Jump to content

Really magnetized pocket watch


Recommended Posts

Hi all. 

I recently acquired a really lovely Molnija pocket watch in great shape overall. I have dismantled it and already cleaned it and have noticed that all the parts appear to be highly magnetized as evidenced by all the parts sticking to each other like that nasty stuff to a blanket. I don't have a demagnetizer but will have to get one without question, which leads to a couple of questions; hopefully I'm not repeating something that's already been answered in the forums.

First question is should I go for the Etic demagnetizer that Marc mentions in one of his videos, or get the cheap Chinese equivalent - or is it not equivalent, or would it be better to get the more expensive tunnel type that you pass the whole watch through? Sorry, that's three questions in one, but they are related.

Second question is, can I still assemble the pocket watch while I wait for the demagnetizer to arrive then demagnetize the assembled watch in one fell swoop - or should I wait for it to arrive then individually demagnetize the parts first before assembly?

Third question is how on earth did the parts become so magnetized in the first place; Is Russia now a hot-bed of magnetic activity?

BTW, I can't afford a nice Bergeon demagnetizer, or more correctly I can afford it just, but can't afford the divorce that would shortly follow its arrival. 

Thanks, I'll await your collective wisdom before doing anything else with the watch. 

Cheers from sunny Edmonton

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all. 

I recently acquired a really lovely Molnija pocket watch in great shape overall. I have dismantled it and already cleaned it and have noticed that all the parts appear to be highly magnetized as evidenced by all the parts sticking to each other like that nasty stuff to a blanket. I don't have a demagnetizer but will have to get one without question, which leads to a couple of questions; hopefully I'm not repeating something that's already been answered in the forums.

First question is should I go for the Etic demagnetizer that Marc mentions in one of his videos, or get the cheap Chinese equivalent - or is it not equivalent, or would it be better to get the more expensive tunnel type that you pass the whole watch through? Sorry, that's three questions in one, but they are related.

Second question is, can I still assemble the pocket watch while I wait for the demagnetizer to arrive then demagnetize the assembled watch in one fell swoop - or should I wait for it to arrive then individually demagnetize the parts first before assembly?

Third question is how on earth did the parts become so magnetized in the first place; Is Russia now a hot-bed of magnetic activity?

BTW, I can't afford a nice Bergeon demagnetizer, or more correctly I can afford it just, but can't afford the divorce that would shortly follow its arrival. 

Thanks, I'll await your collective wisdom before doing anything else with the watch. 

Cheers from sunny Edmonton

As a fellow Canadian, buy the good one it comes with a voucher for a lawyer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My very particular answer is, wait for the demagnetizer. Of course you can work on the watch and then demagnetize but when metal is magnetized lots of particles are naturally attached to it. The magnetized watch is no different so if you demagnetize after cleaning, chances are all the stuff that was attached to the parts (due to magnetism) will be dancing inside the watch and doubling as "sand paper".

If you decide to demagnetize the separate parts you are in for a surprise since the cheapo demagnetizer (regardless of where it comes from) need some sort of "theatrical performance" on your part to work, i.e. you grab the part and place it on the marked spot on the demagnetizer, press the button and start moving -- hopefully with your other hand -- the part away from the demagnetizer, slowly, evenly and in a wide sort of gesture. Eventually, when the part is as far away as possible from the demagnetizer as you can, you let go of the button and the part should be demagnetized...or you have to repeat your performance over again.

This is impossible to do with a bunch of parts regardless since they all acquire a mind of their own and start jumping in the magnetic field and never get demagnetized...or very little if any...or you have to "perform" for each of the 20 plus parts in a watch, and the screws,  and ...well you get the idea. Not a good idea to do it with a hairspring assembly by itself...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both the cheap Chinese copy of the Etic, and a vintage pass through tunnel type of de-magger and to be honest they both do the job, although I find the tunnel type is probably slightly more efficient (and looks a hell of a lot cooler on the bench although that's just my weird sense of aesthetics).B)

I wouldn't spend the extra cash on the big name brands, a de-magger is a de-magger, essentially a coil of copper wire. You may get a better switch on the expensive one but if that bothers you then consider picking up a better quality switch from your local Maplins or Radio Shack and swapping it out on a cheap unit. You still save your money and get the best of both worlds.

 

As Bobm12 says it may be wise to de-mag prior to re-assembly. If there is that much magnetic swarf sticking to the parts then I would want to make sure that they are clean before it goes back together, that way there is much less risk of the debris ending up back in the watch.

I actually de-mag the movement prior to disassembly so that when the parts go through the cleaning machine any swarf is easily flushed away from the parts. I once made the mistake of putting the balance from an ESA 9154 (balance wheel electronic with permanent magnets attached to the wheel) through what looked like reasonably clean solutions in the cleaner, only to find it completely covered in iron filings that it had picked up from previous wash cycles when it came out. It took time, patience, and Rodico to sort out but it made me think about better cleaning practice.

It is also good practice to de-mag the re-assembled movement after cleaning as some cleaning machines can induce magnetism.

 

As for de-magging the parts separately that sounds like a right bore. I would replace the balance / balance cock assembly back onto the main plate to constrain it, and then put everything into some kind of container (with lid) and do it all at once like Cad101 has suggested.

 

As for how it got that way, who knows. I used to work in the fabrication department at Lotus Cars and was always advised to take my watch off before going onto the shop floor, mainly because of the spot welders, but leave it sitting on top of a Hi-Fi speaker for a couple of days and you would probably do the trick.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I did order an Etic demagnetizer in the end, however delivery is really slow and it won't be here for a few weeks so I had to make do with something else in the meanwhile. I read up in the ether world and there were several seemingly good home made designs that anyone could craft, however when I tried one of them I was stymied when I tried to tear an old transformer apart to use it as the laminations were all glued together with a hard varnish. Back to the drawing board. 

The solution I came up with, and that worked quite well, was to simply grip the edge of neodymium disc magnet in the jaws of an electric drill and rotate it at high speed then hover the parts by it and slowly draw them away. I did this twice with the particular parts I was having trouble with and they become completely and magically demagnetized.

I can't think of anything simpler frankly as most people have an electric drill and the magnets are available anywhere. Total cost was about $1. I'll be interested to compare it to the Etic when it finally arrives, though I'm sure the Etic will win the contest - I really hope so as the Etic is about 80 times more expensive than the simple magnet shown. 

I'm sure you'll all be upset to hear that the Oilers didn't make it to the playoffs - again!

Demagnetizer.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome and I have no words! I looove that demagnetizer! Had I known that before, I might have saved a lot of money!

Yes, that oilers news are bad news. Any reason they didn't make it?

Cheers,

Bob

PS. I'll be interested in the demagnetizer comparison!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...