Jump to content

Replacing a watch crystal lens


Recommended Posts

I have been asked to service a watch and if possible I was asked if I could change the badly damaged crystal. The movement is a cheap pin lever movement but the challenge was the crystal. The crystal had a lens attached to it’s inside & also a chapter ring fitted to its inside. 

I think there was a similar post last week with one of these. To remove the chapter ring from the old crystal I just pushed the crystal down from its centre using a Robur glass press to open it & chapter ring came away.

 

I could not purchase the correct size replacement crystal with the correct size lens. The old crystal was a high dome 320mm diameter. However despite my best efforts I could not press the chapter ring into a new 320mm diameter crystal so I fitted a 322mm crystal with the chapter seated inside.

However when pressed into the watch the chapter ring tightened. The lens was fitted with Seiko two part clear glue. I marked the inside of the glass to aid it’s position. I also fitted the lens to the outside which the customer was happy with. See pics.

I will do a separate post re- the pin lever movement assembly etc.

 

OLD CRYTAL + CHAPTER RING

DSC_6853.JPG

 

Pressing in the new Crystal + chapter ring

IMG_1058.jpg

 

Crystal marked ready for lens

 

IMG_1059.jpg

 

New lens fitted job done

IMG_1061.jpg

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good one clockboy, Robur glass press is a very good tool, individual magnify windows are really good and a God send. 320 high dome in my time was a popular size, but there no good holding a tension ring in place, they lack the inside ridge to hold the thing. I'm surprised others haven't made comments on this after all many on here are always asking about watch glass fitting and how to over come problems.    

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now I'm making do with a similar micrometer (the one below is $45 shipped but you can find better deals) and a $20 stand. You do have to be excruciatingly careful measuring jewels, since there's no table, but if you don't have the $500 to throw around, it's a nice option.
    • As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!
    • Next one up an AS 554, looks like a bit more to this one. First job is to check thickness, most springs are somewhere between .3 and .4, this one measures .35, that matches in with the .4 spring steel i ordered. So for marking up a permanent marker comes in handy to colour up the steel to be marked later with a scriber once its dry. Bestfit provide the extra bit of info for the jumper spring that is missing.
    • Thanks again, Marc.  Super helpful. I was wondering what the hole was for, and now it makes perfect sense. With your help and the other members here, it looks like I'm good to go with my Seitz tool set. I had to order some replacement pushers, but with those, the set is complete and in good condition. Now, I need to figure out what tool to buy to measure jewels (amongst other watch-related parts). I had my eye on the JKA Feintaster micrometers, but people get crazy bidding on them for $400-600 USD. I was thinking of just a regular digital micrometer (Mitutoyo). Thoughts?  Mahalo. Frank      
    • Yep, that's exactly how it should fit. The reamer shank is tapered and the socket in the spindle is also tapered so that the one centers in the other and is gripped tightly. If there is any wobble when the reamer is seated as far it will go then there is a problem. The cross hole in the spindle is to allow you the push the reamer back out again. If the reamer seated much deeper then it would limit the access for pushing it back out again. Here is one of mine for comparison.
×
×
  • Create New...