lubricants, and have practiced on other mov.t about which he doesn't care at all. Even if a Seiko movement is very cheap to replace, it would be a pity to further damage it.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 2
Posted

Think you are right there. I have mostly worked with 7S26A movement.  That is a real pain in the ... ? Almost easier to take the dial of the have to remove the trainwheel bridge . As @jdm says a new movement could be bought instead. Maybe that is the best option. 

Posted (edited)

Actually I recommend to repair, not replace this one, inspecting and testing the setting lever to check that's its pin, or the valleys on spring aren't damaged so to make it go off again.

However I'm perfectly aware that in the Western world, any watch repairer (assuming you can find a good one), will ask about the value of the watch itself for the work. For that I can' offer a solution except DIY after proper self-education.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, jdm said:

Actually on the 7S26 that's technically not completely true. Ishima is right, only the second hand need to be removed in order to access the keyless, and the entire calendar can be safely left in place :)

As Rogart has mentioned, it seems like the setting spring (black circle above) has dislodged. I recommend the OP to NOT try to repair this by himself without having first acquired all the correct tools, lubricants, and have practiced on other mov.t about which he doesn't care at all. Even if a Seiko movement is very cheap to replace, it would be a pity to further damage it.

I didn't know that. Its been a very long time since I was a watchmaker. I'm sorry if I have given the wrong advice.

Posted
12 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I didn't know that. Its been a very long time since I was a watchmaker. I'm sorry if I have given the wrong advice.

No problem, you're always welcome mate.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
×
×
  • Create New...