Jump to content

Chrono hour counter problem on Omega


Recommended Posts

Hello Mark, hello folks,

My first time post here and I hope you can help with my small issue, I have an Omega day/date with 1151 movement. It is working perfectly in general, until I noticed something is out of order with the chrono hour counter, the subdial at 6 o'clock. If I stop and reset the chrono to zero, it looks fine, but that small  hour hand seems to keep on turning, although very very slowly, for example, in the picture here, you can see it moved  30 degrees in about 48 hours, now pointing to 1. I was wondering what might be the problem here and if this is a small fix that can be performed by a regular watchmaker, as I don't want to send it to Omega for their pricey "full service" which they always try to convince you is needed.

Thank you.

 

20170313_204532.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be as suggested a loose fitting hand. However it will need looking at by a qualified watch repairer. Chronographs are more complex than a normal watch so require a lot of time to strip inspect & repair. If it is the hand maybe a easy repair but I have my doubts.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a  look at this video. At time 2:20, Mark assembles the hour counting wheel mechanism. The way the hour counting works on this watch is that the wheel is attached directly to the mainspring barrel via a clutch mechanism. When you reset to zero, the hour hammer spins the wheel back to zero and the plastic lock engages the edge of the wheel, preventing it from turning - and activating the clutch. I suspect that plastic part is worn. All in, it's a simple repair, but it must be done by someone that knows what they are doing!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wls1971 said:

Apparently this is know as "hour hand creep", and is a know problem with the 7750 based Omega chronographs

This is a explenation from the chronomaddoxx site

http://chronomaddox.com/tzof_faq.html#Chrono_Hour_creep

Also a very plausible explanation. Once the hour hammer resets the wheel, the hammer spring (which Mark is shown fitting)  is what keeps the tension of the hour counter lock (plastic part) against the hour counter wheel. If this spring tension is off, it would have the result previously described. Too bad they use plastic for this part. I suspect they do so to minimize the wear on the counting wheel itself.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, SSTEEL said:

The hour brake is only plastic, and often wears, so replace this for new, and your good to go.

Ah, if only "I" could do it :)

Just to know for myself, in Mark's video assembling the calendar, is this the plastic stopper we're talking about ?

 

1151.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, I also learned that Omega has updated it in later versions of the movement, which they might install in case it's brought to them for service.

Anyway, it has been more than 36 hours since I last reset the chrono, and this time the hour hand has 'creeped' only very very little, perhaps half a millimeter, here is a pic of it, it might seem that it moved more than that, but the hand doesn't exactly reset right in the middle, but more like near the edge of the white dot, so apparently it  moves at its own whim :) :

 

 

20170315_220736.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...