Jump to content

Oris Centennial - Uncasing


Recommended Posts

post-1248-14587335867303.jpg

post-1248-1458733613613.jpg

post-1248-14587336285336.jpg

Hi guys, I just received this Oris Centennial with a loose second hand. But I can't get to uncase it to fix the hand. Hope someone can help with some instructions to uncase it.

The movement with the dial doesn't seem to be able to come out through back as the dial is bigger than the back opening.

It seems the only way is through the front. I've tried to remove the glass using the pump method but failed. Is there any other proper method to remove the glass?

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it is the bezel you need to lift/remove if dial is bigger as you said...or the movement -- or retaining ring -- rotates to get free of the case if actual dial is smaller (if retaining ring, it may lift)...I can't tell in the picture what looks bigger but it is maybe because there is (looks like there is, can't tell from my computer) a chapter ring there? If so, the chapter ring is giving the impression of a bigger dial when in reality everything should go out the back...not very clear from my end...my screen sucks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the suggestions, guys. There's no chapter ring and no movement ring. I am sure it's a front loader. The problem is how to get the crystal off. It's friction fit with white plastic gasket. The metal case is one piece. Wonder why it's designed like this.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the suggestions, guys. There's no chapter ring and no movement ring. I am sure it's a front loader. The problem is how to get the crystal off. It's friction fit with white plastic gasket. The metal case is one piece. Wonder why it's designed like this.

Because to manufacture a large watch using an economical, easily available, normal size movement, either use a chapter ring, or make a front loader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An other way is to use air.

Instead of using a crystal lift you can pump in air via the case tube.

Bergeon has a special pump for this but there are other ways.

I believe Mark uses a syringe in one of his videos.

 

Just make sure to put your thumb on the crystal so it doesn't fly away.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An other way is to use air.

Instead of using a crystal lift you can pump in air via the case tube.

Bergeon has a special pump for this but there are other ways.

I believe Mark uses a syringe in one of his videos.

 

Just make sure to put your thumb on the crystal so it doesn't fly away.

:thumbsu:  that is s good idea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0fd3661f59be587077ab140e0793e4fd.jpg

Peter, yesterday I was using this Bergeon pump but the crystal just won't come off the case. I will try again today after soaking the rim of the crystal and the gasket with some oil. I hope WD40 will do the job.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will try again today after soaking the rim of the crystal and the gasket with some oil. I hope WD40 will do the job.

WD40 (which is a water repellent, not an oil) will do absolutely nothing in terms of preventing pressure air to flow, but if you place it around the crystal it may find a way to get to the dial and stain it.

I think you should use a suction tool to remove the glass. Esssingler sells both the original Bergeon and the knock-off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24-3-2016 at 10:27 AM, steven said:

0fd3661f59be587077ab140e0793e4fd.jpg

Peter, yesterday I was using this Bergeon pump but the crystal just won't come off the case. I will try again today after soaking the rim of the crystal and the gasket with some oil. I hope WD40 will do the job.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I do not own such a bergeon pump. I use an air compressor :-) I have made pieces in nylon to fit on the case tube. You can generate morge pressure that way. But normally that bergeon pump should do the trick.

 

In the very end, if all other fail, you can break the glas, remove it, put the hand back & put a new crystal.

But that should really be a last resort ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Few days ago I came up with the idea of using the waterproof tester's pump. So i bought a meter of 6mm water filter hose and attached it to the air input tube of the water tester.

b33e756be09b66a67944cabd6b1fe586.jpg

While I hold the end of the hose to the pendant tube, my assistant pump up the pressure. We managed to hit the max pressure of 6 bar.

4f342ab14183b1d4969588a7f3af65c7.jpg

The glass at the display case back shattered.

The original glass pop out during the time when I used the glass pump. So I cement a glass to the underside of the case back. When I used the water tester pump this time, the glass burst.

Unfortunately the front crystal which I wanted to get off is still firmly attached to the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...