Jump to content

Buren movement designed for other functions?


DJW

Recommended Posts

I was tearing down this Buren movement and noticed that there is a pinion for a separate gear. It is driven off of the hour wheel. The hour wheel does has a separate gear set underneath that drives whatever would be in this position. Would this be some sort of a date function? Movent is engraved ST 171 ... I could not find any information on this with any relation to Buren watch movements.

IMG_20170620_190418017.jpg

IMG_20170620_195840687.jpg

IMG_20170620_192903154.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I wasn't clear enough about where it's located on the main plate dial side... It's the large circular recess with the pinion in the middle. Just off the hour wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After a little more research it appears that these movements were actually supplied by Seiko Corporation. I have found some very similar Seiko movements with the same dial side layout. And it does appear that there was some advancing wheel there for a date function that was not installed on this movement. I believe from the research I read that Seiko started a company called UT and supplied movements unmarked or E Bosh's to companies. I believe this is one of those movements. It also only Beats at 18000 BPH... Ones that are stamped Seiko all seem to beat at 21600 bph...

Makes sense now that the case was stamped Hong Kong. So now truly an international watch! a watch company that was based in Switzerland with a Japanese movement and a Hong Kong Chinese case:huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

After a little more research it appears that these movements were actually supplied by Seiko Corporation. I have found some very similar Seiko movements with the same dial side layout. And it does appear that there was some advancing wheel there for a date function that was not installed on this movement. I believe from the research I read that Seiko started a company called UT and supplied movements unmarked or E Bosh's to companies. I believe this is one of those movements. It also only Beats at 18000 BPH... Ones that are stamped Seiko all seem to beat at 21600 bph...

Makes sense now that the case was stamped Hong Kong. So now truly an international watch! a watch company that was based in Switzerland with a Japanese movement and a Hong Kong Chinese case:huh:

Thought i had seen it somewhere before. Its a Seiko 7625 or something like that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also you can see where the calendar advancement wheel is located in the same exact spot of the area in question that I had originally. Mystery solved! Thanks guys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think this is the closest match..

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&a&2uswk&Seiko_6105A

Also I wasn't sure if anyone other than Seiko had used this automatic winding movement, it has the magic lever type escapement shown in the pictures on this reference page at the bottom...

That ain't a 6105 movement. Not even a 7625 as i thought at first. That has no adjustable beaterror arm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...