Jump to content

Hamilton Odyssee 2001....


Recommended Posts

I went to the library and was looking through the small section of watch books they had on the shelves when I came across a Hamilton Odyssee 2001 from around 1968 - 69 .                      I immediately thought of the Stanley Kubrick movie , " 2001: A Space Odyssey ", and found out that indeed this watch has a connection to the movie .

http://shop.1025vintage.com/products/hamilton-odyssee-2001

http://thewatchspotblog.com/?p=4890

 

 

When I saw the watch in the book it grabbed me and I knew I had to have it . I guess luck was on my side , because when i got home and searched for it I found one up for sale on Ebay with a BIN price or make offer . I made an offer that was $225 less then the asking price and forgot about it . Two days later I got a message that the seller agreed to my offer so we made the deal . There are 2 versions of this watch that were made and I got the second version . The dial , hands and bracelet are a bit different . On mine the hands have serrated lines the length of the hand and the buckle matches this design .

 

 

DSC00003.JPG

DSC00004.JPG

DSC00007.JPG

DSC00018.JPG

DSC00021.JPG

 

The case back is stamped with the Fontainebleau logo that Hamilton had a series of in the late 60's and early 70's .  I decided to do a service on it and wad fortunate to find the watch featured in " The Watch Spot Blog " where the author was kind enough to pass on the trick on how to get the movement out of the case . That information is in one of the links I've attached .

 

This is an Automatic winding watch that has a Hamilton Cal. 64 movement which is actually an ETA 2472 movement . A very well made movement that lined up the parameters on my timegrapher perfectly .

I can say that I am very pleased with the appearance of this watch and that it is very comfortable on the wrist .

 

DSC00027.JPG

DSC00029.JPG

 

Edited by ricardopalamino
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, jdm said:

Nice helmet look, if it was in my hands I'd take it as a polishing challenge emoji4.png

Thanks jdm ,

I lightly sanded , [600 , 1500 , and 2000 grit ] , and polished the crystal and lightly polished the case this morning . The crystal came out super and I don't want to over polish the case and lose any edges . I didn't use my buffing wheel because of that .

It really does look nice in person  .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On December 10, 2016 at 7:09 AM, jdm said:

I've found that the "ruining edges" issue is vastly exaggerated. Just use the proper compound and avoid edges as much as possible. 

Howzit jdm , 

                  I have done that in the past and have really improved my buffing and polishing skills after watching the Youtube video ,"Introduction To Buffing & Polishing - YouTube " by perplxr .

I am satisfied with the finish on my watch so I'll leave it . Honestly . It looks good .

Aloha , Louis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...