Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There are a few lessons here that I wish to impart upon those who like to do this kind of stuff and have experienced all the pratfalls of watches and the diagnosis and repair of such. I picked up a two tone 16s 15 jewel Hampden pocket watch a few weeks ago, complete with decent hunter case. My expectations were not really high because usually these type of two tone, (gold wash) movements are getting harder to find, hence the price goes up. I own a few, but not in 16 size. Anyway, this one comes up for $50 + ship, I saved it to see if any bids were received. After a week, nothing, watch get's relisted @ $30 + ship, so I threw out a bid and didn't expect a win. Long story short, it's mine now. So I get this and immediately start evaluation, ( does it run, wind, hands move, etc) Much to my amazement, it runs, but poorly. So apart it comes and here is what I found: No hands, sub second has funny twist, which is why it ran bad.DSCF0491.thumb.JPG.d312b56340107c4dfa9ae3ca77931bf0.JPG

Next out of case and off with dial, balance, bridges removed. Of course it's filthy.

DSCF0498.thumb.JPG.3b440ba72b4c19ccdcd3b81e50cd7ade.JPG

After an bath and overall assessment of jewels, mainspring, pivots, roller jewel/balance cock assembly, it got a bath.

DSCF0500.thumb.JPG.bd1bfa53cc19ccf2e28c0b2dcf8179cb.JPG

 

back together with lube and love she's running but missing hands!

So I found another comparable movement, and it was also a two tone, but a little more common, after a few bids, it's mine at $14 + postage. Now the unknown, I know the hands will fit to complete the first watch which is really all I wanted/needed,

enter How not to ship watch, this is what I got today and of course I had to tear it down, ALL I WANTED WAS THE HANDS!!!

DSCF0507.thumb.JPG.a8971a60257cfc10babb65b8fc4f5d31.JPG

At first I was, well PO'ed, but I got over that... when I saw what I got.

DSCF0511.thumb.JPG.9ac1b7f36a89a2d4ebb71d5ed15db377.JPG

In all fairness, seller did describe what they were selling, but here's the rub.... until you get it apart, you'll never know what you have, kinda like Forrest Gump " box of chocolates" First the hands were bent from packing, okay I can straighten them, then jewels were cracked, okay I can replace, (only if donor is found), then mainspring was out of barrel, I can fix that too...but roller jewel MISSING and appears to have been superglued in ARRRRGGGHHH!

DSCF0519.thumb.JPG.80abaa39e9d325a5e36e880fa86b72e2.JPGDSCF0516.thumb.JPG.dfb9fbff5dc697ce4941b6ac27f20271.JPGDSCF0523.thumb.JPG.8239eff3475d299b2b08c10042732faa.JPG

See the T end  in opening, not where its suppose to be DSCF0525.thumb.JPG.fea0139dc861fe587cc534a0e40c4edb.JPG

cleaned up

DSCF0520.thumb.JPG.bbd910db36134eb64778b449990a96d7.JPG

jewel out

DSCF0522.thumb.JPG.64e9aad86d813aa994304946f97d5314.JPG

jewel in

DSCF0508.thumb.JPG.39478798716becfcc29d9a3bf9eca494.JPG

bent hands from shipping,

Now I don't expect to get to the roller jewel unless I find a suitable replacement, (swap wheel and spring), which in a manner of speaking makes it a minor franken.

The point to all of this is: Whilst I achieved my preliminary plan to find some hands to make one watch complete, I now know have an additional movement, (dial cleaned up nicely) and the requirement of more part searching and effort to make complete, which I can sell off as a partial and maybe get some $$ back. All told spent ~$60 usd and one watch is working, Is it worth it???????

  • Like 2
Posted

The joys of pocket watches Dave. Another common fault with pocket watches is broken balance staffs probably because most had no shock proof jewels. Getting replacement parts is really difficult. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, clockboy said:

The joys of pocket watches Dave. Another common fault with pocket watches is broken balance staffs probably because most had no shock proof jewels. Getting replacement parts is really difficult. 

Hampdens are not much if a part problem, I don't have a ton of spares in 16s, just have to spend more time searching....thx

Posted
On 3/27/2017 at 3:13 PM, WileyDave said:

The point to all of this is: Whilst I achieved my preliminary plan to find some hands to make one watch complete, I now know have an additional movement, (dial cleaned up nicely) and the requirement of more part searching and effort to make complete, which I can sell off as a partial and maybe get some $$ back. All told spent ~$60 usd and one watch is working, Is it worth it???????

Oh sure it's worth it. Isn't that what we do? Start with a watch that needs to be brought back to life, buy a parts watch to accomplish that, look at the parts watch and say "gee, that would make a very nice watch if it was complete", but another parts watch, and -

repeat ad infinitum.

 

  • Like 2
Posted

need to clarify, first pic movement in case was original, (left) I did clean, but the hands from donor look like this on original, I like the roman numeral dial too, so mission accomplished now hafta replace roller and see if I can this other one running

DSCF0510.thumb.JPG.bac394cc8af44918e452d5838424f7cf.JPG

With donor hands installed and running ~8hours, btw missing case bezel & crystal

search goes on!

DSCF0532.thumb.JPG.654eea79104226dfc8cd78a9b75cde89.JPG

Posted

hampdens are a problem for me.  i bought a few  (at that price) for the cases,  even got a coin silver hunting case  with that mvt. (had to pay a bit more for that one).   my guess is hampdens are one of a few cheaper replacement works  of the 1920's in the U.S..

Posted
22 hours ago, vinn3 said:

hampdens are a problem for me.  i bought a few  (at that price) for the cases,  even got a coin silver hunting case  with that mvt. (had to pay a bit more for that one).   my guess is hampdens are one of a few cheaper replacement works  of the 1920's in the U.S..

Problem with Hampdens, they didn't produce but 4M total movements, unlike other US mfgs, so parts are sometime a premium. They were not necessarily cheap, but competitive with Walthams, etc. The value in Hampdens because they did not produce the numbers, is there are not many out there. Dueber made many more cases than movements, I've found Dueber cases on just about every other US movement. Thanks vinn3 for you comment!

Posted
22 hours ago, vinn3 said:

how was the quality of the dueber cases ?  they put the name too close to hamilton (sp).

I suppose they were as good as anyone else's, Dueber had some pretty fancy looking ones!

$_35.JPG

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...