Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all, this is my first post so please be gentle, I can wind it up about 4 turns and then something slips and looses all its tension and I wind it again and it does the same thing, so I brought a new mainspring from cousins uk out of the GR book page 195 under 16s 1899 witch lists it as part no 6991-TR as a 0.19 thickness, in my E.& J. SWIGART CO book it lists it as 4 different sizes 0.19  0.18  0.17  0.16  0.15, when I put the new spring in it done the same thing so I striped it down again thinking winding pinion teeth and crown wheel are badly warn but they are not !!, so with the crown wheel removed I tried to wind it up with a screwdriver and it still slipped, so I tried to close the spring tighter you guessed it SNAP, so I got another one but an 0.18 thickness put it in and still the same so my question is what am I doing wrong ??? do I still need to squeeze it in or should it be ok straight out of the box.

Many thanks Kaz

Thu Jun 09 20-04-55.jpgThu Jun 09 20-07-30.jpgThu Jun 09 20-08-43.jpgThu Jun 09 20-10-53.jpgThu Jun 09 20-14-09.jpgThu Jun 09 20-16-14.jpgThu Jun 09 20-20-43.jpgThu Jun 09 20-24-35.jpg

Posted
18 hours ago, syfre said:

what you have is a Waltham motor barrel, the problem is at the other end, the spring slips at the barrel hook.

The end of the spring must be shaped to match the barrel wall, some explanation here :

http://mb.nawcc.org/showthread.php?68116-Waltham-Motor-Barrel-Mainspring-will-not-catch

Thanks for the reply, this is a pic of the actual spring, it all looks spot on to me but I know nothing, do you mean bend it in a bit the last 5 mm ?, I can't see how it can jump out as it is hooked it and the more you wind it the tighter it becomes.

many thanks for your help KazFri Jun 10 16-42-38.jpgFri Jun 10 16-41-17.jpgFri Jun 10 16-46-12.jpgFri Jun 10 16-46-21.jpg 

Posted
2 hours ago, syfre said:

1.9ms beat error is (very) good for these watch, personally i will not touch it.

 

so is this better.WP_20160612_22_09_05_Pro.jpg

Posted
18 hours ago, BUSAKAZ said:

so is this better.WP_20160612_22_09_05_Pro.jpg

I think this is the best I am going to get it what do you think guys

 

Dial up

WP_20160613_16_50_06_Pro.jpg

Stem down

WP_20160613_16_52_16_Pro.jpg

Posted

I like these conversions. I know a lot of people feel they are a Frankenstein watch but in my opinion it's nothing different than putting a seagull movement in a aftermarket case and making your own dial. Hey, Tiffany never made their own watches. I think these watches allow people to wear a beautiful movement again. Im in the process of making one as well as a gift. Good luck your watch looks great

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
On ‎17‎/‎06‎/‎2016 at 10:23 PM, jdm said:

It's really nice. How do you wind it? Where did you sourced the case?

I drilled a hole in the side and put a stem in a pin vice and just wind it like a key wound pocket watch.(hunter movement)

the case I came across on eBay with some other stuff, I can't believe how accurate the watch keeps time.

Posted
On ‎17‎/‎06‎/‎2016 at 10:53 PM, Joeydwatchmaker said:

I like these conversions. I know a lot of people feel they are a Frankenstein watch but in my opinion it's nothing different than putting a seagull movement in a aftermarket case and making your own dial. Hey, Tiffany never made their own watches. I think these watches allow people to wear a beautiful movement again. Im in the process of making one as well as a gift. Good luck your watch looks great

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

thanks I love it, and a good talking point down the pub. :biggrin:

Posted
I like these conversions. I know a lot of people feel they are a Frankenstein watch but in my opinion it's nothing different than putting a seagull movement in a aftermarket case and making your own dial. Hey, Tiffany never made their own watches. I think these watches allow people to wear a beautiful movement again. Im in the process of making one as well as a gift. Good luck your watch looks great

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for the reply, this is a pic of the actual spring, it all looks spot on to me but I know nothing, do you mean bend it in a bit the last 5 mm ?, I can't see how it can jump out as it is hooked it and the more you wind it the tighter it becomes.

many thanks for your help KazFri Jun 10 16-42-38.jpgFri Jun 10 16-41-17.jpgFri Jun 10 16-46-12.jpgFri Jun 10 16-46-21.jpg 

I think this is the best I am going to get it what do you think guys

 

Dial up

WP_20160613_16_50_06_Pro.jpg

Stem down

WP_20160613_16_52_16_Pro.jpg

Is this a size 0 pocket watch that you put into a wristwatch case?

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, jdrichard said:

 

 

Is this a size 0 pocket watch that you put into a wristwatch case?

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

no 16s

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...