Jump to content

Frequency Question.


Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, ftwizard said:

Is that the reason for differing rates? 

Theory says that the higher the frequency, the better the accuracy. But wear and manufacturing difficulty increase also.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, ftwizard said:

Is that the reason for differing rates? Do you have a formula for the wheel teeth?

Well, no formula needed. The second wheel should make one revolution per minute :woohoo-jumping-smiley-emoticon: If You count the transmission ratio to the escape wheel the bph can be calculated.

This is just a fictive example: If the escape wheel has per say 10 teeth and the ratio between the escape wheel and second wheel is per say 20, then the escape wheel does 20 revolutions per minute and 200 ticks and tocks. So multiply it by 60 means 12000 bph. Yeah i know weird example :D

Edited by szbalogh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you have two questions the first is the frequent the movement runs at is known as Period of oscillation. Detailed description link found below simple definition physical characteristics of the hairspring and balance wheel.

Second question you can do the gear ratios like everyone said and come up with the rate it's supposed to run out.

As far as I can tell for the most part looking at a balance wheel and hairspring you can't tell what frequency runs at. Then for some high-frequency watches 36,000 some of the stopwatches that run even faster the hairsprings start to get stiff. So when you lift the balance out of the watch the balance wheel barely sags with the hairspring being so stiff. Then basically for anything that looks like a balance wheel of American pocket watch you can assume it runs in 18,000 although a few ran at a lower frequency.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_wheel

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you have two questions the first is the frequent the movement runs at is known as Period of oscillation. 

I think that as with everything cyclical, period is actually the inverse of the frequency. Please excuse the nitpick [emoji5]
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Never seen that but yes very practical Hector 
    • Welcome, Simeon! I'm into Soviet watches too (not the political system, and yes, I am able to make the distinction, unlike some). They offer amazing value for money. I like your "Big Zero" profile image. It's a true classic and I have one of those myself. I noticed that the hands aren't the original. Not that it matters a lot but here's an interesting article about the Big Zero if you haven't already seen it.
    • I was thinking will the gasket stretch at all to match the desired size.  Did i also deduce that the original gasket is thinner (0 .5mm ) than the cousins gasket ( 0.8mm )  could that just be an effect of you measuring the case for the gasket size  H  ?
    • if we look at and understand why steel becomes magnetised and unmagnetised then its possible to work out why some devices are better than others. Simpy it is a parallel alignment of atoms , electrons within a material caused by external magnetic fields. Different magnetic fields cause different alignments and non alignment of atoms. Fields by AC currents are changing atom direction approx 50 times per second ( 50hz ). As a material is drawn away from a demagging device the field is becoming progressively weaker while also changing the material's atom direction having the effect of returning their random directions ( demagnetising ) . To improve on this demagetising effect, try changing the material's orientation as it is drawn away.  Fields caused by DC currents have the most permanent magnetising effect as the currect is flowing one way only. A good demagger would produce random magnet fields and disorientation of the material's atoms.  
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.  
×
×
  • Create New...