Jump to content

Removing a Suspension Spring from a wheel F/S setting


Folkvisor

Recommended Posts

The suspension spring seems to be 'locked' into the wheel-type F/S adjustment assembly on the clock. Also, the screw holding the assembly is very tight so I don't want to mess with it until I get all the wheels off.

Is there a way of spreading the groove holding the top of the suspension spring? I think a movement opener would get in there but I don't want to break anything.

No wonder that guy didn't want to fix this thing. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh My have you got some work ahead of you.

The adjuster is easy, take off the Verge/Anchor, should slide right off.

Adjust the adjuster so it uncovers the one screw underneath the threaded rod.

Its off.

The adjuster can be cleaned assembled, just check for cracks in the spring.

I see the verge has grooves which need to be stoned and polished out.

And lots of bushings, oh boy, this is where the fun starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with "altar' you have a whole bunch of work there. Looking at your pics the bushings certainly look suspect. I would give every part a real good clean & then inspect. A interesting project for sure keep us informed of your progress.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you stone the pallets be very careful as this will alter the depth of the escapement and its action, it could even stop the clock or cause it to trip, (escape more than one tooth at a time) also be careful with the escape wheel and its teeth, check for any bure on the end of the teeth. You need to check the action first be for altering anything. If the action is good and this being your first attempt you could leave it alone. The steel used in these clocks on pallets is quite hard, not so on the rest of the steel work. The holes are meant to be a bit larger than the pivots in these movements as the wheels have what are called lantern pinons, they work better if a bit loose, clean the clock first then check the holes and pivots for wear.  Don't be to quick in stoning, study the escapement first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree in my early days of clock repair I honed the escape on a french clock & the B**gger would not run because I had altered the depth.  I had to find another donor movement that had a replacement.  

As a matter of interest I have always wondered if it is acceptable to move a worn/scored anchor escapement further along its shaft to the un used part. Your thoughts oldhippy.

591acfe576043_anchorescapment.png.b2bc2104237d066a35bfeb797183828d.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like seeing it. I know it is quite a common practice. The one in your picture shows to me what looks like solder holding the pallets in place. This is wrong and very unsightly. On high grade clock movements this should never be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recognizing the job at hand is important to decide if it is within your comfort level. 

In Dave's case, he's dealing with a robust American movement that is overpowered and parts have a wide window of error compared to a French movement where everything needs to be dead on accurate.

He is just starting out and beginning to see the details, I doubt he will stone the verge but the groove was on the landing zone, I could not see the impulse face. In any case, bringing items to his attention is a good thing. He'll decide what is within his ability and then move on. Most failures are not catastrophic, they can be redone until everything is ticking. I was told many times that if your not making mistakes, your not learning. Courage and curiosity will get us through it.

Al T.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, clockboy said:

I agree in my early days of clock repair I honed the escape on a french clock & the B**gger would not run because I had altered the depth.  I had to find another donor movement that had a replacement.  

As a matter of interest I have always wondered if it is acceptable to move a worn/scored anchor escapement further along its shaft to the un used part. Your thoughts oldhippy.

591acfe576043_anchorescapment.png.b2bc2104237d066a35bfeb797183828d.png

Moving the anchor/verge over is the lesser of two evils. If you didn't bush the anchor or escape wheel.

If you did bush, verge to esc whl spacing may have changed, making a eccentric bushing would fix that and you might still move the verge over if your not comfortable with stoning the grooves.

Your the pilot in command so your decision is whats important. Having lots of tricks in your bag is what's important.

Al T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The correct decision should always be made and changing the works or bodging up a repair is NOT the way to go. If you call this type of thing a trick I don't think Master craftsman in horology would be too pleased. I know I’m not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For my education if shifting the anchor is not the 'best practice' and stoning the pallets will alter the depth what is the 'best practice'?

Stone the pallet and then reface them with a bit of main spring soft soldered in place to give the original depth again?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tmuir said:

For my education if shifting the anchor is not the 'best practice' and stoning the pallets will alter the depth what is the 'best practice'?

Stone the pallet and then reface them with a bit of main spring soft soldered in place to give the original depth again?

. You got it that is the correct practice. If done correctly, you will hardly notice that the pallets have been re-shod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, thank you for all the encouragement. 

I have a question: What is 'stoning' besides being a form of capital punishment in the Near East.

It's going to be an interesting project - that's for sure.

Good to know I have a group of people to rely on for advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's totally covered. It's a mixture right now of distilled water, alcohol, ammonia and dish soap. It seems to be doing a good job because I can't see through the water any more.

I am planning on rinsing it, drying it and putting it in a wash of naphtha. 

Will this plan do a good cleaning job? I was given the recipe by a clock repair guy in Winnipeg. Probably can't trust anyone from Winnipeg. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...