Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I purchased a couple of movements that I found interesting to use in future builds.

 

I've always wanted to build a watch with a Tourbillon movement! And now with these little Chinese made tourbillons getting better and better (and more reliable), I could not pass up the opportunity to try one!

This is a very nice looking Skeleton movement that features a 1 minute "Flying" tourbillon escapement. It seems to be well made and for just $329US I think it's pretty good Value!

post-90-0-08846000-1401293727_thumb.jpg

 

post-90-0-20328400-1401293728_thumb.jpg

 

 

The second movement is just plain cool with the dual escapements. Only one actually regulates the watch's timing while the other just scavenges power of the mainspring while the watch is running. I believe it's modeled to look like a antique Breguet pocket watch movement. Kind of cool for just $38US!

 

post-90-0-18894400-1401293726_thumb.jpg

Posted (edited)

Hi Don, I look forward to seeing the finished items, particularly the Tourbillon.

The Chinese Tourbillon movements were good enough for the British Horological Institute to commission them to commemorate their 150 year anniversary. That must be a good recommendation.

I purchased a version of that watch about three years ago and I'm well pleased with it.

Edited by Geo
  • Like 1
Posted

Hi Don, I look forward to seeing the finished items, particularly the Tourbillon.

The Chinese Tourbillon movements were good enough for the British Horological Institute to commission them to commemorate their 150 year anniversary. That must be a good recommendation.

I purchased a version of that watch about three years ago and I'm well pleased with it.

 

Was that the BHI 150 - available initially to members only? I was quite surprised to read at the time that they'd gone for a Chinese Tourbillon. Was there also not a second issue of this a little bit later?

Posted

Hi Will, from what I remember there were two costs, one for members and one for non-members. The one I purchased was identical but without inscription. It really is well made and keeps such good time it could be certified as a chronometer.

Posted

Thats a very nice Tourbillon mov. you have there and should make a really special sort of watch,  can't wait to see the finished article.  The Chinese are on a learning curve at the moment and seeing that they are very hard working people they will eventually be No.1 in most things.

 

It's nice to see the mechanical watch still going strong after 400 odd years,  not many things last that long.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm a funny person, I can't stand Chronographs & I'm not a fan of Skeleton movements either. I like plain & simple!

Posted

I'm not a huge fan of Skeleton movements myself, but this movement was the best option since the manufacturer does not supply dials. So, I figured that I could case the movement easier with out a dial.....

 

Well, I'm making a dial anyway! At least an outer dial ring to adapt it to one of my cases. Even though this movement has mounting points for dial feet, I'm making the dial to be "Friction Fit". This way, I can have almost all of the movement visible and not hiding behind the dial.

 

The movement is extremely thick and has the stem is located well towards the bottom of the movement. This is an awkward location for the stem with regards to mounting it in a unrelated case. I have to use a oversized case with enough room to adjust the location of the movement so that the stem lines up with the existing crown. Then I have to "relieve" the lip that the dial sits against to allow for the movement to be positioned in the exact location for the stem to line up with the crown.

 

It's fiddly work but I actually like this sort of thing!

 

I'll post some pictures as I progress....

Posted

Looking forward to seeing those for sure. That wasn't a criticism in anyway, more a thinking out loud!

Posted

Update...

 

I finished milling the dial and modifying the case to accept the movement....

 

Since the movement is Silver and the case is polished, I'm thinking of having the skeleton dial painted a flat gray or silver and have some fancy Arabic numerals printed in Navy/Royal Blue to match the Blue Breguet hands I plan on using. 

 

I took a pic through the stem tube to show that the stem will now line up with the crown. I had to turn the dial seat down about 1mm so that the new movement would line up!

 

I still have to turn a ring for the back of the watch because the tourbillon movement is much smaller than the ETA 6497/98 movement that this case was intended for...

 

post-90-0-65061400-1401473463_thumb.jpg

post-90-0-35012100-1401473465_thumb.jpg

post-90-0-06408300-1401473467_thumb.jpg

post-90-0-78807100-1401473468_thumb.jpg

post-90-0-13934700-1401473470_thumb.jpg

post-90-0-44396600-1401473471_thumb.jpg

post-90-0-48625000-1401473472_thumb.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Posted

That will be a mighty fine watch when finished $1,500 +  and worth every cent,  it looks brilliant as it is.

 

Your a bit good at this turning lark.   :thumbsu:

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the update Don. As an engineer, I really appreciate the intricacy work that you are doing. I'm looking forward to the next instalment.

  • Like 1
Posted

I can see that chapter ring in white (porcelain?) with some nice Arabic numerals.  I have increased my estimate for the finished watch to US$2,350 and at that they are getting a bargain.

  • Like 1
Posted

I can see that chapter ring in white (porcelain?) with some nice Arabic numerals.  I have increased my estimate for the finished watch to US$2,350 and at that they are getting a bargain.

Roger, have you ever thought of taking up a job in watch sales?

  • Like 1
Posted

Wow! Beautiful. May I ask where you found these movements? I like both but would love to play around with the Breguet in particular. I can imagine all sorts of dials.

Thank you,

Alec

Posted

Wow! Beautiful. May I ask where you found these movements? I like both but would love to play around with the Breguet in particular. I can imagine all sorts of dials.

Thank you,

Alec

Alec,

you can find these at www.ptsresources.com

The minimum order quantity for the tourbillon movements is only 1 piece. But, all other movements require 100 pcs minimum when ordering. I was able to buy just one of each as "Samples". They charge $30 sample fee for anything other than a minimum quantity order. Plus, it cost me $40 to wire money to their account for these two movements. FYI, They only accept wire transfers.

So, if you order a Sample of the "Breguet" style movement, it would cost you roughly $108US for that $38 movement ($40+$30+$38).

Posted (edited)

Taking it out for a test drive! I kind of like the dial the way it is! I was thinking about drilling shallow circles at the 12, 3, 6 and 9 position and smaller circles at the other hour marks, then filling them with color, black or blue.

 

post-90-0-38196700-1401741705_thumb.jpg

Edited by DJW
  • Like 2
Posted

i think its kind of cool, less is more so to speak, little bit of thinking outside the box there, the dial detracts nothing from the movement.

Posted

I think you have found the holy grail with that mov. case, hands and your dial ring, so many ways it could be finished. You are probably aware of a pantograph engraving machine, if not have a look on YouTube, it really opens up more possibilities for finishing the chapter ring.

 

Whatever you do, do not sell this watch too cheap, common chinese tourbillons fetch around US$ 2,000 and people with money are willing to pay for exclusivity and they do not come much more exclusive than yours. I would say it's your best watch so far.  :thumbsu:

Posted

Whatever you put on the chapter ring - numbers, markers, quarter markers, etc. - I think a minimalist approach would be good, so that the simplicity contrasts with the complexity of the movement, and vice versa. Lovely job.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...