Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I have serviced a watch for a friend and the rotor functions when you turn it worth a toothpick, however, when I wear it for a long period, it is not Winding the watch. Kind of looks like it does not swing freely enough.

Thought? Could it be magnetism. The rotor seems a little light in weight.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted
  On 1/11/2017 at 3:41 AM, SSTEEL said:
What is the movement?


It is a Chinese knockoff in a knockoff rolex. Sorry for distracting people with this but my friend really likes the watch110d8c22daaececfc540062760d9e233.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted

Remove the case back and get a photo of the movement, I'm guessing there will be a cheap 21j movement in there.  Check the oscillating weight central screw to ensure its not come loose, because if it has, there's your problem.

Posted

It could be the oscillating bearing. I had this with a ETA a while ago luckily the part was available. If it is like a Breiltling copy/fake there is no bearing just a bushing made of cheap metal that wears away.  

Posted

As suspected, its a 21J cheap movement.  I used to repair these in the past, but quickly realised that they ar throwaway movements, and are not worthy of repair time.  Simply replace is the cheaper option.

Posted

It might be worth cleaning the reversing wheels then treating them with Fixodrop (Epilame) or ETA Lubeta.

This is a crap movement but it did work I presume when new so it would be worth a try. 

Posted

He just might like to try and repair it, its a challenge so good luck in what ever you do. I would look at the auto wind first going through it in stages that is the best way of fault finding. Movements do come to an end and this just might be one as others have said its not a very good movement.  

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 1/12/2017 at 8:53 AM, oldhippy said:

He just might like to try and repair it, its a challenge so good luck in what ever you do. I would look at the auto wind first going through it in stages that is the best way of fault finding. Movements do come to an end and this just might be one as others have said its not a very good movement.  

Expand  

I had several of such movements, non of them had an efficiently working autowinder. :unsure:



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Making a stud pin for a pocketwatch from 1mm copper wire, softer than brass but it will do the job. The lathe cost 3 pound including the chuck, powered from an old electric shaver adapter. 
    • And I'm already very pleased with my life choices...
    • Demagnetizers work on the principle of a decaying magnetic field. Whether the expensive Elma or the cheap Chinese...same principle. For the cheap ones, you are decaying the magnetic field manually by drawing the watch away from the demagnetizer while it is energized. The Elma (and others) generates a decaying magnetic field electronically so you don't have to do the work. If you use the cheap ones properly,  they will do the job. I prefer the Elma style...but that is just me.
    • I also still use my cheap first set of screwdrivers. I replaced the blades of the smallest (0.6mm) with higher quality once I had bent a few of the originals, but beyond that I have been fine. Note though that I do not work on any remotely valuable watches and most of what I deal with are in a truly terrible state, watches that have been banging around in kitchen drawers or toolboxes. So my concern for screw head slot integrity and scratches is usually not very high.  As for a loupe - you won't need anything powerful for an ST36 that is new. You don't need to do close inspection of balance pivots because they will not be worn out, and a 3x or 5x loupe is perfectly sufficient to see the oiling. I don't have any microscope or powerful magnification of any sort. I just use cheap loupes. But again this would be different if I were working with more valuable watches. And if I had equipment to burnish pivots, then I would get a microscope to check my work.
    • I've recently switched over to using a x2.5 -x3 eyeglass for disassembly and some larger part assembly. It's interesting to see how accustomed and trained your eyes become to that way of working after using a microscope for years. And pick up and work at eyelevel when possible. Personally I would stick with and learn to use regular oilers efficiently. 
×
×
  • Create New...