Jump to content

Two from the 'bat.. part 2. Enicar Star Jewels


Recommended Posts

The second watch is from India.

Buying watches from Indian sellers is a gamble as there are some real horrors out there. You need to be a bit alert and watch out for frankenwatches made out of bits of other watches.

First up.. the ebay ad.

Enicar ebay 1.png

Enicar ebay 2.png

Typical of Indian sellers, a lot of information is posted..they are usually truthful and if the dial is refinished they will say so.

Enicar ebay 3.png

 

I was attracted to this watch because of it unusual shape, most from this period are round.. this is a bit tonneau shaped. The dial is also original with mile and even patina.

Indian sellers often sell watches with refinished dials. Look out for painted dial in garish colours, generic markings (waterproof, automatic). Large 'Swiss made' at the bottom of the dial. Also if the dial has a raised logo (like the 'Saturn' in this watch) you may find the dial has been painted and the logo polished to bring it up.. the paint will be thick around the logo. Also Indian dial refinishers do not do the minute indices on the dial well, sometimes they leave this out altogether.  Pay attention to the hands as well, they sometimes replace them with locally produced items which are basically stamped pieces of metal, the lengths of the hands also give a clue to their originality. Below 'seem' ok but  who knows?

Enicar Star jewels dial.jpg

P_20170114_160433.jpg

Something which was only apparent when the watch was in my hand was that someone had done a good job polishing the case, with radial brushing done so fine it could pass for original.

s-l1600.jpg

If I were to find a fault, I would say the transition from brushed top to polished sides was not as sharp as it would be from the factory.

P_20170114_160443.jpg

The polisher had popped the caseback on a lathe and left a rough grain, leaving the centre graphic polished. This was probably an attempt to disguise some caseback damage, these Enicars are difficult to open as they required a custom wrench.  Personally I think its too rough and I may try try to polish it in order to tone it down a bit.

P_20170114_160510.jpg

s-l500 (1).jpg

A pic of the inside of the caseback.

P_20170114_160530.jpg

and the crown

P_20170114_160450.jpg

 

 

Finally, heres a picture of the movement. This is definitely an original Enicar, an AR1140 as the seller indicated. Quite a nice movement, there are some markings on the ratchet wheel where I imagine sandpaper has been used to get rid of some rust, also it seems that one of the bridge screws is not original (the lower one on the barrel bridge) otherwise all seems ok.

 One thing to stay away from are watches which have no markings on the movement except for 17 jewels etc. If there's no manufacturers markings then its a 'bitsa'. Running a bit slow so it'll get a service soon.

There is some corrosion around the trough where the o-ring would go, this shows that the watch is really old and has seen some abuse in the past but the case polisher has done a decent job to get it back in good condition.

P_20170114_160548.jpg

s-l500.jpg

Apart from a service, I may try to source an Enicar crown as the one currently fitted is an unsigned generic one.

All in all a good buy for less tha USD40 all told.

 

cheers

Anilv

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...