Jump to content

Beat error


BUSAKAZ

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I'm a bit confused as to why the beat error is so far out when the pallet fork is dead center to the banking pins and the balance is at rest under no tension, can someone please explain.

thanks kaz

Ps I can't seem to regulate the rate neither,I have demagnetize it three times and the hair spring isn't touching the cock neither.

WP_20161116_17_26_28_Pro.jpgWP_20161116_17_34_04_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, frenchie said:

Just a guess: Low amplitude and running fast = not enough power to the train (or lots of power being wasted, ie dirty jewel holes)...

 

it's had a new main spring and the train runs freely without the Pallet fork in, a bit confused :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think beat error is your least problem at the moment. 5ms can be better, but is not an issue.

No wonder regulating is difficult: your hairspring is not concentric in the pins area, and it has a kink at the regulator pins. Also the pins are too wide apart, space must be minimal here (unfortunately this will speed up the rate).

Yes, as mentioned before, amplitude is much too low (which esc. angle did you choose?)

Regards, 

Frank

Edited by praezis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, praezis said:

I think beat error is your least problem at the moment. 5ms can be better, but is not an issue.

No wonder regulating is difficult: your hairspring is not concentric in the pins area, and it has a kink at the regulator pins. Also the pins are too wide apart, space must be minimal here (unfortunately this will speed up the rate).

Yes, as mentioned before, amplitude is much too low (which esc. angle did you choose?)

Regards, 

Frank

do the pins have to be nearly touching at the bottom then ?

it's on automatically and came up at 52deg as do all of my pocket watches, where do you see the kink after the pins or between the pins and the stud.

thanks for your help

 

 

 

 

WP_20161116_19_52_31_Pro.jpg

Edited by BUSAKAZ
pic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

the kink I see in your 2nd picture, maybe I am wrong.

Pins are better, but still not close enough - and they should be parallel. Difficult with these rather thick pins, I know. But these are subtleties that you can fix later.

Main issue is the low amplitude.

52° is ok for nearly all wrist watches. Pocket watches have smaller angles, about 40°. Bad news: Your amplitude is probably 20% lower than your display shows, as the esc. angle was set too high.

Regards, Frank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, praezis said:

Hi,

the kink I see in your 2nd picture, maybe I am wrong.

Pins are better, but still not close enough - and they should be parallel. Difficult with these rather thick pins, I know. But these are subtleties that you can fix later.

Main issue is the low amplitude.

52° is ok for nearly all wrist watches. Pocket watches have smaller angles, about 40°. Bad news: Your amplitude is probably 20% lower than your display shows, as the esc. angle was set too high.

Regards, Frank

I don't think they should be parallel if you look at the second picture at the top of the pins there is a clear gap, I will get them closer and see what it does then, I can't see a kink though and I will also try 40 deg.

thanks for your help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have noticed this too i.e. the roller impulse pin seems in the middle at rest but when running & put on a timing machine the beat goes out. I guess there is some sort of uneven bounce happens & that is what throws it out but i am not sure & I have just adjusted the beat. 

The beat error on your watch will have to be adjusted by moving the hairspring collet & Mark has a vid on this. The rate is adjusted buy in effect shortening or lengthening the hairspring. This works by the spring vibrating in-between the regulating pins so if the rate is not changing then the spring is not in-between the pins. It is worth noting that at rest the hairspring should be in the middle of the regulating pins & not touching them. 

PS. Looking at your pics there does not seem a lot wrong with the hairspring shape. Another thought is it a new hairspring fitted ? if so it could be too short.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a video how to determine the correct lift angle. You have to notice the amplitude and set the lift angle on the timing machine until it shows the real amplitude.

It seemed to me that the overcoil is higher at the regulating pins than the stud. This wont allow the overcoil to wobble between the pins and bend the hairspring. Try to elevate the stud a bit.

Check also again that the overcoil is not touching the cock. Just twist the balance to ~300 deg. amplitude with a toothpick. This is suspicious, since YOu have both low amplitude and beat error despite the properly positioned impulse jewel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, szbalogh said:

I have a video how to determine the correct lift angle. You have to notice the amplitude and set the lift angle on the timing machine until it shows the real amplitude.

It seemed to me that the overcoil is higher at the regulating pins than the stud. This wont allow the overcoil to wobble between the pins and bend the hairspring. Try to elevate the stud a bit.

Check also again that the overcoil is not touching the cock. Just twist the balance to ~300 deg. amplitude with a toothpick. This is suspicious, since YOu have both low amplitude and beat error despite the properly positioned impulse jewel. 

top man I will give it a go as soon as I can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, clockboy said:

Determining the lift angle & setting the timegrapgher to correct setting will only make a marginal difference to the readings. I very rarely bother to adjust from the standard of 52 deg.

you are correct changing the lift angle made absolutely no effect but what I have done is closed the pins in a bit more and I had the train bridge to tight so slackened it off and the amplitude has now shot up.

WP_20161118_17_13_21_Pro.jpg

WP_20161118_16_28_44_Pro.jpgWP_20161118_16_29_35_Pro.jpg

also I straightened up the spring from the pins to the stud so I am now thinking how to get the rate down and I is definitely not touching the cock, but it is getting better and it is still the original hairspring.

still need help, it a southbend 411 12size but if anyone knows the lift angle that would be good.

thanks for your help guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the bridge is causing the hairspring not to swing either the bridge is bent or the balance staff is too long (marginally).
I strongly suspect a new hairspring & balance has been fitted but the hairspring is just to short. There just does not seem enough of the hairspring remaining to reduce by 130 s/d. This PDF explains better than I could.

Hairspring choosing.pdf

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, clockboy said:

If the bridge is causing the hairspring not to swing either the bridge is bent or the balance staff is too long (marginally).
I strongly suspect a new hairspring & balance has been fitted but the hairspring is just to short. There just does not seem enough of the hairspring remaining to reduce by 130 s/d. This PDF explains better than I could.

Hairspring choosing.pdf

 

 

I think I have found the problem, if you look at the hairspring at three o'clock the spring is touching what do you think.

WP_20161118_19_31_26_Pro.jpgWP_20161118_19_32_45_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, you have not mentioned whether or not the movement has been fully cleaned and lubricated? 

A reading like yours generally points to the escapement, in which case a full examination of the balance assembly (bridge, staff, balance wheel truth and poise, roller table, impulse jewel, hairspring, collet, regulator pins, stud), pallets, lever, escape wheel and jewels must be conducted to locate the error. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JMElam said:

Also, you have not mentioned whether or not the movement has been fully cleaned and lubricated? 

A reading like yours generally points to the escapement, in which case a full examination of the balance assembly (bridge, staff, balance wheel truth and poise, roller table, impulse jewel, hairspring, collet, regulator pins, stud), pallets, lever, escape wheel and jewels must be conducted to locate the error. 

fully cleaned and oiled with moebius 8000

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just got these good quality diamond files from the bay for Just a fiver, we all love a bargain dont we. Brand names are J.K.Smit  and Triefus, two old diamond tool makers so not cheap crap.
    • Its a touch under ive just remeasured it and added a wrist shot. Unbelievably it was £13  plus 3 postage. You dont find watches that nice for that money every day of the week. Maybe removing the epilame in the oil region improves the purpose of it. We may know very soon as i emailed Episurf 4 hours ago to ask that exact question. 🤞they are happy to provide an answer for us. How do you fancy trying a stearic acid vapour treatment experiment  H .  Shall i have a go this afternoon ? Stearic acid experiment underway,  its started to melt at around  65° C. The idea is to find a large cap jewel to suspend over the vapour release. 
    • That's the size of my grandfather's Ernest Borel watch. Definitely not a lady's watch! 👍
    • Thanks H It does have a big crown for the watch , it could be considered a ladies watch these days i guess, it measures 33mm case 36mm with that large crown 18mm lug space. A tad small for a guy of today, but still very wearable. The photo was deceptive so here it is adorning my 7 1/4 " wrist. It need some love to make it run better. The hair coils are touching so running a bit fast at the moment,  not caused by magnetism, and maybe just a clean and a service. The dtal is in fantastic shape.
    • That's one beautiful timepiece! Love the big crown in proportion to the case. Perhaps a ladies' watch, but I don't think so. I have a "modern Ingersoll" watch, but it has nothing to do with the original brand (Miyota 9015 movement). Interesting synonym for synthetic oils! 😆 There is, of course, a limit to how large a volume of oil epilame can bind and hold in place. If the oleophobic effect is too strong then it can become a problem. I'm not sure where I heard or read it, but as I understand it, the active ingredient in a bottle of epilame is extremely small and more than 99% of the contents of the bottle is just a transfer agent. If the active ingredient becomes too concentrated, which it can become over time, or if the product is of poor quality, the oleophobic effect is amplified. This in turn causes the applied oil to look like a gummed-up ball on the surface of the treated part. If that happens, we know that the active ingredient has become too concentrated. What we want is for the oil to bind but not to the point where it is formed into an excessively round ball on the surface. The highlighted text in the patent that you refer to describes well the problem that can arise with too high a concentration of the active ingredient. However, I would be extremely surprised if the entire amount of oil leaves the treated surface as water on wax would. At present, I am convinced that the analogy between wax and water on the one hand and epilame and oil on the other is incorrect. Epilame is described as binding and that is also my absolute experience. Epilame probably has some repelling effect but that is not its main purpose and that is not how epilame is designed and works. The method of abrading the epilame treatment from the section of the pallet stones coming in contact with the escape wheel teeth seems after even more research to be well established, but if it actually works, if so how and why is beyond what I can currently understand. Perhaps it is just to do and trust that it is based on well-established experience. I am, after all, inclined to think so.
×
×
  • Create New...