Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello everybody,

My Breitling Chrono avenger suddenly start loosing ~10sec a day while once before it was ~+5sec a day. I've put him on the timing machine and I see that at face-up, it is running -10sec while at face down its -2sec. both measurements are quite consistent.

my question is does 8sec deviation between face up and face down consider as normal? (and there is also amplitude difference of ~14deg)...

thx, uzi.

20170107_184457.jpg

20170107_182736.jpg

Posted

Uzii,

Aside from the normal cleaning etc. check to see if the cone of the staff is binding on the jewel. Also check the ends of the pivots for the proper burnishing and geometry.

david

Posted

Before going to service (it was not mentioned  how long ago that was done, ifbecause the  ever) the mov.t I would consider just regulating it. That  because the pattern is regular as well the amplitude.

Posted

It might be worth just removing the balance clean with a de-greaser such as "one dip" then re-lube the cap jewels. If you don,t want to give it a full service that is. 

Posted

Hi friends,

Thank you for the advise. I bought this watch second hand so I don't really know when it was serviced. 

I'll first try to regulate and see the response. Cleaning and re-lubing the balance jewels requires dial removal right? so I wouldn't like to go there at the moment.

anyhow, can I conclude that such a difference is not considered as normal, right?

I'll check and update.

thank you all, uzi.

Posted
23 minutes ago, uzii said:

I'll first try to regulate and see the response. Cleaning and re-lubing the balance jewels requires dial removal right? so I wouldn't like to go there at the moment.

anyhow, can I conclude that such a difference is not considered as normal, right?

I recommend that in no case  you try to work on this valuable watch yourself. The positional variance is not ideal but not large either.

Posted
2 hours ago, uzii said:

Hi friends,

Thank you for the advise. I bought this watch second hand so I don't really know when it was serviced. 

I'll first try to regulate and see the response. Cleaning and re-lubing the balance jewels requires dial removal right? so I wouldn't like to go there at the moment.

anyhow, can I conclude that such a difference is not considered as normal, right?

I'll check and update.

thank you all, uzi.

The dial does not need to be removed just to remove the balance. Regulation will not solve the variances between DU & DD positions. 

  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, clockboy said:

The dial does not need to be removed just to remove the balance. 

If the dial is not removed there is no access to the lower jewel and the work is not complete. And without taking the mov.t fully apart, servicing would not be complete anyway.

Posted
15 hours ago, clockboy said:

The dial does not need to be removed just to remove the balance. Regulation will not solve the variances between DU & DD positions. 

Sorry guys I was not thinking straight. JDM is correct the dial does have to be removed. 

However the main point I wish to make is, regulating is not going to resolve this issue. I suspect it is just the balance needs cleaning & re-lubeing but if  uzi does not want to remove the dial then it is best left alone or passed onto a watch repairer. 

Posted

Hi all,

thank you very much for your answers.

I agree that current performance is not justifying dial removal. I thought maybe to clean / re lube only the upper balance jewel (which actually is the basis for the balance while running DU). Does it make sense?

anyhow, I do not plan to take it to watch repairer, I'm the one to do it if it's getting worse...

thx, uzi.

Posted
7 hours ago, uzii said:

I agree that current performance is not justifying dial removal. I thought maybe to clean / re lube only the upper balance jewel (which actually is the basis for the balance while running DU). Does it make sense?

Yes the balance pivot stands on the upper jewel when DU but the Swiss lever escape is a delicate mechanism with a lot of  intervening factors, so you have no guarantee whatsoever on the results of partial job, and in fact not even of these of a complete one.

Since the timekeeping on the wrist is still good, I recommend leaving this piece undisturbed for the time being.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/16/2017 at 8:38 AM, jdm said:

I recommend that in no case  you try to work on this valuable watch yourself. The positional variance is not ideal but not large either.

 

Honestly... this guy owns the watch so there isn't an ethical problem with his trying to repair the watch for a customer. While we might suggest that he buy cheap practice watches to learn on,  it is his decision and his property. My point is that no one will learn to work on a watch without breaking some movements and if he wants to do it with this piece, then no one should advise him to the contrary. It might be an expensive lesson, but it might also be a very educational one. I say he should attack it , but be prepared to wreck the movement. I've lost count of how many mistakes I've made and how many movements I've destroyed. We all know it's inevitable in the learning process.

  • Like 1
Posted
. My point is that no one will learn to work on a watch without breaking some movements and if he wants to do it with this piece, then no one should advise him to the contrary.
For one, his watch is not broken. And then I will gladly continue to advise begineers again working on expensive pieces no matter who owns them. Call it good old common sense which seems to have been well received in this case.
Posted
4 minutes ago, jdm said:
1 hour ago, tmac1956 said:
. My point is that no one will learn to work on a watch without breaking some movements and if he wants to do it with this piece, then no one should advise him to the contrary.

For one, his watch is not broken. And then I will gladly continue to advise begineers again working on expensive pieces no matter who owns them. Call it good old common sense which seems to have been well received in this case.

 

You mean you will continue to advise beginners not to work on watches so that they never get any better at the craft. You call it good 'ol common sense, but I call it an unwillingness to share information with beginners. Ironically, this is utterly contrary to the whole point of this site and its creator. I see this arrogance on most of these sites. 
 

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, tmac1956 said:

You mean you will continue to advise beginners not to work on watches so that they never get any better at the craft. You call it good 'ol common sense, but I call it an unwillingness to share information with beginners. Ironically, this is utterly contrary to the whole point of this site and its creator. I see this arrogance on most of these sites. 

I think you haven't read what i wrote, which is advising beginner against working on expensive pieces, from there your hurried and uncalled for judgement on my intentions. Have a look to my posting history to see myself sharing the little knowledge that I posses; I look forward to see your.

Posted

I still say it is probably a binding issue between the pivot cone and the jewel. A difference in friction will cause a difference in timing. That is the whole reason for testing the timing in different positions. Until this is looked at it cannot be ruled out. 

david

Posted
3 hours ago, tmac1956 said:

You mean you will continue to advise beginners not to work on watches so that they never get any better at the craft. You call it good 'ol common sense, but I call it an unwillingness to share information with beginners. Ironically, this is utterly contrary to the whole point of this site and its creator. I see this arrogance on most of these sites. 
 

JDM is just giving good sensible advice. The best way to learn is by practice for sure but if the repairer is not comfortable in removing a dial then leave alone until more competent & confident.

  • Like 1
Posted

Hello everyone,

As I see the discussion was somehow de-focus, I’d like 1st to thank everyone for sharing the advises and the knowledge. Now, let me share with you few things about me and the way I see it.

I’m a watch/clock hobbyist and definitely not a watch repairer so I’m not going to argue with anyone, I’m just asking questions, bringing my thoughts and trying to gain as much knowledge and experience from the experts here.

As part of my hobby I did few “things” in this area such as full service of my Omega cal620 and my Atmos clock repair & service (posted in this lovely forum).

One of the main growing engine for me in whole life is the curiosity and the fact that I’m not afraid to pay price in case something get wrong. (I heard many times in my life things like “leave it – you won’t be able to fix it…” and this is exactly what gives me the motivation J)

Having this in mind, I do everything by myself starting from big mechanics such as car fixing through home appliance fixing all the way to clock / watch repairing.

One can see that also here I’m not afraid diving into this but still I think that it’s not came into the point it is justified. As watch beginner, one of my difficulties is putting back the hands, or to be more accurate the minutes hand. While the hour hand can go straight and set parallel to the dial, the minutes hand sometimes not sitting correctly in parallel to the hour hand/dial and I’m always afraid to bent it…

Well again thank you ALL!

Posted
21 minutes ago, uzii said:

As watch beginner, one of my difficulties is putting back the hands, or to be more accurate the minutes hand. While the hour hand can go straight and set parallel to the dial, the minutes hand sometimes not sitting correctly in parallel to the hour hand/dial and I’m always afraid to bent it…

This is how I do it. Hour hand to to 6, move back and forth a tiny bit to average "slack", press in minute hand at 12. It just helps me visually.

Posted
1 hour ago, jdm said:

This is how I do it. Hour hand to to 6, move back and forth a tiny bit to average "slack", press in minute hand at 12. It just helps me visually.

I wasn't talking about alignment of the hands to point directly on the makings each hour. My problem is how to push the minute hand in such a way that it will be parallel with the hour hand (if I look from the side, sometimes the edge of the minute hand goes up instead of keeping straight like the hour hand does)

Posted
46 minutes ago, uzii said:

My problem is how to push the minute hand in such a way that it will be parallel with the hour hand (if I look from the side, sometimes the edge of the minute hand goes up instead of keeping straight like the hour hand does)

That is called "hand stacking".

When you use an pen-like pusher, you do not have the best control, it's easy to place too much force, or place it not vertically, In that case you may use a press-type hand setter.

But since we know from your words that you have placed together less than an handful of wrist watches, I wouldn't worry about it, just keep practicing.

  • Like 1
Posted

Uzii,

If you go to Ebay and punch in item number 351931298862, you will see a watch hand pressing device for less than $10.00.

david

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
×
×
  • Create New...